Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Prover op mode fixes #5014

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Prover op mode fixes #5014

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

preethamr
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Prover op mode fixes

Type of change

  • Docs change / dependency upgrade
  • Configuration / tooling changes
  • Refactoring
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Requires changes in customer code

@preethamr preethamr changed the base branch from main to staging October 16, 2023 06:06
rhlsthrm
rhlsthrm previously approved these changes Oct 16, 2023
View reviewed changes
@wanglonghong wanglonghong merged commit 951667e into staging Oct 16, 2023
22 checks passed
@wanglonghong wanglonghong deleted the prover_op_mode branch October 16, 2023 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sanchaymittal sanchaymittal sanchaymittal approved these changes

@wanglonghong wanglonghong wanglonghong approved these changes

@rhlsthrm rhlsthrm rhlsthrm left review comments

@liu-zhipeng liu-zhipeng Awaiting requested review from liu-zhipeng

@LayneHaber LayneHaber Awaiting requested review from LayneHaber

@just-a-node just-a-node Awaiting requested review from just-a-node

@carlomazzaferro carlomazzaferro Awaiting requested review from carlomazzaferro

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@preethamr @rhlsthrm @wanglonghong @sanchaymittal