add bpftrace for CI debugging

[Luap99]

I like to run a bpftrace based program in CI to collect better logs for specific processes not observed in the normal testing such as the podman container cleanup command.

Given you need to have full privs to run ebpf and the package pulls in an entire toolchain which is almost 500MB in install size we do not add it the the container images to not bloat them without reason.

containers/podman#23487

[edsantiago]

LGTM but you need to make IMG_SFX

[Luap99]

Right which greets me with

base_images/debian_base-setup.sh:52:timebomb 20240801 "prevent us from getting broken tar-1.35+dfsg-3"
cache_images/fedora_packaging.sh:220:    timebomb 20240710 "Temporary workaround for signed rpms (ima) in rawhide"

and I didn't really wanted to look at this right now. I guess I can just bump the time?

[edsantiago]

Yes, just bump it.

Note that there WILL be problems. It's been a month since my last make here, and it will probably take 3-6 iterations before this is ready. I will try my best to help.

[Luap99]

Note that there WILL be problems

Yes I know that part... but I guess someone has to suffer through that no what what. Might as well be me.

[github-actions]

Cirrus CI build successful. Found built image names and IDs:

Stage	Image Name	IMAGE_SUFFIX
base	debian	do-not-use
base	fedora	do-not-use
base	fedora-aws	do-not-use
base	fedora-aws-arm64	do-not-use
base	image-builder	do-not-use
base	prior-fedora	do-not-use
cache	build-push	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	debian	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	fedora	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	fedora-aws	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	fedora-netavark	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	fedora-netavark-aws-arm64	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	fedora-podman-aws-arm64	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	fedora-podman-py	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	prior-fedora	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	rawhide	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
cache	win-server-wsl	c20240805t173227z-f40f39d13

[edsantiago]

• 20240805t173227z-f40f39d13
• 20240708t152000z-f40f39d13 ⇑ (built in Create a local registry #357)

	debian	prior-fedora	fedora	fedora-aws	rawhide
base	13.5	39-1.5	Generic	?	41-0
	13.3 ⇑
kernel	6.9.12-1	6.9.12-100	6.9.12-200	6.9.12-200	6.8.5-301
	6.9.8-1 ⇑	6.9.7-100 ⇑	6.9.8-200 ⇑	6.9.7-200 ⇑
grub2-common	2.12-5	2.06-121	2.06-123	2.06-123	2.06-124
	2.12-2 ⇑
aardvark-dns	1.6.0-3	1.11.0-1	1.12.1-1	1.11.0-3	1.12.1-1
	1.4.0-6 ⇑		1.11.0-1 ⇑	1.11.0-1 ⇑	1.11.0-1 ⇑
netavark	1.6.0-2.1	1.11.0-1	1.12.1-1	1.11.0-3	1.11.0-3
	1.4.0-4.1 ⇑		1.11.0-1 ⇑	1.11.0-1 ⇑	1.11.0-1 ⇑
buildah	1.35.3+ds1-3	1.36.0-1	1.37.0-1	1.36.0-1	1.37.0-1
	1.33.7+ds1-1 ⇑		1.36.0-1 ⇑		1.36.0-1 ⇑
conmon	2.1.10+ds1-1+b1	2.1.12-1	2.1.12-1	2.1.10-1	2.1.12-2
					2.1.10-1 ⇑
container-selinux	?	2.232.1-1	2.232.1-1	2.232.1-1	2.232.1-2
					2.232.1-1 ⇑
containers-common	?	1-99	0.60.0-1	0.60.0-1	0.60.0-1
			0.59.1-2 ⇑	0.59.1-2 ⇑	0.59.1-1 ⇑
criu	3.17.1-3	3.19-2	3.19-6	3.19-4	3.19-7
			3.19-4 ⇑		3.19-5 ⇑
crun	1.15-1	1.15-1	1.15-1	1.15-1	1.15-2
					1.15-1 ⇑
docker-ce	5:27.1.1-1~debian.12~bookworm	?	?	?	?
	5:27.0.3-1~debian.12~bookworm ⇑
golang	2:1.22~3	1.21.12-1	1.22.5-1	1.22.5-1	1.23~rc2-1
		1.21.11-1 ⇑	1.22.4-1 ⇑	1.22.4-1 ⇑	1.23~rc1-2 ⇑
nmap-ncat	7.94+git20230807.3be01efb1+dfsg-4	7.92-2	7.92-2	7.92-2	7.92-3
		7.95-1 ⇑	7.95-1 ⇑	7.95-1 ⇑	7.95-1 ⇑
passt	2024-07-26	2024-06-24	2024-07-26	2024-06-24	2024-07-26
	2024-06-24 ⇑	2024-06-07 ⇑	2024-06-24 ⇑		2024-06-24 ⇑
podman	5.0.3+ds1-5	4.9.4-1	5.2.0-1	5.1.2-1	5.2.0~rc2-1
	4.9.5+ds1-1 ⇑		5.1.1-1 ⇑	5.1.1-1 ⇑	5.0.3-1 ⇑
runc	1.1.12+ds1-2	1.1.12-1	1.1.12-3	1.1.12-3	1.1.12-4
					1.1.12-3 ⇑
skopeo	1.13.3+ds1-2+b1	1.15.2-1	1.16.0-1	1.15.2-1	1.16.0-1
		1.15.1-1 ⇑	1.15.1-1 ⇑	1.15.1-1 ⇑	1.15.1-1 ⇑
slirp4netns	1.2.1-1+b1	1.2.2-1	1.2.2-2	1.2.2-2	1.2.2-3
					1.2.2-2 ⇑
systemd	256.4-2	254.16-1	255.10-1	255.10-1	256.4-1
	256.2-1 ⇑	254.14-1 ⇑	255.8-1 ⇑	255.8-1 ⇑	256.1-8 ⇑
tar	1.34+dfsg-1.2+deb12u1	1.35-2	1.35-3	1.35-3	1.35-4
					1.35-3 ⇑

[edsantiago]

@Luap99 care to repush, to pick up new pasta? (containers/podman#23478 (comment))

[Luap99]

Shouldn't we merge this first as the images are now used in podman?

[Luap99]

Also do we actually get the packages from the testing repos here? I would assume we need to wait for it to hit stable, no?

[edsantiago]

Eek I missed that. Okay, merged. @baude your turn, please rebase and rerun make IMG_SFX and let's see how that goes.