Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
docs: fix mdbook-linkcheck errors/warnings
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Signed-off-by: John Eckersberg <jeckersb@redhat.com>
  • Loading branch information
jeckersb committed May 14, 2024
1 parent 4f2a30c commit ee78e9e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/src/SUMMARY.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@

- [Understanding `bootc install`](bootc-install.md)
- [`man bootc-install.md`](man/bootc-install.md)
- [`man bootc-install-config`](man-md/bootc-install-config.md)
- [`man bootc-install-config`](man/bootc-install-config.md)
- [`man bootc-install-to-disk.md`](man/bootc-install-to-disk.md)
- [`man bootc-install-to-filesystem.md`](man/bootc-install-to-filesystem.md)

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/src/building/users-and-groups.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ or `DynamicUser=yes`.

### Machine-local state for users

At this point, it is important to understand the [filesystem](filesystem.md)
At this point, it is important to understand the [filesystem](../filesystem.md)
layout - the default is up to the base image.

The default Linux concept of a user has data stored in both `/etc` (`/etc/passwd`, `/etc/shadow` and groups)
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/src/relationship-particles.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ and apply that to the base operating system too.
There is a very strong security rationale behind much of the design proposal
of "particles" and DDIs. It is absolutely true today, quoting the blog:

> That said, I think [OCI has] relatively weak properties, in particular when it comes to security, since immutability/measurements and similar are not provided. This means, unlike for system extensions and portable services a complete trust chain with attestation and per-app cryptographically protected data is much harder to implement sanely.
> That said, I think \[OCI has\] relatively weak properties, in particular when it comes to security, since immutability/measurements and similar are not provided. This means, unlike for system extensions and portable services a complete trust chain with attestation and per-app cryptographically protected data is much harder to implement sanely.
The [composefs project](https://github.com/containers/composefs/) aims to close
this gap, and the bootc project will use it, and has an explicit goal
Expand Down

0 comments on commit ee78e9e

Please sign in to comment.