Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Windows regression introduced by PR #1161 #1169

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2022

Conversation

n1hility
Copy link
Member

Before 52108b7 this code used unshare.IsRootless() which on Windows always returns false (the behavior we want).

After 52108b7, a condition was unintentionally inverted, allowing Windows to function.

Commit f8f2c4f fixed the inversion, but unintentionally excluded Windows since it used == 0 instead of <= 0 (Windows returns -1)

Move the logic behind a function with a comment since the Windows path is a bit exotic.

In the future, the Windows path should likely be refactored to be more intuitive; however, this will get things working for now.

Before 52108b7 this code used unshare.IsRootless() which on Windows
always returns false (the behavior we want).

After 52108b7, a condition was unintentionally inverted, allowing
Windows to function.

Commit f8f2c4f fixed the inversion, but unintentionally excluded Windows
since it used == 0 instead of <= 0 (Windows returns -1)

Move the logic behind a function with a comment since the Windows path is a
bit exotic.

In the future, the Windows path should likely be refactored to be more
intuitive; however, this will get things working for now.

Signed-off-by: Jason T. Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, n1hility

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 29, 2022

/lgtm
/hold

I will have to cut another release once this merges.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5e92644 into containers:main Sep 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants