Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seperate karpenter config to a submodule #346

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

errm
Copy link
Member

@errm errm commented Oct 6, 2023

It seemed a bit weird that we did a lot of work to remove all of the non-core functions from the module, just to add the support for karpenter as a core part of the module.

Moving support for Karpenter to a submodule doesn't make configuring a cluster much more dificult, but does reduce the complexity of the core module, and hopefully should make ongoing maintince a little simpler. Especially if we decided to use some other node provisioning tool in the future.

It seemed a bit weird that we did a lot of work to remove all of the
non-core functions from the module, just to add the support for
karpenter as a core part of the module.

Moving support for Karpenter to a submodule doesn't make configuring
a cluster much more dificult, but does reduce the complexity of the
core module, and hopefully should make ongoing maintince a little
simpler.  Especially if we decided to use some other node provisioning
tool in the future.
@errm errm requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2023 16:10
@errm errm merged commit a7273d4 into main Oct 6, 2023
3 checks passed
@robertomiranda robertomiranda deleted the errm/seperate-karpenter branch October 9, 2023 08:18
errm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
* Seperate karpenter config to a submodule

It seemed a bit weird that we did a lot of work to remove all of the
non-core functions from the module, just to add the support for
karpenter as a core part of the module.

Moving support for Karpenter to a submodule doesn't make configuring
a cluster much more dificult, but does reduce the complexity of the
core module, and hopefully should make ongoing maintince a little
simpler.  Especially if we decided to use some other node provisioning
tool in the future.

* fmt
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant