Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update module github.com/spf13/afero to v1.11.0 #14

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 22, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
github.com/spf13/afero v1.9.5 -> v1.11.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

spf13/afero (github.com/spf13/afero)

v1.11.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: spf13/afero@v1.10.0...v1.11.0

v1.10.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: spf13/afero@v1.9.5...v1.10.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update module github.com/spf13/afero to v1.10.0 Update module github.com/spf13/afero to v1.11.0 Nov 28, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-spf13-afero-1.x branch from c8de698 to 46d4ab0 Compare November 28, 2023 21:43
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (38aff30) 100.00% compared to head (46d4ab0) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #14   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines          130       130           
=========================================
  Hits           130       130           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jun 16, 2024

ℹ Artifact update notice

File name: go.mod

In order to perform the update(s) described in the table above, Renovate ran the go get command, which resulted in the following additional change(s):

  • 1 additional dependency was updated

Details:

Package Change
golang.org/x/text v0.3.8 -> v0.14.0

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-spf13-afero-1.x branch 2 times, most recently from fc342e4 to 2501b8c Compare June 16, 2024 23:40
Copy link
Member

@kitokirisaki kitokirisaki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kitokirisaki kitokirisaki added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-spf13-afero-1.x branch from 2501b8c to c0d38a1 Compare June 16, 2024 23:43
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-spf13-afero-1.x branch from c0d38a1 to 1728290 Compare June 16, 2024 23:43
@kitokirisaki kitokirisaki merged commit 27a7f3b into main Jun 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@kitokirisaki kitokirisaki deleted the renovate/git.luolix.top-spf13-afero-1.x branch June 16, 2024 23:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants