-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cosa buildextend-extensions
blowing up
#2904
Comments
cgwalters
added a commit
to cgwalters/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904
PR in #2905 |
cgwalters
added a commit
to cgwalters/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904
cgwalters
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: #2904
dustymabe
pushed a commit
to dustymabe/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Sep 16, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805)
dustymabe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 16, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: #2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805)
dustymabe
pushed a commit
to dustymabe/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The functiona call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change.
dustymabe
pushed a commit
to dustymabe/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change.
dustymabe
pushed a commit
to dustymabe/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change.
dustymabe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: #2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change.
dustymabe
pushed a commit
to dustymabe/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Nov 10, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change. (cherry picked from commit 56aac42)
dustymabe
pushed a commit
to dustymabe/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Nov 10, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change. (cherry picked from commit 56aac42)
dustymabe
pushed a commit
to dustymabe/coreos-assembler
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: coreos#2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change. (cherry picked from commit 56aac42)
dustymabe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: #2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change. (cherry picked from commit 56aac42)
jlebon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: #2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change.
jlebon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2022
Linux `tmpfs` still doesn't support `user.` xattrs, and so for toolbox-like containers that use a (proper!) `tmpfs` for `/tmp` instead of having it be `overlayfs`, we need to ensure that we create our tempdir in `$workdir/tmp` - the workdir must have `user.` xattr support for the `cache/repo-build` anyways. Closes: #2904 (cherry picked from commit e024805) dustymabe: This cherry pick needed manual merge conflict resolution. The function call for import_ostree_commit() changed in 816ebae to pass the workdir in. I evaluated the changes in e024805 and 816ebae and determined this to be the most surgical change. (cherry picked from commit 56aac42)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Bug Report
Environment
What operating system is being used to run coreos-assembler?
Fedora 35 SB
What operating system is being assembled?
RHCOS 4.11
Is coreos-assembler running in Podman or Docker?
podman
If Podman, is coreos-assembler running privileged or unprivileged?
unprivileged
Expected Behavior
cosa buildextend-extensions
is successfulActual Behavior
Reproduction Steps
cosa init https://github.com/openshift/os
cosa fetch && cosa build
cosa buildextend-extensions
Other Information
Maybe fallout from #2892 or #2889?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: