Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: RHCOS pipeline changes #652

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from
Closed

WIP: RHCOS pipeline changes #652

wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

ravanelli
Copy link
Member

This PR contains a rebase with main and rhcos branch

@ravanelli ravanelli marked this pull request as draft September 30, 2022 16:42
@ravanelli ravanelli force-pushed the rhcos branch 12 times, most recently from 6068ec3 to 2e7b192 Compare October 3, 2022 20:20
@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Oct 3, 2022

With the first commit in #666, you should be able to just add yumrepos to the config YAML and drop b0e4350.

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Oct 5, 2022

When rebasing onto #671, you'll want to rerun jenkins.yaml using something like this:

oc process --filename=manifests/jenkins.yaml --param=NAMESPACE=... ... | oc replace -f -

And then rerun ./deploy as well and start another build of jenkins-agent.

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member

When rebasing onto #671, you'll want to rerun jenkins.yaml using something like this:

oc process --filename=manifests/jenkins.yaml --param=NAMESPACE=... ... | oc replace -f -

And then rerun ./deploy as well and start another build of jenkins-agent.

Honestly I'm thinking with all the recent changes we need to do wipe the entire namespace and start from scratch. Will give us good confidence that our "initial deployment" steps are in a good place. This probably needs to be coordinated amongst several of us. For example all of the secrets that currently exist in bitwarden need to be updated.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

For testing purposes we can make quay.io/rhel-coreos-devel or whatever right? I imagine we could also ask DPTP to run a quay instance in the CI cluster...

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Oct 7, 2022

For testing purposes we can make quay.io/rhel-coreos-devel or whatever right? I imagine we could also ask DPTP to run a quay instance in the CI cluster...

Right, we could do that. I'd prefer pushing to a namespace that already exists though so we don't have to manage yet another account somewhere and track its credentials, etc... If that doesn't exist, creating one sounds fine.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Related to this though, I have some more work in the background for coreos/coreos-assembler#2685 which as you know turns this all on its head - the canonical source of truth is a container image, so in this model a registry is required, s3 is optional.

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Feb 14, 2023

I think we can close this.

@jlebon jlebon closed this Feb 14, 2023
@ravanelli ravanelli deleted the rhcos branch February 16, 2023 18:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants