Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tracker: 'cloud'/'no cloud agents' work #95

Open
32 of 56 tasks
dustymabe opened this issue Dec 12, 2018 · 5 comments
Open
32 of 56 tasks

tracker: 'cloud'/'no cloud agents' work #95

dustymabe opened this issue Dec 12, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
cloud* related to public/private clouds priority/high

Comments

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member

dustymabe commented Dec 12, 2018

@bgilbert
Copy link
Contributor

What is the criterion for checking off a platform?

  • Having a plan?
  • Implementing the necessary pieces?
  • Producing build artifacts for that platform?
  • Having the pipeline upload images to that platform?

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

What is the criterion for checking off a platform?

added sub checkboxes

@dustymabe dustymabe changed the title tracker for 'no cloud agents' work tracker for 'cloud'/'no cloud agents' work Dec 12, 2018
@dustymabe dustymabe added the cloud* related to public/private clouds label Dec 13, 2018
@Aketzu
Copy link

Aketzu commented Jan 16, 2019

I would like to have check for Xen (and specifically paid XenServer).
There is no general cloud-init support so installation is manual. With Atomic I added custom Kickstart URL which then downloaded xe-guest-utilities and queried VM name through xen interface.

@bgilbert
Copy link
Contributor

@Aketzu Xen isn't currently in our list of target platforms, but it's worth discussing further. Could you open a new bug?

@dustymabe dustymabe changed the title tracker for 'cloud'/'no cloud agents' work tracker: 'cloud'/'no cloud agents' work Jan 17, 2019
@bgilbert bgilbert added this to Proposed in Fedora CoreOS preview via automation Jan 22, 2019
@bgilbert bgilbert moved this from Proposed to Selected in Fedora CoreOS preview Jan 22, 2019
@bgilbert bgilbert moved this from Selected to In Progress in Fedora CoreOS preview Jan 22, 2019
@bgilbert bgilbert added this to Proposed in Fedora CoreOS stable via automation Jun 24, 2019
@bgilbert bgilbert moved this from Proposed to In Progress in Fedora CoreOS stable Jun 24, 2019
@bgilbert bgilbert removed this from In Progress in Fedora CoreOS preview Jun 24, 2019
@dlabreu
Copy link

dlabreu commented Dec 31, 2019

As a user of the oVIrt Project and Red Hat Virtualization, I find of great value have the guest agent on the Virtual machines, so I can sort to information right from the Engine Dashboard such as mentioned in here (Link) https://www.ovirt.org/develop/internal/guest-agent/guest-agent.html
Some of the enterprises still run workloads on top of on-prem virtualization tools and as a hybrid approach I am certain that have the guest agents on the virtuals would add value instead of subtracting it.

If the decision is to ship without the agents I assume a good compromise would be to provide a very simple way to inject the agents on the virtual machines and also provided the project with nice documentation about. I am new to it but would be more than happy to work on the doc for the oVirt guest agent as I am a user of the technology.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cloud* related to public/private clouds priority/high
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants