packaging: drop .in extension on rpm-ostree.spec.in
#4964
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cgwalters
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
There's no processing done on this spec file nor is it hooked to the buildsystem. Drop the `.in` extension. Motivated by the fact that `dnf builddep rpm-ostree.spec.in` in dnf5 gets confused by the non `.spec` extension. And it doesn't have a `--spec` switch yet to disambiguate. Related: rpm-software-management/dnf5#810
jlebon
added a commit
to jlebon/fedora-coreos-config
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2024
This was changed in coreos/rpm-ostree#4964.
jlebon
added a commit
to coreos/fedora-coreos-config
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2024
This was changed in coreos/rpm-ostree#4964.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's no processing done on this spec file nor is it hooked to the buildsystem. Drop the
.inextension.Motivated by the fact that
dnf builddep rpm-ostree.spec.inin dnf5 gets confused by the non.specextension. And it doesn't have a--specswitch yet to disambiguate.Related: rpm-software-management/dnf5#810