Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
docs: fix typos (#18028)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
vuittont60 authored Oct 10, 2023
1 parent cf194ac commit 599b58d
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/architecture/adr-018-extendable-voting-period.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@

## Context

Currently the voting period for all governance proposals is the same. However, this is suboptimal as all governance proposals do not require the same time period. For more non-contentious proposals, they can be dealt with more efficently with a faster period, while more contentious or complex proposals may need a longer period for extended discussion/consideration.
Currently the voting period for all governance proposals is the same. However, this is suboptimal as all governance proposals do not require the same time period. For more non-contentious proposals, they can be dealt with more efficiently with a faster period, while more contentious or complex proposals may need a longer period for extended discussion/consideration.

## Decision

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/architecture/adr-020-protobuf-transaction-encoding.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ We propose that field numbers with bit 11 set (for most use cases this is
the range of 1024-2047) be considered non-critical fields that can safely be
ignored if unknown.

To handle this we will need a unknown field filter that:
To handle this we will need an unknown field filter that:

* always rejects unknown fields in unsigned content (i.e. top-level `Tx` and
unsigned parts of `AuthInfo` if present based on the signing mode)
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/architecture/adr-023-protobuf-naming.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ is used in source code to denote modules, this is often unnecessary for .proto
files as modules are the primary thing sub-packages are used for. Only items which
are known to be used infrequently should have deep sub-package depths.

For the Cosmos SDK, it is recommended that that we simply write `cosmos.bank`,
For the Cosmos SDK, it is recommended that we simply write `cosmos.bank`,
`cosmos.gov`, etc. rather than `cosmos.x.bank`. In practice, most non-module
types can go straight in the `cosmos` package or we can introduce a
`cosmos.base` package if needed. Note that this naming _will not_ change
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 599b58d

Please sign in to comment.