-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Report errors in Close() defer functions #11785
Labels
C:errors
good first issue
T: Dev UX
UX for SDK developers (i.e. how to call our code)
Type: QA
Quality Assurance
Comments
robert-zaremba
added
T: Dev UX
UX for SDK developers (i.e. how to call our code)
Type: QA
Quality Assurance
C:errors
labels
Apr 26, 2022
ACK. Would be in favor of calling it |
Hi, I am new to this repo and would like to take this task, can I? I just have a question, should it be part of this task to add the new helper in the necessary places? |
@leoflalv sure. I propose you to firstly create a small PR by updating only one module. Maybe |
19 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2022
## Description Closes: #11785 A new helper function called `LogDeferred` was added. This function it's used to report errors in `defer` section. It was added in `defer` statements of `x/bank` folder. ### Author Checklist I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules) - [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [x] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
This was referenced Nov 29, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C:errors
good first issue
T: Dev UX
UX for SDK developers (i.e. how to call our code)
Type: QA
Quality Assurance
Description
Very often we ignore errors, or omit them in a defer functions, eg:
Proposal
Create a wrapper function:
For Admin Use
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: