Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: add protection against accidental downgrades #10407

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Jan 25, 2022

Conversation

aleem1314
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Closes: #10318


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

x/upgrade/abci.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/upgrade/abci.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/upgrade/abci.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@aleem1314 aleem1314 marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2021 06:10
@aleem1314 aleem1314 marked this pull request as draft November 11, 2021 06:22
@aleem1314 aleem1314 marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2021 06:44
x/upgrade/abci.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When reading the code it's hard to understand the goal of multiple verifyAppliedHandlerPresent calls in the BeginBlocker. I think we can do that check only once at the very beginning. See comments.

x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/upgrade/abci.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/upgrade/abci.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Race test failure looks certainly unrelated. Now that DowngradeVerified is made private, can we merge?

Copy link
Collaborator

@anilcse anilcse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -12,6 +12,16 @@ import (
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/upgrade/types"
)

// downgradeVerified is a variable that tells if we've already sanity checked that this binary version isn't being used against an old state.
// If so, we dont run that check every beginblock.
var downgradeVerified = false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we have this be part of the keeper instead? Or is that not possible? I just really try to advise against the use of globals when possible.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't keepers supposed to be stateless though?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Kinda sorta, yes. Staking isn't (hooks). This is just a suggestion though.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Putting this variable in keeper is better than using global.
Why keepers should be stateless?

@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

ValarDragon commented Jan 10, 2022

Any chance we can get this merged this week? (and have follow-up in issues if needed? Nothing looks blocking, but moreso code hygiene that can probably be done in a small follow-up)

It would be really nice to get this into software versions ASAP, to protect more node operator time. Would like this to not get stuck in open PR purgatory.

Also, can we get this PR backported to v0.44.x and v0.45.x?

Copy link
Collaborator

@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's move the downgradeVerified to keeper structure

@@ -12,6 +12,16 @@ import (
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/upgrade/types"
)

// downgradeVerified is a variable that tells if we've already sanity checked that this binary version isn't being used against an old state.
// If so, we dont run that check every beginblock.
var downgradeVerified = false
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Putting this variable in keeper is better than using global.
Why keepers should be stateless?

@@ -410,3 +410,70 @@ func TestDumpUpgradeInfoToFile(t *testing.T) {
err = os.Remove(upgradeInfoFilePath)
require.Nil(err)
}

// TODO: add testcase to for `no upgrade handler is present for last applied upgrade`.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about this TODO?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is hard to add tests for a few cases without exposing/adding few functions. And we cannot move those tests to internal package (getting import cycles).

x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@robert-zaremba
Copy link
Collaborator

we could backport it to v0.45 if we get it merged today.
cc: @AmauryM

@robert-zaremba
Copy link
Collaborator

For the record: this changeset is NOT consensus breaking because

  1. We don't modify the state
  2. Happens only once at the first begin blocker call to the upgrade module
  3. It only impacts the local node (it will stop it if it detects a downgrade)

@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Can this be merged?

@aleem1314 aleem1314 added the A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. label Jan 25, 2022
@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Is this test failure related to the PR? Seems to not be present on master

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 5622115 into master Jan 25, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the aleem/10318-binary-downgrades branch January 25, 2022 16:23
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2022
## Description

Closes: #10318

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 5622115)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go
robert-zaremba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2022
…#11026)

* feat!: add protection against accidental downgrades (#10407)

## Description

Closes: #10318

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 5622115)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go

* chore: resolve conflicts

Co-authored-by: MD Aleem <72057206+aleem1314@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: aleem1314 <aleem@vitwit.com>
@faddat faddat mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2022
8 tasks
JimLarson pushed a commit to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…10407) (cosmos#11026)

* feat!: add protection against accidental downgrades (cosmos#10407)

## Description

Closes: cosmos#10318

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 5622115)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go

* chore: resolve conflicts

Co-authored-by: MD Aleem <72057206+aleem1314@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: aleem1314 <aleem@vitwit.com>
Eengineer1 pushed a commit to cheqd/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
…10407) (cosmos#11026)

* feat!: add protection against accidental downgrades (cosmos#10407)

Closes: cosmos#10318

---

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 5622115)

* chore: resolve conflicts

Co-authored-by: MD Aleem <72057206+aleem1314@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: aleem1314 <aleem@vitwit.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. C:x/upgrade
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make binaries have protection against accidental downgrades
6 participants