-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Revert middlewares to antehandler (part 2/2: posthandler) #11985
Conversation
579f800
to
801a7d6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but I don't see anywhere where we use ctx.Priority
for CheckTx?
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
…sdk into am/revert-045-part2
Oh yeah good catch, see 35866ff. |
hey, if it is possible to "lgtm" that would be super because this PR is now blocking the refactors we need to do for craft. Thanks guys. |
// needs a coordinated upgrade. | ||
// | ||
// Uncomment to enable postHandlers: | ||
// app.setPostHandler() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any opinions if we should enable Tips by default on simapp (note: all chains that will copy-paste simapp might also enable them)? Is it a use case that's generic enough to be enabled by default on all cosmos chains?
I'd personally say no, and it's more a specific use-case, but would like to hear other opinions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would go with a yes, when we built craft, one of the discoveries that I think that we had is that an application template with all of the features turned on would be useful. Also, if we have this turned on in simapp, it gets tested
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But if it’s there and come and to down at least it can be used. Just so that you know, craft began as an implementation of simapp.
basically I’d like to see a Nonsimapp app template in the sdk
I’ve been calling that tiny.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For various reasons Gaia is no longer a great template. Unfortunately the same can be said of starport.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Like yourself I think it’s not too much of a big deal in either direction if this is present directly in the simulation app or not but I would lean toward including it
Going to put automerge on, to unblock downstream work. Two decisions still need to be made:
I can create a follow-up PR if any decision changes on the two items above. |
thanks @AmauryM :) |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11985 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 66.02% 66.00% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 672 671 -1
Lines 71232 70959 -273
==========================================
- Hits 47032 46834 -198
+ Misses 21523 21470 -53
+ Partials 2677 2655 -22
|
## Description ref: #11985 (comment) --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
…osmos#11985) ## Description We decided to remove middlewares, and revert to antehandlers (exactly like in v045) for this release. A better middleware solution will be implemented after v046. ref: cosmos#11955 This PR is part 2 of 2: - part 1: Revert baseapp and middlewares to v0.45.4 - part 2: Add posthandler, tips, priority Depends on: - [x] cosmos#11979 --- Suggestion for reviewers: - Apart from correctness, I would also like someone to review **exhaustiveness**. I.e. all changes we made in v046 into the [middleware folder](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/tree/v0.46.0-beta2/x/auth/middleware) are reflected in this PR, and that I didn't forget anything. I found the following ones: - add a TxFeeChecker in DeductFee - add a ExtensionChecker in ExtCheckerDecorator - add a TipDecorator --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Description
We decided to remove middlewares, and revert to antehandlers (exactly like in v045) for this release. A better middleware solution will be implemented after v046.
ref: #11955
This PR is part 2 of 2:
Depends on:
Suggestion for reviewers:
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change