Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump tm in 0.45.x #12784

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 4, 2022
Merged

chore: bump tm in 0.45.x #12784

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 4, 2022

Conversation

tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

Bump tendermint to 0.34.20 for 0.45 line

@tac0turtle tac0turtle marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2022 13:28
@tac0turtle tac0turtle requested a review from amaury1093 August 1, 2022 13:38
Copy link
Contributor

@amaury1093 amaury1093 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Is this worth a changelog for 0.45 users?

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member Author

Is this worth a changelog for 0.45 users?

I can add

@@ -24,29 +24,29 @@ require (
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.4
github.com/hdevalence/ed25519consensus v0.0.0-20210204194344-59a8610d2b87
github.com/improbable-eng/grpc-web v0.14.1
github.com/jhump/protoreflect v1.9.0
github.com/magiconair/properties v1.8.5
github.com/jhump/protoreflect v1.12.1-0.20220417024638-438db461d753
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm this needs to be downgraded but it affects tendermint

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you elaborate on "affects Tendermint"?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

when I downgrade to 1.12.0 tendermint downgrades and vice versa. On main we have this version and the tests pass. Not sure what's up

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might have to force the protoreflect version via a replace directive in order to use TM v0.34.20

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is super weird. I cant get it work even with the old versions

@tac0turtle tac0turtle merged commit e23386b into release/v0.45.x Aug 4, 2022
@tac0turtle tac0turtle deleted the bumpy-bumpy branch August 4, 2022 07:51
randy75828 pushed a commit to Switcheo/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
* bump tendermint version

* add changelog entry

* replace on jhump

* updates

* updates

* updates

Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <aleks.bezobchuk@gmail.com>
johnletey added a commit to kyve-org/cosmos-sdk-old that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2022
* Update tag.yml

* fix: update index of crisis invariant check logs (backport cosmos#12208) (cosmos#12210)

* fix: update index of crisis invariant check logs (cosmos#12208)

## Description

the info log messages describing invariant checks use the index to state
progress (eg. `asserting crisis invariants inv=0/15`). this simple change
makes them 1-indexed (eg. `asserting crisis invariants inv=1/15`).

example before:

<img width="374" alt="Screen Shot 2022-06-09 at 12 06 58 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14897503/172925006-8810706c-0948-4e36-85b8-22813ccc9311.png">

Closes: #XXXX

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - N/A
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - N/A
- [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules) - N/A
- [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - N/A
- [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - N/A
- [x] updated the relevant documentation or specification - N/A
- [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - N/A
- [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 907df32)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: Robert Pirtle <Astropirtle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr>

* fix: Refactor GetLastCompletedUpgrade [v0.45.x] (cosmos#12264)

* fix: defaultGenTxGas to 10 times (cosmos#12314)

* fix: edit validator bug from cli (cosmos#12317)

* chore: update release notes (cosmos#12377)

* feat: add query.GenericFilteredPaginated (backport cosmos#12253) (cosmos#12371)

* fix: update x/mint parameter validation (backport cosmos#12384) (cosmos#12396)

* chore: optimize get last completed upgrade (cosmos#12268)

* feat: improve GetLastCompletedUpgrade

* rename

* use var block

* fix: Simulation is not deterministic due to GenTx (backport cosmos#12374) (cosmos#12437)

* fix: use go install instead of go get in makefile (cosmos#12435)

* chore: fumpt sdk v45 series cosmos#12442

* feat: Move AppModule.BeginBlock and AppModule.EndBlock to extension interfaces (backport cosmos#12603) (cosmos#12638)

* feat: Move AppModule.BeginBlock and AppModule.EndBlock to extension interfaces (cosmos#12603)

## Description
Most modules right now have a no-op for AppModule.BeginBlock and AppModule.EndBlock. We should move these methods off the AppModule interface so we have less deadcode, and instead move them to extension interfaces.

1. I added `BeginBlockAppModule` and `EndBlockAppModule` interface.
2. Remove the dead-code from modules that do no implement them
3. Add type casting in the the module code to use the new interface

Closes: cosmos#12462

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit b65f3fe)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	x/authz/module/module.go
#	x/group/module/module.go
#	x/nft/module/module.go
#	x/params/module.go
#	x/slashing/module.go
#	x/upgrade/module.go

* remove conflicts

* remove conflicts

* remove unused modules

Co-authored-by: Sishir Giri <sishirg27@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>

* feat: add message index event attribute to authz message execution (backport cosmos#12668) (cosmos#12673)

* chore(store): upgrade iavl to v0.19.0 (backport cosmos#12626) (cosmos#12697)

* feat: Add `GetParamSetIfExists` to prevent panic on breaking param changes (cosmos#12724)

* feat: Add convenience method for constructing key to access account's balance for a given denom (backport cosmos#12674) (cosmos#12745)

* feat: Add convenience method for constructing key to access account's balance for a given denom (cosmos#12674)

This PR adds a convenience method for constructing the key necessary to query for the account's balance of a given denom.

I ran into this issue since we are using ABCI query now to perform balance requests because we are also requesting merkle proofs for the returned balance [here](https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-node/pull/911/files#diff-0ee31f5a7bd88e9f758e6bebdf3ee36365519e55a451098d9638c39afe5eac42R144).

It would be nice to have a definitive convenience method for constructing the key.

[Ref.](github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-node/pull/911)

(cherry picked from commit a1777a8)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/store.go
#	x/bank/types/keys.go

* Update CHANGELOG.md

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: rene <41963722+renaynay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marko <marbar3778@yahoo.com>

* chore: bump tm in 0.45.x (cosmos#12784)

* bump tendermint version

* add changelog entry

* replace on jhump

* updates

* updates

* updates

Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <aleks.bezobchuk@gmail.com>

* chore: 0.45.7 changelog prep (cosmos#12821)

* prepare for release

* modify release notes

* chore: migrate from registry to delegation keeper

Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Pirtle <Astropirtle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr>
Co-authored-by: HaeSung <hea9549.github@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: likhita-809 <78951027+likhita-809@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Zaremba <robert@zaremba.ch>
Co-authored-by: Adu <foriteration@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jacob Gadikian <jacobgadikian@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sishir Giri <sishirg27@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <31522760+fedekunze@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rene <41963722+renaynay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <aleks.bezobchuk@gmail.com>
JeancarloBarrios pushed a commit to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
* bump tendermint version

* add changelog entry

* replace on jhump

* updates

* updates

* updates

Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <aleks.bezobchuk@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants