Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: math lib update and type fixes #12791

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 2, 2022

Conversation

faddat
Copy link
Contributor

@faddat faddat commented Aug 1, 2022

Description

Upgrades the math library in the repo root and find/replaces many usages of sdk.Dec, sdk.ZeroDec, sdk.OneDec, sdk.NewDec with their legacy-ified-math-lib replacements.

Note for review: I assume that I did not find 100% of usages


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@faddat faddat requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2022 18:29
@faddat faddat changed the title Notionally math chore: math lib update and type fixes Aug 1, 2022
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@amaury1093 amaury1093 added the A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. label Aug 2, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #12791 (750f91b) into main (2932e11) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 54.76%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #12791      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.12%   56.16%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         641      645       +4     
  Lines       54563    54660      +97     
==========================================
+ Hits        30625    30699      +74     
- Misses      21471    21485      +14     
- Partials     2467     2476       +9     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
client/tx/factory.go 25.60% <0.00%> (ø)
types/simulation/rand_util.go 37.23% <0.00%> (ø)
x/auth/migrations/legacytx/stdtx.go 81.41% <0.00%> (ø)
x/distribution/keeper/validator.go 92.20% <0.00%> (ø)
x/gov/types/v1/params.go 48.14% <0.00%> (ø)
x/gov/types/v1/params_legacy.go 18.18% <0.00%> (ø)
x/gov/types/v1/tally.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/gov/types/v1beta1/genesis.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/gov/types/v1beta1/tally.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/mint/keeper/keeper.go 62.50% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 31 more

@mergify mergify bot merged commit cb31043 into cosmos:main Aug 2, 2022
larry0x pushed a commit to larry0x/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
## Description

Upgrades the math library in the repo root and find/replaces many usages of sdk.Dec, sdk.ZeroDec, sdk.OneDec, sdk.NewDec with their legacy-ified-math-lib replacements.

Note for review: I assume that I did not find 100% of usages

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants