refactor: migrate to cosmos/gogoproto

[julienrbrt]

Description

Closes: #10925

After this is merged, I'll tag cosmossdk.io/api and update all dependencies.
This will remove the indirect dependency of gogo/protobuf.

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[tac0turtle]

we should review the changes here https://github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/commits/master before merging this into mainline.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #13070 (cb9a8a3) into main (d9972c4) will increase coverage by 0.40%.
The diff coverage is 16.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13070      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.64%   54.05%   +0.40%     
==========================================
  Files         647      655       +8     
  Lines       55199    56223    +1024     
==========================================
+ Hits        29612    30390     +778     
- Misses      23215    23401     +186     
- Partials     2372     2432      +60     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
baseapp/abci.go	67.01% <ø> (ø)
baseapp/baseapp.go	77.93% <ø> (ø)
baseapp/grpcrouter.go	90.00% <ø> (ø)
baseapp/grpcrouter_helpers.go	25.00% <ø> (ø)
baseapp/grpcserver.go	1.72% <ø> (ø)
baseapp/msg_service_router.go	85.29% <ø> (ø)
client/context.go	54.49% <ø> (ø)
client/grpc_query.go	15.38% <ø> (ø)
client/tx/aux_builder.go	84.17% <ø> (ø)
client/tx/tx.go	33.57% <ø> (ø)
... and 56 more

[amaury1093]

Code lgtm, however when I run the makefile commands using 0.9.0, it regenerates to gogo/protobuf. I guess that's why you put 0.10 in the makefile, and waiting for this PR to get merged before tagging 0.10?

If so, I can approve now

[julienrbrt]

Code lgtm, however when I run the makefile commands using 0.9.0, it regenerates to gogo/protobuf. I guess that's why you put 0.10 in the makefile, and waiting for this PR to get merged before tagging 0.10?

If so, I can approve now

Right, I have been generating them with:

# How to run manually:
docker build --pull --rm -f "contrib/devtools/Dockerfile" -t cosmossdk-proto:latest "contrib/devtools"
docker run --rm -v $(pwd):/workspace --workdir /workspace cosmossdk-proto sh ./scripts/protocgen.sh

Once this is merged, 0.10 will be tagged with the Dockerfile changes.

[tac0turtle]

quick glance im not sure we need to replace all instances of goo/proto with cosmos/gogoproto, right?

[amaury1093]

utACK, but I can test once the docker image is tagged