-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(auth): use collections for Account state management #16016
Conversation
…query server interface
# Conflicts: # x/auth/keeper/grpc_query.go
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ | |||
if err := cdc.UnmarshalInterface(iterator.Value(), &acc); err != nil { | |||
return err | |||
} | |||
store.Set(types.AccountNumberStoreKey(acc.GetAccountNumber()), acc.GetAddress().Bytes()) | |||
store.Set(accountNumberStoreKey(acc.GetAccountNumber()), acc.GetAddress().Bytes()) |
Check warning
Code scanning / gosec
Errors unhandled.
seems like ci is still broken? |
# Conflicts: # x/auth/keeper/grpc_query.go # x/auth/keeper/keeper.go
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ func TestSetPubKey(t *testing.T) { | |||
// set accounts and create msg for each address | |||
for i, addr := range addrs { | |||
acc := suite.accountKeeper.NewAccountWithAddress(suite.ctx, addr) | |||
require.NoError(t, acc.SetAccountNumber(uint64(i))) | |||
require.NoError(t, acc.SetAccountNumber(uint64(i+1000))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we open an issue to redo these tests to avoid this overwriting?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBH, considering we're creating a new auth & accounts module I think we can leave things as is in x/auth assuming no more huge extra features will be put here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change