docs: fixes broken links #19295
docs: fixes broken links #19295
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@samricotta has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe Cosmos SDK has undergone a series of updates aimed at refining its codebase and documentation. These changes encompass updates to URLs, the removal of deprecated functions, modifications in error messaging, and a shift towards CometBFT. Additionally, adjustments have been made to IBC modules, dependencies, and coin handling. Documentation has been streamlined by correcting links, updating file paths, and removing outdated references. These enhancements are designed to improve the SDK's usability, security, and overall functionality. Changes
This table groups similar changes across different files to provide a concise overview of the updates made to the Cosmos SDK codebase and documentation. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 482d0d191b8ae10231ad44f5a0293413daffbce9 and 5ff3728332f4e80f29f2b3519d282969d05673a7.Files selected for processing (39)
- .coderabbit.yml (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (9 hunks)
- UPGRADING.md (3 hunks)
- api/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.pulsar.go (30 hunks)
- client/cmd.go (1 hunks)
- client/v2/internal/offchain/msgSignArbitraryData.proto (2 hunks)
- collections/lookup_map_test.go (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-070-unordered-transactions.md (6 hunks)
- proto/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.proto (2 hunks)
- scripts/init-simapp.sh (2 hunks)
- server/util.go (1 hunks)
- server/util_test.go (9 hunks)
- simapp/simd/cmd/root_v2.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/goleveldb.go (4 hunks)
- store/db/memdb.go (3 hunks)
- store/db/prefixdb.go (1 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (2 hunks)
- tests/go.sum (22 hunks)
- types/codec_test.go (1 hunks)
- types/coin.go (1 hunks)
- types/coin_test.go (1 hunks)
- types/collections.go (3 hunks)
- types/utils.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.sum (2 hunks)
- x/gov/CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
- x/gov/README.md (7 hunks)
- x/gov/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/gov/go.sum (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/tally.go (5 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/tally_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/migrations/v6/store.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/migrations/v6/store_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/simulation/genesis.go (4 hunks)
- x/gov/simulation/genesis_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/types/v1/gov.pb.go (11 hunks)
- x/gov/types/v1/params.go (6 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (3)
- api/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- tests/go.sum: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- x/gov/types/v1/gov.pb.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- client/v2/internal/offchain/msgSignArbitraryData.proto
- collections/lookup_map_test.go
- scripts/init-simapp.sh
- store/db/db_test.go
- x/accounts/go.sum
- x/gov/go.sum
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- CHANGELOG.md
- UPGRADING.md
Additional comments: 108
types/codec_test.go (1)
- 14-17: The test function
TestUintValuecorrectly tests the encoding and decoding of unsigned integer values using theUintValuecodec. It covers different scenarios including a regular number, zero value, and a large number represented as a string. This ensures a good range of test cases for the functionality..coderabbit.yml (1)
- 1-32: The configuration in
.coderabbit.ymlis syntactically correct and logically structured. It specifies language settings, review features, path filters, and instructions for different types of files. This setup should effectively guide the review process according to the specified instructions for Golang code, tests, and documentation.x/gov/migrations/v6/store.go (1)
- 43-43: The assignment of
YesQuorumand other fields fromdefaultParamstogovParamsensures that the migration process updates the governance parameters to include new fields introduced in this version. This is a necessary step for maintaining compatibility and ensuring that the governance module functions correctly after the migration.x/gov/migrations/v6/store_test.go (1)
- 21-49: The test function
TestMigrateStoreproperly checks the migration logic by setting initial parameters, running the migration, and then asserting that the parameters have been updated correctly. This includes checking for the addition of new parameters likeYesQuorumandProposalCancelMaxPeriod. The use ofrequire.NoErrorandrequire.Equalfrom thetestifypackage ensures that the test will fail appropriately if the migration does not perform as expected.types/utils.go (1)
- 2-7: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The removal of
SortJSONandMustSortJSONfunctions along with theencoding/jsonimport indicates a shift towards relying on amino signing for byte sorting. This simplification reduces complexity and potential sources of error in byte sorting operations.x/gov/simulation/genesis_test.go (1)
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [50-64]
The update to constants and the addition of a new assertion for
tallyYesQuorumin theTestRandomizedGenStatefunction reflect changes in governance parameters. This ensures that the simulation tests are aligned with the updated governance module's behavior, which is crucial for accurately testing the module's functionality.x/gov/CHANGELOG.md (1)
- 39-40: The addition of entries for
ProposalCancelMaxPeriodandYesQuorumparameters in the changelog provides clear documentation of the changes made to the governance module. This is important for users and developers to understand the modifications and their impact on the module's functionality.simapp/simd/cmd/root_v2.go (1)
- 66-66: The addition of
.WithViper("")to theclientCtxassignment chain modifies how Viper is used for configuration management. While this change seems to be intended to initialize Viper with default settings, it's important to ensure that this does not inadvertently affect the configuration loading process, especially since an empty string is passed as an argument. This should be tested to verify that it behaves as expected in all scenarios whereclientCtxis used.store/db/prefixdb.go (1)
- 197-197: The modification in the
Domainmethod ofprefixDBIteratorto return two[]byteslices without named return values is a minor change that simplifies the method signature. This change is syntactically correct and does not affect the logic of the method. However, it's important to ensure consistency in method signatures across the codebase.x/accounts/go.mod (1)
- 163-170: The addition of a new dependency mapping for
cosmossdk.io/x/txto../txin thego.modfile correctly specifies a local path for thetxmodule. This is a common practice for managing dependencies that are part of the same project or workspace. It's important to ensure that the relative path../txaccurately reflects the location of thetxmodule within the project structure.x/gov/go.mod (1)
- 171-176: The
replacedirective forcosmossdk.io/x/txis correctly pointing to../tx, which aligns with the PR's objective to fix broken links. This change ensures that the local version of thex/txmodule is used instead of fetching it from a remote repository, which is a common practice in Go modules for local development or when working with forked versions of dependencies.x/gov/simulation/genesis.go (2)
- 27-27: The addition of the
YesQuorumconstant is consistent with the Cosmos SDK's approach to managing governance parameters. This constant likely serves as a key for simulation parameters related to governance proposals that require a certain percentage of "Yes" votes to pass, excluding abstentions. It's important to ensure that this new parameter is well-documented and tested to clarify its impact on governance simulations.- 90-93: The
GenYesQuorumfunction introduces randomized generation of theYesQuorumparameter for simulation purposes. This is a logical extension of the simulation framework, allowing for more diverse testing scenarios. However, it's crucial to ensure that the range of generated values (0 to 500) is appropriate and reflects realistic governance scenarios. Additionally, the precision of 3 decimal places should be justified in the context of howYesQuorumis used within the governance module.store/db/goleveldb.go (4)
- 28-28: The
NewGoLevelDBfunction correctly adds a new replace directive for handling options, which is a good practice for providing customizable behavior of the GoLevelDB instance. However, ensure that the documentation clearly explains the purpose of theoptsparameter and how it can be used to customize the database instance, especially themaxopenfilesoption.- 42-42: The
NewGoLevelDBWithOptsfunction's modification to accept two string parameters (name,dir) remains consistent with the expected functionality of creating a new GoLevelDB instance with specific options. This change is straightforward and aligns with the need for specifying the database name and directory path explicitly.- 79-79: The modification in the
Setmethod to accept two byte slice parameters (key,value) instead of individual byte slice parameters is a standard approach for key-value storage functions. This change is logical and aligns with the method's purpose. Ensure that the error handling for empty keys and nil values is adequately tested to prevent data integrity issues.- 93-93: Similarly, the
SetSyncmethod's adjustment to accept two byte slice parameters for synchronous setting operations is appropriate and follows the same rationale as theSetmethod. This consistency in method signatures across asynchronous and synchronous operations is good for API usability. Again, testing around error conditions is crucial.types/collections.go (3)
- 36-37: The introduction of the
UintValueconstant and its association with theuintValueCodectype is a logical extension to supportmath.Uinttypes in the Cosmos SDK's collections package. This addition enhances the SDK's type support and aligns with the existing pattern of providing codecs for different data types. Ensure that this new codec is thoroughly tested, especially for edge cases around largeUintvalues.- 58-61: The addition of the
IntandUintconstants provides a clear and concise way to refer to the value types supported by the SDK's collections codecs. This is a good practice for code readability and maintainability. Ensure that these constants are used consistently across the SDK wherever applicable.- 212-245: The implementation of the
uintValueCodectype for encoding and decodingmath.Uintvalues is crucial for supporting unsigned integers in the SDK's collections. This implementation appears to follow the established pattern used by other codecs, such asintValueCodec. It's important to ensure that the methods ofuintValueCodechandle all possible edge cases correctly, especially regarding JSON encoding/decoding and value stringification. Additionally, confirming thatmath.Uintvalues are marshaled and unmarshaled correctly will be essential for data integrity.docs/architecture/adr-070-unordered-transactions.md (3)
- 6-6: The addition of a new section on deterministic transaction encoding is a significant update to this ADR. It's crucial to ensure that this section provides clear guidance on how to achieve deterministic transaction hashes to prevent duplicate unordered transactions. This addition should also reference relevant ADRs or documentation that detail the encoding process.
- 280-288: Emphasizing the importance of deterministic transaction hashes is crucial for the security and integrity of unordered transactions. This section correctly highlights the potential issues with non-deterministic transaction encoding and references ADR-027 for a solution. It's important to ensure that developers are aware of the implications of transaction encoding on the prevention of duplicate unordered transactions and are guided to follow best practices in transaction signing and encoding.
- 315-316: The mention of additional storage overhead and management of processed unordered transactions existing outside of consensus state is an important consideration. This highlights a potential drawback of managing unordered transactions, which developers and node operators should be aware of. It's crucial to provide guidance on how to efficiently manage this overhead to minimize its impact on node performance and storage requirements.
store/db/memdb.go (4)
- 91-91: The modification of the
Setmethod signature to accept separatekeyandvalueparameters enhances clarity and type safety, ensuring that the function's purpose and expected inputs are explicit.- 111-111: The
SetSyncmethod's signature change mirrors that of theSetmethod, maintaining consistency across the API. This change further reinforces the explicitness of input parameters.- 234-234: The update to
newMemDBIteratorto reflect changes in parameter signatures aligns with the modifications made to theSetandSetSyncmethods, ensuring consistency in how keys and values are handled across the database interface.- 238-238: Similarly, the
newMemDBIteratorMtxChoicefunction's signature update is consistent with the rest of the changes, ensuring that the iterator creation functions remain aligned with the updated method signatures for setting values in the database.tests/go.mod (2)
- 229-229: Moving
cosmossdk.io/depinjectto thereplaceblock indicates a temporary local override, likely for development or testing purposes. This is a common practice to test local changes or unreleased versions of modules.- 246-246: Similarly, moving
cosmossdk.io/x/txto thereplaceblock serves the same purpose as the previous comment, ensuring that local or specific versions of these modules are used during testing. This approach is useful for testing changes in tightly coupled modules.x/gov/types/v1/params.go (4)
- 25-25: Introducing the
DefaultYesQuorumconstant provides a clear default value for the newyesQuorumparameter, enhancing the configurability and flexibility of governance parameters.- 44-44: Adding
yesQuorumto theNewParamsfunction signature allows for the initialization of governance parameters with a specificyesQuorumvalue, aligning with the introduction of theDefaultYesQuorumconstant and expanding the parameters' configurability.- 80-80: Similarly, including
yesQuorumin theDefaultParamsfunction ensures that the default governance parameters are initialized with theDefaultYesQuorumvalue, maintaining consistency and clarity in the default parameter setup.- 129-138: The addition of
yesQuorumvalidation in theValidateBasicmethod ensures that the new parameter adheres to expected constraints, such as being non-negative and not exceeding 1. This validation is crucial for maintaining the integrity of governance parameters.x/gov/keeper/tally.go (3)
- 69-76: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [72-85]
The update to use
YesQuorumin thetallyStandardfunction, including fetching it from custom message parameters when available, ensures that the new governance parameter is correctly applied in the tallying process. This change is crucial for accurately determining the outcome of proposals based on the newly introducedyesQuorumlogic.
- 101-105: The early return condition based on the
yesQuorumcheck in thetallyStandardfunction ensures that proposals fail if they do not meet the specifiedyesQuorumthreshold. This addition is a significant change that aligns with the introduction of theyesQuorumparameter, ensuring that governance decisions reflect this new criterion.- 145-149: The inclusion of
yesQuorumlogic in thetallyExpeditedfunction mirrors the changes made in thetallyStandardfunction, ensuring consistency across different types of proposal tallying. This consistency is important for maintaining predictable and understandable governance behavior.client/cmd.go (1)
- 364-370: The implementation of checking for a nil command context and setting it to a background context if so, before setting the provided client context, is logically sound and correctly follows Go's context handling best practices.
proto/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.proto (2)
- 353-358: The addition of the
yes_quorumfield to theParamsmessage with a default value of 0 (disabled) is clear and well-documented. The comment provides sufficient explanation for its purpose and default behavior.- 370-375: Similarly, the addition of the
yes_quorumfield to theMessageBasedParamsmessage is well-documented, including the condition for disabling it. This maintains consistency across message types and ensures clarity for developers.server/util_test.go (9)
- 67-67: Adding
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)before test assertions is a good practice to ensure that the server context is correctly initialized and available for the tests. This enhances the reliability of the tests by ensuring they operate on a valid context.- 147-147: Similarly, initializing the server context before assertions in this test case is appropriate and ensures that the test environment is correctly set up. This is crucial for tests that rely on specific configurations being loaded.
- 187-187: Ensuring the server context is initialized before proceeding with test assertions in this case is correct and necessary for the accuracy of the test. It guarantees that the test operates with the expected configuration settings.
- 217-217: The practice of initializing the server context before test assertions is consistently applied here as well, which is good for maintaining the integrity and reliability of the test environment.
- 255-255: Initializing the server context before test assertions in this scenario is also appropriate. It ensures that the environment variables are correctly taken into account in the server configuration for the test.
- 364-364: The consistent use of initializing the server context before test assertions across different test cases, as seen here, is a good practice. It ensures that the tests are reliable and the configurations are correctly loaded.
- 382-382: Again, initializing the server context before test assertions ensures that the environment variables are correctly reflected in the server configuration, which is crucial for the accuracy of this test.
- 400-400: The initialization of the server context before test assertions in this case ensures that the configuration file settings are correctly loaded into the server configuration for the test, which is necessary for test accuracy.
- 418-418: Ensuring the server context is initialized before test assertions, even when no specific configuration source is set, is good for testing the default configuration settings. This approach maintains the consistency and reliability of the test setup.
server/util.go (1)
- 218-226: The modification to
SetCmdServerContextto check if the command's context isniland set it to a background context if so, is a good practice for ensuring that there is always a context available for operations that require one. This change enhances the robustness of the command execution by ensuring that the server context is always set, preventing potentialnilpointer dereferences.types/coin.go (1)
- 71-79: The addition of the
IsGTmethod to theCointype is a logical extension of the existing comparison methods (IsGTE,IsLT, etc.). This method provides a clear and concise way to compare two coins of the same denomination to determine if one has a greater amount than the other. The use of a panic for mismatched denominations is consistent with the existing methods, ensuring that comparisons are only made between coins of the same type. This approach enforces strict type safety at runtime.types/coin_test.go (1)
- 305-327: The test function
TestIsGTCoincorrectly tests various scenarios for theIsGTmethod, including cases where a panic is expected due to differing denominations. This is a comprehensive approach to testing, ensuring that the method behaves as expected across different inputs.x/gov/keeper/msg_server_test.go (4)
- 1902-1915: The test case "invalid yes quorum" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamscorrectly checks for a negativeYesQuorumvalue, ensuring that the parameter validation logic is robust against invalid inputs. This addition enhances the test coverage for message parameter updates related to voting, specifically targeting scenarios whereYesQuorumis negative.- 1921-1927: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1924-1939]
The test case "invalid threshold" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamseffectively tests for a negativeThresholdvalue. This is crucial for ensuring that the parameter validation logic correctly handles cases where the threshold for voting is set to an invalid value, further improving the test coverage for parameter validation.
- 1951-1957: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1954-1969]
The test case "invalid veto threshold" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamsproperly tests for a negativeVetoThresholdvalue. This addition is important for verifying that the parameter validation logic accurately rejects invalid veto threshold values, thereby enhancing the test coverage for parameter validation in voting scenarios.
- 1969-1969: The test case "valid" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamswith aYesQuorumvalue of "0" is a good inclusion for testing the boundary condition of a zeroYesQuorum. This ensures that the system can handle scenarios where the quorum for a "yes" vote is set to the minimum possible value, contributing to comprehensive test coverage.x/gov/README.md (1)
- 233-239: The addition of the "Yes Quorum" subsection under "Concepts" introduces a new concept that is crucial for understanding the governance process. This section clearly defines "Yes Quorum" and differentiates it from the "Threshold," providing valuable information for users. The explanation is concise and informative, enhancing the document's clarity on governance mechanisms.
x/gov/types/v1/gov.pb.go (7)
- 995-999: The addition of the
YesQuorumfield in theParamsstruct is noted. Ensure that the corresponding documentation and usage logic for this new field are updated accordingly to reflect how this field impacts the governance process.- 1168-1173: The
GetYesQuorummethod has been added to theParamsstruct. Verify that this method is utilized appropriately in the governance logic, particularly in the calculation of quorum for proposals.- 1180-1193: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1183-1247]
The
MessageBasedParamsstruct now includes aYesQuorumfield. This change implies adjustments in the governance module to support message-based parameters with a distinct quorum requirement. Confirm that the implementation logic and documentation are updated to reflect this addition.
- 1963-1971: The
YesQuorumfield in theParamsstruct is serialized with a non-standard tag (field number 20 with wire type 2). Ensure that this serialization choice is intentional and compatible with the overall data structure design and usage within the Cosmos SDK.- 2170-2178: The serialization of the
YesQuorumfield in theMessageBasedParamsstruct uses a non-standard tag. Verify that this is consistent with the intended design and that it does not conflict with other fields or future extensions.- 4926-4957: The unmarshaling logic for the
YesQuorumfield in theParamsstruct is correctly implemented. Ensure that there are corresponding tests to verify the correct unmarshaling of this field, especially considering its non-standard tag.- 5140-5171: The unmarshaling logic for the
YesQuorumfield in theMessageBasedParamsstruct is correctly implemented. It's important to verify through testing that this field is correctly unmarshaled, given its significance in the governance process.tests/go.sum (17)
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-6]
The updates to
cloud.google.com/go/workflows,cosmossdk.io/*modules, and others in this hunk are standard version bumps. Ensure that these version updates are compatible with the project's requirements and do not introduce breaking changes.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [7-12]
Similar to the previous comment, this hunk updates versions for modules like
cosmossdk.io/mathandcosmossdk.io/store. Verify that these updates are in line with the project's dependencies and check for any breaking changes or major updates that might require additional changes in the codebase.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [13-18]
This hunk includes updates to
github.com/bufbuild/protocompile,github.com/casbin/casbin/v2, and others. It's crucial to ensure that these updates do not conflict with the project's existing protobuf definitions and access control configurations.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [19-24]
Updates to logging and hashing libraries such as
github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2andgit.luolix.top/chzyer/logexare noted. Confirm that the logging format and performance characteristics remain consistent with the project's requirements.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [25-30]
The update to
github.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyfromv1.5.4tov1.7.0could impact file watching functionality. Ensure that this update does not affect the project's ability to react to file system events.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [31-36]
Version bumps for localization and validation libraries like
github.com/go-playground/localesandgit.luolix.top/go-playground/validator/v10are present. Verify that these updates do not introduce changes that could affect form validation or internationalization features.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [37-42]
Updates to WebSocket and JSON libraries such as
github.com/gobwas/wsandgit.luolix.top/goccy/go-jsonare included. It's important to test WebSocket communication and JSON parsing to ensure that these library updates do not introduce regressions.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [43-48]
The update to
github.com/klauspost/compresscould impact compression performance or compatibility. Ensure that this update does not adversely affect data compression or decompression processes within the project.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [49-54]
Updates to text processing and URN handling libraries like
github.com/kr/textandgit.luolix.top/leodido/go-urnare noted. Confirm that these updates do not affect text manipulation or URN parsing functionalities.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [55-60]
This hunk includes updates to various libraries, including
github.com/stretchr/testifyfor testing. Ensure that the update tov1.8.4does not introduce any issues with the project's test suite.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [61-66]
Updates to networking and codec libraries such as
github.com/tidwall/btreeandgit.luolix.top/ugorji/go/codecare present. It's crucial to verify that these updates do not impact the project's networking capabilities or data encoding/decoding functionalities.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [67-72]
The updates to
golang.org/x/*libraries involve significant version bumps. These libraries are foundational, and their updates could have wide-ranging impacts. Thorough testing is recommended to ensure that these updates do not introduce any compatibility issues or regressions.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [73-78]
Similar to the previous comment, updates to
golang.org/x/*libraries are noted. Given the foundational nature of these libraries, confirm that the updates are compatible with the project's existing code and do not introduce breaking changes.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [79-84]
This hunk includes updates to
golang.org/x/*libraries, which are critical to the project. Ensure that these updates are thoroughly tested, especiallygolang.org/x/sysandgolang.org/x/term, to confirm that system-level interactions and terminal functionalities work as expected.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [85-90]
Updates to
golang.org/x/textandgolang.org/x/toolsare included in this hunk. These libraries are often used for internationalization and development tooling, respectively. Verify that these updates do not affect the project's i18n features or development workflows.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [91-96]
The update to
google.golang.org/protobuftov1.32.0is significant, as it could impact how protocol buffers are used within the project. Ensure compatibility with existing protobuf definitions and test extensively to confirm that serialization and deserialization work as expected.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [97-102]
This hunk includes updates to various libraries, including
pgregory.net/rapidfor rapid testing andrsc.io/quote/v3for quoting functionalities. Ensure that these updates do not introduce issues with testing or text processing.api/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.pulsar.go (28)
- 6390-6390: The addition of
fd_Params_yes_quorumfield descriptor is consistent with the PR's objective to enhance documentation and codebase clarity. However, ensure that the corresponding documentation and comments are updated to reflect this addition for maintainability.- 6415-6415: Initialization of
fd_Params_yes_quorumusingmd_Params.Fields().ByName("yes_quorum")is correct and follows the standard pattern for initializing field descriptors in Go protobufs. This change aligns with the PR's goal of fixing and updating the documentation and codebase.- 6597-6602: The conditional block checking for a non-empty
YesQuorumand its subsequent handling is implemented correctly. It adheres to the protobuf message handling pattern in Go. Ensure that unit tests cover scenarios with both empty and non-emptyYesQuorumvalues to verify this logic.- 6656-6657: The case handling for
cosmos.gov.v1.Params.yes_quorumin the switch statement is correctly implemented. It checks for the non-emptiness of theYesQuorumfield, which is a standard approach for such checks in Go. This addition should be covered in unit tests for comprehensive validation.- 6712-6713: Setting
x.YesQuorumto an empty string in the case ofcosmos.gov.v1.Params.yes_quorumis appropriate for clearing the field. This change is consistent with the protobuf message handling conventions in Go. Ensure that there are tests to verify the behavior of clearing this field.- 6796-6798: Retrieving the value of
YesQuorumas aprotoreflect.ValueOfStringis correctly implemented. This pattern is consistent with Go protobufs for handling string fields. It's important to ensure that theYesQuorumfield is properly documented in the code to align with the PR's objectives.- 6863-6864: Setting the
YesQuorumfield from aprotoreflect.Valueis correctly implemented. This approach is standard for mutating protobuf messages in Go. Documentation around this field should be clear and concise, reflecting its purpose and usage within the system.- 6944-6945: The panic in the case of attempting to mutate the immutable field
yes_quorumis correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of theParamsmessage by preventing unsupported operations. Documentation should clearly state the immutability of this field to avoid confusion.- 7003-7004: Returning a default
protoreflect.ValueOfString("")forYesQuorumin the absence of a value is correct and aligns with the handling of optional string fields in Go protobufs. This implementation should be accompanied by clear documentation explaining the default behavior.- 7153-7156: The calculation of the serialized size for
YesQuorumis correctly implemented, following the protobuf encoding rules. This change should be verified with tests that check the serialized size of messages with variousYesQuorumvalues to ensure correctness.- 7186-7194: The serialization logic for
YesQuorumis correctly implemented, adhering to the protobuf wire format specifications. It's crucial to have tests that serialize messages with and withoutYesQuorumto validate this logic under different scenarios.- 8023-8054: The unmarshalling logic for
YesQuorumis correctly implemented, including error handling for incorrect wire types and length validations. This is a critical part of protobuf message handling in Go, and it should be thoroughly tested, especially the error paths.- 8094-8094: The addition of
fd_MessageBasedParams_yes_quorumand related field descriptors is consistent with the PR's objectives. Ensure that the corresponding documentation is updated to reflect these additions, maintaining clarity and accessibility of the codebase.- 8104-8104: Initialization of field descriptors for
MessageBasedParams, includingyes_quorum, is correctly done. This aligns with the protobuf handling conventions in Go. Documentation updates should accompany these changes to ensure clarity.- 8186-8191: The conditional handling of
YesQuorumwithinMessageBasedParamsis implemented correctly. It's important to cover this logic with unit tests, ensuring that both cases (empty and non-emptyYesQuorum) are handled as expected.- 8223-8224: The case handling for
yes_quoruminMessageBasedParamsis correctly implemented, following the standard pattern for such checks in Go. Comprehensive testing should be conducted to ensure this logic works as intended under various scenarios.- 8249-8250: Clearing the
YesQuorumfield inMessageBasedParamsby setting it to an empty string is appropriate and follows Go protobuf message handling conventions. This operation should be clearly documented and tested to verify its behavior.- 8277-8279: Retrieving the
YesQuorumvalue as aprotoreflect.ValueOfStringinMessageBasedParamsis correctly implemented. This approach is consistent with Go protobufs handling of string fields. Ensure that theYesQuorumfield is properly documented.- 8310-8311: Setting the
YesQuorumfield from aprotoreflect.ValueinMessageBasedParamsis correctly implemented. This standard approach for mutating protobuf messages in Go should be accompanied by clear documentation explaining the field's purpose and usage.- 8343-8344: The panic for attempting to mutate the immutable field
yes_quoruminMessageBasedParamsis correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the message by preventing unsupported operations. Documentation should clearly state the immutability of this field.- 8367-8368: Returning a default
protoreflect.ValueOfString("")forYesQuoruminMessageBasedParamsis correct. This implementation should be clearly documented to explain the default behavior when the field is not set.- 8450-8453: The calculation of the serialized size for
YesQuoruminMessageBasedParamsis correctly implemented. Ensure that this logic is covered by tests to verify the correctness under various scenarios.- 8491-8499: The serialization logic for
YesQuoruminMessageBasedParamsis correctly implemented. Testing this logic thoroughly is crucial, especially to validate the behavior whenYesQuorumis set and when it's not.- 8652-8683: The unmarshalling logic for
YesQuoruminMessageBasedParams, including error handling and length validations, is correctly implemented. This critical part of protobuf message handling should be thoroughly tested, particularly the error paths.- 9746-9750: The documentation for the
YesQuorumfield inParamsis clear and specifies the default behavior. This aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance documentation clarity. Ensure that all related documentation is updated to reflect this addition.- 9906-9911: The
GetYesQuorummethod forParamsis correctly implemented, providing a safe way to access theYesQuorumfield. This method enhances the code's maintainability and usability, aligning with the PR's goals.- 9925-9932: The documentation and implementation of
YesQuoruminMessageBasedParamsare clear and follow the protobuf conventions in Go. Ensure that the documentation accurately reflects the purpose and usage of this field, maintaining the clarity and accessibility of the codebase.- 9970-9975: The
GetYesQuorummethod forMessageBasedParamsis correctly implemented. This method follows the standard pattern for accessing fields in Go protobufs, enhancing the code's maintainability and clarity.
samricotta
force-pushed
the
sam/broken-links
branch
from
92b3f73 to
40b99b1
Compare
| @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ appd tx send <recipientAddress> 1000uatom --from <senderAddress> --gas auto --ga | |||
|
|
|||
| #### Other Transaction Creation Methods | |||
|
|
|||
| The command-line is an easy way to interact with an application, but `Tx` can also be created using a [gRPC or REST interface](../advanced/06-grpc_rest.md) or some other entry point defined by the application developer. From the user's perspective, the interaction depends on the web interface or wallet they are using (e.g. creating `Tx` using [Lunie.io](https://lunie.io/#/) and signing it with a Ledger Nano S). | |||
samricotta
force-pushed
the
sam/broken-links
branch
from
b4e72fa to
c480cb5
Compare
github-actions
bot
removed
C:x/staking
C:CLI
C:x/gov
C:x/slashing
C:x/distribution
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (50)
- CHANGELOG.md (7 hunks)
- CODING_GUIDELINES.md (2 hunks)
- CONTRIBUTING.md (3 hunks)
- RELEASE_PROCESS.md (1 hunks)
- ROADMAP.md (1 hunks)
- UPGRADING.md (3 hunks)
- docs/Introduction.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/README.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-016-validator-consensus-key-rotation.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-022-custom-panic-handling.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-031-msg-service.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-033-protobuf-inter-module-comm.md (2 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-034-account-rekeying.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-038-state-listening.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-040-storage-and-smt-state-commitments.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-042-group-module.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-048-consensus-fees.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-049-state-sync-hooks.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-054-semver-compatible-modules.md (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-059-test-scopes.md (2 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-062-collections-state-layer.md (2 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-063-core-module-api.md (2 hunks)
- docs/build/abci/00-introduction.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/abci/01-prepare-proposal.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/abci/02-process-proposal.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/abci/03-vote-extensions.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/building-apps/04-security-part-1.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/building-modules/00-intro.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/building-modules/01-module-manager.md (2 hunks)
- docs/build/building-modules/03-msg-services.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/building-modules/06-keeper.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/building-modules/15-depinject.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/building-modules/16-testing.md (2 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/00-baseapp.md (5 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/01-transactions.md (3 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/02-context.md (1 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/03-node.md (2 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/05-encoding.md (2 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/06-grpc_rest.md (2 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/07-cli.md (5 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/08-events.md (2 hunks)
- docs/learn/beginner/00-app-anatomy.md (5 hunks)
- docs/learn/beginner/01-tx-lifecycle.md (4 hunks)
- docs/learn/beginner/02-query-lifecycle.md (4 hunks)
- docs/learn/beginner/03-accounts.md (1 hunks)
- docs/learn/beginner/04-gas-fees.md (1 hunks)
- docs/learn/intro/02-sdk-app-architecture.md (1 hunks)
- docs/spec/store/README.md (1 hunks)
- store/snapshots/README.md (1 hunks)
- x/README.md (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (49)
- CHANGELOG.md
- CODING_GUIDELINES.md
- CONTRIBUTING.md
- RELEASE_PROCESS.md
- ROADMAP.md
- UPGRADING.md
- docs/Introduction.md
- docs/architecture/adr-016-validator-consensus-key-rotation.md
- docs/architecture/adr-022-custom-panic-handling.md
- docs/architecture/adr-031-msg-service.md
- docs/architecture/adr-033-protobuf-inter-module-comm.md
- docs/architecture/adr-034-account-rekeying.md
- docs/architecture/adr-038-state-listening.md
- docs/architecture/adr-040-storage-and-smt-state-commitments.md
- docs/architecture/adr-042-group-module.md
- docs/architecture/adr-048-consensus-fees.md
- docs/architecture/adr-049-state-sync-hooks.md
- docs/architecture/adr-054-semver-compatible-modules.md
- docs/architecture/adr-059-test-scopes.md
- docs/architecture/adr-062-collections-state-layer.md
- docs/architecture/adr-063-core-module-api.md
- docs/build/abci/00-introduction.md
- docs/build/abci/01-prepare-proposal.md
- docs/build/abci/02-process-proposal.md
- docs/build/abci/03-vote-extensions.md
- docs/build/building-apps/04-security-part-1.md
- docs/build/building-modules/00-intro.md
- docs/build/building-modules/01-module-manager.md
- docs/build/building-modules/03-msg-services.md
- docs/build/building-modules/06-keeper.md
- docs/build/building-modules/15-depinject.md
- docs/build/building-modules/16-testing.md
- docs/learn/advanced/00-baseapp.md
- docs/learn/advanced/01-transactions.md
- docs/learn/advanced/02-context.md
- docs/learn/advanced/03-node.md
- docs/learn/advanced/05-encoding.md
- docs/learn/advanced/06-grpc_rest.md
- docs/learn/advanced/07-cli.md
- docs/learn/advanced/08-events.md
- docs/learn/beginner/00-app-anatomy.md
- docs/learn/beginner/01-tx-lifecycle.md
- docs/learn/beginner/02-query-lifecycle.md
- docs/learn/beginner/03-accounts.md
- docs/learn/beginner/04-gas-fees.md
- docs/learn/intro/02-sdk-app-architecture.md
- docs/spec/store/README.md
- store/snapshots/README.md
- x/README.md
Additional comments: 1
docs/architecture/README.md (1)
- 63-63: Corrected the filename from
adr-070-unordered-account.mdtoadr-070-unordered-transactions.mdto accurately reflect the content of the ADR.
Description
This PR addresses the broken links identified by the md-link-checker workflow throughout the repo. By fixing these links, we aim to ensure that the
md-link-checkeraction passes successfully, improving the documentation's reliability and accessibility.Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit