-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: consensus spinout #20010
chore: consensus spinout #20010
Conversation
Important Auto Review SkippedReview was skipped due to path filters Files ignored due to path filters (2)
You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe update involves migrating the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
bc69c61
to
6aa689c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ import ( | |||
"cosmossdk.io/x/bank" | |||
bankkeeper "cosmossdk.io/x/bank/keeper" | |||
banktypes "cosmossdk.io/x/bank/types" | |||
consensustypes "cosmossdk.io/x/consensus/types" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding tests that specifically cover interactions between the consensus and distribution modules if the consensus logic impacts distribution operations.
Would you like me to help draft some test cases that cover the interactions between the consensus and distribution modules?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should be adding vanity url to consensus module
merged here |
cosmossdk.io/x/auth v0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000 | ||
github.com/cometbft/cometbft v0.38.7-0.20240412124004-1f67e396cf45 | ||
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-proto v1.0.0-beta.5 | ||
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk v0.51.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this permissible? for x/consensus to depend the sdk.. what in the sdk module does it need?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's used in tests and a few other places. We need to spend some time undoing the sdk import before final release.
Description
this pr spins the consensus module into its own go.mod
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Refactor
Bug Fixes