Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: replace error-handling code for potential wrapped errors #20214

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

tuantran1702
Copy link
Contributor

@tuantran1702 tuantran1702 commented Apr 29, 2024

Description

Refactor error values according to this guideline:
https://go.dev/wiki/ErrorValueFAQ#how-should-i-change-my-error-handling-code-to-work-with-the-new-features


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced error handling across various components by adopting more robust error comparison methods.

@tuantran1702 tuantran1702 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 29, 2024 15:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes encompass improving error handling practices by incorporating modern Go conventions such as errors.Is and errors.As for error comparison and type assertion, respectively. These updates aim to boost the robustness and ease of maintenance of error management throughout the codebase.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/secp256_test.go Added errors import; updated error comparison to use errors.Is.
x/group/internal/orm/table_test.go Enhanced error handling logic by utilizing errors.Is for error comparison.
x/upgrade/plan/downloader.go Improved handling of ChecksumError by replacing type assertion check with errors.As.

Possibly related issues


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b4f60f and 8f7b220.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/group/internal/orm/table_test.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • x/group/internal/orm/table_test.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Comment on lines +33 to +34
var checksumError *getter.ChecksumError
if errors.As(err, &checksumError) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replace direct return of err with a more descriptive error or handle it differently after type assertion with errors.As.

- return err
+ return fmt.Errorf("checksum error: %w", err)

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
var checksumError *getter.ChecksumError
if errors.As(err, &checksumError) {
var checksumError *getter.ChecksumError
if errors.As(err, &checksumError) {
return fmt.Errorf("checksum error: %w", err)

@tuantran1702 tuantran1702 changed the title refactor: replace direct comparision with error.Is() refactor: replace error-handling code for potential wrapped errors Apr 29, 2024
auto-merge was automatically disabled April 30, 2024 11:00

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@facundomedica facundomedica added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 8a36d9d Apr 30, 2024
59 of 60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants