feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing
#21525
Conversation
cool-develope
requested review from
a team,
facundomedica,
akhilkumarpilli,
lucaslopezf,
kocubinski,
julienrbrt,
sontrinh16,
hieuvubk,
aaronc and
testinginprod
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
C:CLI
C:Store
C:x/params
C:x/upgrade
C:x/group
C:x/nft
C:orm
C:collections
C:server/v2
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@cool-develope has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes primarily involve updating the database instantiation across multiple test files from Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Test as Test Function
participant DB as Database
participant CoreTesting as CoreTesting Utility
Test->>CoreTesting: Initialize Database
CoreTesting-->>Test: Return New MemDB Instance
Test->>DB: Perform Test Operations
DB-->>Test: Return Results
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
store/db/utils.go (1)
16-20: Simplify the function by directly returning the result ofmake([]byte, len(bz)).The function can be simplified as follows:
-func cp(bz []byte) (ret []byte) { - ret = make([]byte, len(bz)) - copy(ret, bz) - return ret +func cp(bz []byte) []byte { + return append([]byte(nil), bz...) }store/go.mod (2)
8-8: Review the changelog and migration guide ofcosmossdk.io/core.The
cosmossdk.io/coredependency has been updated tov1.0.0, which is a major version update. This suggests potential breaking changes or new functionalities.Please review the changelog and migration guide of
cosmossdk.io/coreto understand the impact of this update on the codebase. Pay close attention to any breaking changes and ensure that the necessary adjustments are made in the code to accommodate these changes.
54-54: Review the changelog ofgit.luolix.top/syndtr/goleveldb.The
github.com/syndtr/goleveldbdependency has been updated tov1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6d.Please review the changelog of
github.com/syndtr/goleveldbto understand the changes introduced in this version and their potential impact on the codebase. Pay attention to any breaking changes or deprecations and ensure that the code is adjusted accordingly if needed.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
collections/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumcore/testing/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumruntime/v2/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumstore/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (78)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (19 hunks)
- baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (3 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12 hunks)
- baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (5 hunks)
- baseapp/regression_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
- client/v2/go.mod (1 hunks)
- collections/collections.go (1 hunks)
- collections/go.mod (1 hunks)
- collections/indexing.go (1 hunks)
- core/testing/go.mod (1 hunks)
- core/testing/goleveldb.go (1 hunks)
- core/testing/memdb.go (4 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1 hunks)
- orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (3 hunks)
- runtime/v2/go.mod (2 hunks)
- server/mock/app.go (2 hunks)
- server/mock/store_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/cometbft/config.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (2 hunks)
- server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1 hunks)
- simapp/app_test.go (5 hunks)
- simapp/go.mod (2 hunks)
- simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- store/cache/cache_test.go (6 hunks)
- store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store.go (1 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (5 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store_test.go (7 hunks)
- store/db/errors.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/prefixdb.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/utils.go (1 hunks)
- store/dbadapter/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/gaskv/store_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/go.mod (1 hunks)
- store/iavl/store_test.go (18 hunks)
- store/iavl/tree_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/listenkv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/mem/store.go (2 hunks)
- store/mock/core_store.go (1 hunks)
- store/prefix/store_test.go (8 hunks)
- store/pruning/manager_test.go (9 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (6 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/store.go (5 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/store_test.go (21 hunks)
- store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/snapshots/store.go (4 hunks)
- store/snapshots/store_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/tracekv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/transient/store.go (2 hunks)
- store/types/iterator_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (1 hunks)
- testutil/context.go (4 hunks)
- testutil/integration/router.go (3 hunks)
- testutil/network/network.go (2 hunks)
- testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2 hunks)
- testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
- testutils/sims/runner.go (2 hunks)
- types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3 hunks)
- types/query/pagination.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/group/go.mod (4 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/nft/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/params/go.mod (2 hunks)
- x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/upgrade/go.mod (2 hunks)
- x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- collections/collections.go
- collections/indexing.go
- docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md
- server/v2/cometbft/config.go
- simapp/go.mod
- store/db/errors.go
- store/mock/core_store.go
- tests/go.mod
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (58)
server/mock/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/db/utils.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/transient/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/regression_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/mem/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.testutil/context.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/types/iterator_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cache/cache_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/gaskv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"types/query/pagination.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/mock/app.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/integration/router.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutils/sims/runner.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/test_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/db/prefixdb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/pruning/manager_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"core/testing/memdb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.simapp/app_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cachekv/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/snapshots/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.core/testing/goleveldb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/prefix/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"baseapp/utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cachekv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/iavl/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/network/network.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/baseapp_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/rootmulti/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/rootmulti/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Additional comments not posted (278)
core/testing/go.mod (3)
10-10: LGTM!The added dependency
github.com/spf13/castis a well-known and widely used string casting library for Go. The version is pinned to a specific release, which is a good practice.
11-11: LGTM!The added dependency
github.com/syndtr/goleveldbis a well-known and widely used key/value database in pure Go. The version is pinned to a specific commit hash, which is a good practice for reproducibility.
15-15: LGTM!The added indirect dependency
github.com/golang/snappyis a well-known and widely used compression library. The version is pinned to a specific release, which is a good practice. The dependency is marked as indirect, which means it is not directly used by the module but is a dependency of one of the direct dependencies.collections/go.mod (3)
16-16: LGTM!The added indirect dependency
github.com/golang/snappyat versionv0.0.4is approved.
18-18: LGTM!The added indirect dependency
github.com/spf13/castat versionv1.7.0is approved.
19-19: Verify the reason for using a specific commit ofgit.luolix.top/syndtr/goleveldb.The added indirect dependency
github.com/syndtr/goleveldbuses a pseudo-version numberv1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6d, which refers to a specific commit rather than a tagged release.Please confirm if there is a specific reason for using this particular commit, such as a critical bug fix or a required feature, that is not available in the latest tagged release.
server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1)
19-21: Verify the impact of reintroducing theminimum-gas-pricesparameter.The
minimum-gas-pricesparameter has been reintroduced in the[server]section. This parameter is used to define the minimum gas price that a validator is willing to accept for processing a transaction.Ensure that reintroducing this parameter does not have any unintended consequences on the server operation and the transaction processing.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the
minimum-gas-pricesparameter:server/mock/store_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The import statement change is approved. It reflects the transition from using
cosmos-dbtocore/testingfor in-memory database instantiation.
13-13: LGTM!The database instantiation change is approved. It aligns with the import statement change and enhances the testing framework.
store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement change aligns with the change in the
NewMemDBfunction usage.
15-15: LGTM!The code change aligns with the import statement change and does not introduce any issues in the test.
store/db/utils.go (1)
6-14: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The function
IsKeyInDomainis correctly implemented and follows the Uber Go Style Guide.store/transient/store.go (3)
22-22: LGTM!The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of removing the
cosmos-dbcomponent and standardizes the testing framework by usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
28-28: LGTM!The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of removing the
cosmos-dbcomponent and standardizes the testing framework by usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
Line range hint
1-54: Code style looks good!The Go code in this file follows the Uber Go Style Guide. There are no deviations from the style guide.
baseapp/regression_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The changes in the import statements are consistent with the PR objective of removing the
cosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase. Thecoretestingpackage is being used as a replacement for thedbmpackage.
30-30: LGTM!The change in the database initialization is consistent with the updated import statements. It leverages the
coretestingpackage for creating an in-memory database for testing purposes.store/mem/store.go (2)
6-7: LGTM!The changes to the import statements are approved. The new imports from the
cosmossdk.io/core/storeandcosmossdk.io/core/testingpackages are consistent with the shift in the underlying database implementation used in the store.
27-30: Verify the usage of theNewStoreWithDBfunction in the codebase.The changes to the
NewStoreandNewStoreWithDBfunctions are approved. The changes are consistent with the shift in the underlying database implementation used in the store.However, the changes to the
NewStoreWithDBfunction signature may affect the callers of this function. Please ensure that all calls toNewStoreWithDBare updated to match the new signature.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
NewStoreWithDBfunction:Verification successful
Verification successful: No issues found with
NewStoreWithDBusage.The
NewStoreWithDBfunction is only called withinstore/mem/store.go, and the call matches the new signature. No other calls to this function exist in the codebase, so no further updates are necessary.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to `NewStoreWithDB` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewStoreWithDB'Length of output: 514
testutil/context.go (4)
22-22: LGTM!The code change is approved. The usage of
coretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the goal of transitioning to the new memory database implementation for testing purposes.
42-42: LGTM!The code change is approved. The usage of
coretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the goal of transitioning to the new memory database implementation for testing purposes.
67-67: LGTM!The code change is approved. The change in the
DBfield type tocorestore.KVStoreWithBatchsuggests an enhancement in the database's capabilities, which aligns with the goal of leveraging updated database functionalities.
73-73: LGTM!The code change is approved. The usage of
coretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the goal of transitioning to the new memory database implementation for testing purposes.store/go.mod (3)
9-9: LGTM!Adding the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency is a good move to enhance the testing framework with utilities related to the core module.
63-65: Ensure the stability of local module versions.The
replacedirectives have been added forcosmossdk.io/coreandcosmossdk.io/core/testing, pointing to local paths. This suggests that the development is being done against local versions of these modules.While using local module versions is a common practice during development, it's crucial to ensure that these versions are stable and well-tested before integrating them into the codebase. Please verify that the local module versions have undergone thorough testing and are ready for use in production.
3-3: Verify compatibility of all dependencies with Go 1.23.Upgrading to Go 1.23 is a good move to leverage new features and performance improvements. However, it's crucial to ensure that all dependencies are compatible with this new Go version.
Run the following script to verify the compatibility:
tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
19-19: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the import statement change and the AI-generated summary.Using the
coretestingpackage for database instantiation in tests may provide the following benefits:
- Enhanced functionality or integration with the Cosmos SDK testing framework.
- Standardization of database usage across tests.
- Potential improvements in test execution or performance characteristics.
The overall structure and logic of the test remain intact, ensuring that the test coverage is maintained.
store/types/iterator_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. Utilizing the
coretestingpackage fromcosmossdk.io/core/testingaligns with the goal of enhancing the testing framework and maintaining consistency across the codebase.
17-17: LGTM!The changes in the
newMemTestKVStorefunction are approved. The usage ofcoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the updated import statement and maintains the function's expected behavior of returning atypes.KVStoreloaded with a memory database.simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement follows the Uber Golang style guide and is necessary for the change in the
BenchmarkFullAppSimulationfunction.
90-90: LGTM!The change from
dbm.GoLevelDBtocoretesting.GoLevelDBis consistent with the import statement change and is likely aimed at leveraging a different testing framework or library that is more suited for the current testing requirements. This change is part of a broader effort to remove thecosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase, as referenced in issue #21373.The change follows the Uber Golang style guide and is likely to have sufficient code coverage, as it is part of a benchmarking test for a full application simulation. However, it is important to note that this change may affect how statistics are printed and potentially the performance characteristics being measured.
store/cache/cache_test.go (1)
19-19: Verify the behavior of the newNewMemDB()implementation.Ensure that the new
coretesting.NewMemDB()implementation behaves similarly to the previousdbm.NewMemDB()implementation to maintain the integrity of the test.Run the following script to compare the behavior of the two implementations:
store/dbadapter/store_test.go (3)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement change from
github.com/golang/mock/gomocktogo.uber.org/mock/gomockis approved. It aligns with the Uber Golang style guide.
23-23: LGTM!The mock database instance change from
mock.NewMockDB(mockCtrl)tomock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch(mockCtrl)is approved. It enhances the testing of functionalities that require batch processing of database operations and is consistent with the updated import statement.
78-78: LGTM!The mock database instance change to
mock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch(mockCtrl)is approved. It is consistent with the update in theTestAccessorsfunction and the updated import statement, indicating a transition to a more specialized mock for testing database interactions.testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. The transition to the
coretestingpackage fromcosmossdk.io/core/testingaligns with the current architecture of the Cosmos SDK and potentially enhances test reliability or performance.
118-118: LGTM!The changes in the
initTestStoresfunction are approved. The shift fromdbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for instantiating the memory database is consistent with the updated import statements and reflects the transition to the new testing framework.store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. The shift from using the
dbmpackage to thecoretestingpackage for the memory database instantiation aligns with the broader goal of removing thecosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase.
17-17: LGTM!The change in the database object instantiation from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved. It aligns with the updated import statements and the broader goal of removing thecosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase.store/gaskv/store_test.go (5)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement follows the Uber Golang style guide.
21-21: LGTM!The change is consistent with the import statement change and does not affect the test coverage.
41-41: LGTM!The change is consistent with the import statement change and does not affect the test coverage.
106-106: LGTM!The change is consistent with the import statement change and does not affect the test coverage.
113-113: LGTM!The change is consistent with the import statement change and does not affect the test coverage.
x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (1)
8-8: LGTM! The changes enhance the testing framework by usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().The shift from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for in-memory database initialization suggests a move towards a more integrated or specialized testing framework provided by thecoretestingpackage. This change may affect how tests are conducted, particularly in terms of database behavior and performance during the test suite execution.The addition of the import statement for
coretestingat line 8 is consistent with the new database initialization and reflects the dependency on thecosmossdk.io/core/testingpackage for the test suite's functionality.Also applies to: 42-42
types/query/pagination.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The changes to the import statements are approved. The removal of the
dbimport and the addition of thecorestoreimport reflect the transition to a different storage or database interface.
129-129: Verify the impact of the return type change on the codebase.The return type of the
getIteratorfunction has been changed fromdb.Iteratortocorestore.Iterator. This change indicates a shift in the underlying implementation of the iterator and could affect how the iterator is utilized throughout the code, particularly in terms of compatibility with other components that interact with the iterator.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
getIteratorfunction and thecorestore.Iteratortype in the codebase:Verification successful
The return type change of
getIteratortocorestore.Iteratoris consistent and does not introduce issues.The change aligns with the existing usage of
corestore.Iteratorthroughout the codebase, and no compatibility issues were found in the usage ofgetIterator. The update appears to be part of a broader refactoring to standardize the iterator type.
- Usage of
getIteratorintypes/query/pagination.goandtypes/query/filtered_pagination.gois consistent with the new return type.corestore.Iteratoris widely used across the codebase, indicating a standardized approach.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `getIterator` function and the `corestore.Iterator` type in the codebase. # Test 1: Search for the usage of the `getIterator` function. Expect: Only occurrences with the new return type. rg --type go -A 5 $'getIterator' # Test 2: Search for the usage of the `corestore.Iterator` type. Expect: Only valid usages. rg --type go -A 5 $'corestore\.Iterator'Length of output: 21818
store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (4)
6-6: LGTM!The import statement is correct and aligns with the package usage in the file.
18-18: LGTM!The change aligns with the pull request objective of replacing the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with
core/testing.
48-48: LGTM!The changes align with the pull request objective of replacing the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with
core/testing.Also applies to: 71-71
102-102: LGTM!The change aligns with the pull request objective of replacing the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with
core/testing.x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (1)
99-99: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the goal of removing thecosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase. It standardizes the usage of in-memory databases in tests without altering the overall structure or logic of the test.types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3)
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
166-166: LGTM!The change in the
dbfield type fromdb.DBtostore.KVStoreWithBatchis consistent with the overall transition to a more advanced key-value store interface, as described in the AI-generated summary. This modification enhances the testing capabilities by leveraging the additional functionality provided bystore.KVStoreWithBatch.The rest of the
testStoreimplementation has been updated accordingly to use the methods fromstore.KVStoreWithBatch, ensuring compatibility with the new interface.
200-200: LGTM!The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for instantiating the in-memory database in thedeps()function is consistent with the transition to a new testing utility, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This new testing utility likely provides improved or different features for creating a mock database environment.The rest of the
deps()function remains unchanged, ensuring compatibility with the new testing utility.store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (3)
8-8: LGTM!The new import statement for
coretestingis necessary to use thecoretesting.NewMemDB()function in the test setup.
17-17: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the updated testing framework or utility. The rest of the test logic remains intact.
61-61: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the updated testing framework or utility in bothTestVerifyMultiStoreQueryProofandTestVerifyMultiStoreQueryProofAbsencetest functions. The rest of the test logic remains intact.Also applies to: 117-117
runtime/v2/go.mod (2)
Line range hint
1-103: Verify the impact of removing thegit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency.Ensure that the removal of the
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency does not break any functionality or tests.Run the following script to verify the impact:
104-104: Verify the reason for replacing thegit.luolix.top/cosmos/iavldependency and its impact.Please provide more context on why the
github.com/cosmos/iavldependency is being replaced with a specific version. Also, ensure that replacing the dependency does not introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues.Run the following script to verify the impact:
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)
34-34: LGTM!The code changes are approved. They are consistent with the PR objective of removing the
cosmos-dbcomponent and transitioning tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for in-memory database instantiation.baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (4)
36-36: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
68-68: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
101-101: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
138-138: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
server/mock/app.go (2)
17-17: LGTM!The import changes are approved. The shift from using the
dbpackage to thecoretestingpackage for database initialization in tests is a good move towards standardizing the testing framework and improving reliability.
33-33: LGTM!The changes to the
NewAppfunction are approved. Utilizing thecoretesting.NewGoLevelDBmethod for creating the GoLevelDB instance in tests aligns with the import changes and contributes to the standardization of the testing framework. This change promotes consistency and reliability in database usage during testing.store/listenkv/store_test.go (3)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correct.
41-41: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()in thenewEmptyListenKVStorefunction is correct and aligns with the pull request objective.
268-268: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()in theTestListenKVStoreGetStoreTypefunction is correct and aligns with the pull request objective.tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2)
25-25: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. The removal of the
dbmpackage import and the addition of thecoretestingpackage import indicate a shift in the database implementation used for testing purposes, likely to enhance testing capabilities or align with new standards in the codebase.
171-171: LGTM!The database instantiation change is approved. The usage of
coretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the import statement changes and is consistent with the shift in the database implementation used for testing purposes.testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3)
13-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
114-114: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
220-220: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The import statement change aligns with the objective of removing the
cosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase.
110-110: LGTM!The change in the database instantiation aligns with the objective of removing the
cosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase and enhances the testing framework by standardizing database usage.testutil/integration/router.go (2)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correctly added.
57-57: LGTM!The database initialization logic is correctly updated to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB(). This change is consistent across theNewIntegrationAppandCreateMultiStorefunctions and aligns with the goal of transitioning to thecosmossdk.io/core/testingpackage for testing purposes.Also applies to: 204-204
x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM!The import statement for
coretestingis necessary to use thecoretesting.NewMemDB()function in the test setup.
35-35: Looks good! Verify if similar changes are needed in other test files.The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in the test setup is approved. It potentially enhances the test environment's capabilities or aligns it with updated testing practices.To ensure consistency, please verify if similar changes are required in other test files that use
dbm.NewMemDB(). You can use the following script to search for such occurrences:#!/bin/bash # Search for test files using dbm.NewMemDB() rg --type go --glob '*_test.go' 'dbm.NewMemDB\(\)'If the script yields results, consider updating those test files to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()as well.tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)
12-13: LGTM!The import statements have been updated to include
corestoreandcoretestingfromcosmossdk.io/core, suggesting a shift towards utilizing a more integrated testing framework.
126-126: LGTM!The database is now instantiated using
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB(), aligning it with the new testing framework.
Line range hint
192-205: LGTM!The
clearDBfunction signature has been modified to accept a parameter of typecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinstead of*dbm.MemDB, indicating a broader compatibility with the new database abstraction. This allows for more flexible database operations within the test suite.store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The import statement is necessary to use the
coretesting.NewMemDB()function in theTestManager_TakeErrorfunction.
252-252: LGTM!The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database is consistent with the AI-generated summary. It enhances the test's reliability and compatibility with the Cosmos SDK's core testing utilities without altering the overall logic or control flow of the test.testutils/sims/runner.go (2)
14-14: LGTM!The new import statement for
coretestingis valid and does not introduce any issues. It likely provides testing utilities or types related to the Cosmos SDK's core functionalities.
140-140: LGTM!The change in the
RunWithSeedsfunction to usecoretesting.GoLevelDBinstead ofdbm.GoLevelDBis valid and does not introduce any issues. It suggests a shift in the underlying database implementation used for statistics printing, potentially enhancing compatibility or functionality with the Cosmos SDK's testing framework.tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2)
15-15: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correct.
105-105: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for instantiating the in-memory database is approved. This change aligns with the goal of leveraging the new testing utility provided by thecoretestingpackage, potentially improving test reliability or performance.store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM!The import change is approved as it is necessary to use the
coretesting.NewMemDB()function in the test functions.
41-41: LGTM!The code changes are approved as they are consistent with the objective of transitioning from using
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for in-memory database instantiation in tests. The changes do not introduce new functionalities or alter existing control flows significantly.Also applies to: 279-279
store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)
17-17: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correctly added.
210-210: LGTM!The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the updated testing framework and dependencies. The usage of the newNewMemDB()function is correct within the context of thesetupBusyManagerfunction.server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (1)
50-50: LGTM!The dependency changes are approved:
- The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency aligns with the transition to usingcoretesting.NewMemDB()for in-memory database instantiation in tests.- The removal of the
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency eliminates the module's reliance on this package.These changes are focused on testing and do not affect the module's core functionality.
store/snapshots/store_test.go (3)
13-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
20-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
45-45: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 51-51
simapp/test_helpers.go (5)
14-15: LGTM!The new import statements for
core/storeandcore/testingare approved.
39-39: LGTM!The change in the
DBfield type tocorestore.KVStoreWithBatchis approved. This update aligns with the transition to thecorepackage and enables batch operations for improved performance.
44-44: LGTM!The update in the database instantiation to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()is approved. This change aligns with the transition to thecore/testingpackage and ensures consistency with the new database interface.
238-238: LGTM!The update in the
NewSimAppconstructor call to usecoretesting.NewMemDB()for the database is approved. This change aligns with the transition to thecore/testingpackage and ensures consistency with the new database interface.
242-242: LGTM!The update in the
NewSimAppconstructor call within theappCtrfunction to usecoretesting.NewMemDB()for the database is approved. This change aligns with the transition to thecore/testingpackage and ensures consistency with the new database interface.x/nft/go.mod (1)
28-28: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingpackage as an indirect dependency is approved.store/db/prefixdb.go (16)
1-9: LGTM!The package declaration and imports are good.
11-16: LGTM!The
PrefixDBstruct and its fields are well-defined.
20-26: LGTM!The
NewPrefixDBfunction is a simple constructor that initializes thePrefixDBinstance correctly.
28-41: LGTM!The
Getmethod correctly handles the empty key case, prepends the prefix to the key, and returns the value from the underlying KVStore.
43-55: LGTM!The
Hasmethod is implemented correctly, handling the empty key case and prepending the prefix to the key.
57-64: LGTM!The
Setmethod is implemented correctly, handling the empty key case and prepending the prefix to the key before setting the value.
66-73: LGTM!The
Deletemethod is implemented correctly, handling the empty key case and prepending the prefix to the key before deleting it.
75-94: LGTM!The
Iteratormethod is implemented correctly. It handles the empty start and end key cases, prepends the prefix to the keys, and creates a newprefixIteratorwith the underlying iterator.
96-115: LGTM!The
ReverseIteratormethod is implemented correctly, similar to theIteratormethod. It handles the empty start and end key cases, prepends the prefix to the keys, and creates a newprefixIteratorwith the underlying reverse iterator.
117-125: LGTM!The
NewBatchandNewBatchWithSizemethods are simple wrappers that create a newprefixBatchwith the prefix and the underlying batch.
127-133: LGTM!The
Closemethod correctly closes the underlying KVStore and uses a mutex to synchronize access.
135-150: LGTM!The
152-154: LGTM!The
prefixedmethod is a simple helper method that prepends the prefix to a given key.
156-172: LGTM!The
IteratePrefixfunction is a convenient way to iterate over a key domain restricted by a prefix. It correctly creates the start and end keys based on the prefix and creates an iterator using them.
175-182: LGTM!The
prefixDBIteratorstruct is well-defined with appropriate fields for the prefix, start and end keys, source iterator, validity, and error.
186-212: LGTM!The
newPrefixIteratorfunction correctly creates a newprefixDBIterator. It skips the prefix key if it exactly matches the prefix and checks the validity of the iterator and the expected prefix.store/pruning/manager_test.go (7)
21-21: LGTM!The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.
82-82: LGTM!The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.
189-189: LGTM!The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.
203-203: LGTM!The change from
mock.NewMockDB(ctrl)tomock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch(ctrl)suggests an enhancement in the mock database's capabilities, likely to support batch operations.
224-224: LGTM!The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.
256-256: LGTM!The changes from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()are consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.Also applies to: 283-283
297-297: LGTM!The changes from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()are consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.Also applies to: 302-302
x/params/go.mod (2)
8-8: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency with a pseudo-version is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the testing framework by utilizing testing utilities from the Cosmos SDK core package.
56-56: LGTM!The change in the
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency, moving it from the main require block to the indirect require block, is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of removing thecosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase by making it an indirect dependency.client/v2/go.mod (1)
174-174: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingindirect dependency looks good.x/group/go.mod (2)
8-8: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency aligns with the PR objective of replacing thecosmos-dbuse cases in tests withcore/testing.
68-68: LGTM!The restructuring of the
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency aligns with the PR objective of removing thecosmos-dbcomponent from the codebase. The change streamlines direct dependencies while still maintaining the availability ofcosmos-dbthrough indirect means.core/testing/memdb.go (12)
19-23: LGTM!The new error variables
errValueNilanderrBatchClosedimprove error handling for batch operations by providing specific errors for nil values and closed batches.
262-265: LGTM!The
MemDBtype extendsMemKVto support batch operations.
267-270: LGTM!The
NewMemDBfunction correctly initializes a newMemDBinstance and returns it as astore.KVStoreWithBatchinterface.
272-275: LGTM!The
Closemethod is a no-op implementation as there are no resources to release inMemDB.
277-280: LGTM!The
NewBatchmethod correctly initializes a newmemDBBatchinstance for theMemDB.
301-306: LGTM!The
memDBBatchtype correctly encapsulates the necessary fields for handling in-memory batching.
310-317: LGTM!The
newMemDBBatchfunction correctly initializes a newmemDBBatchinstance with the providedMemDB.
319-333: LGTM!The
Setmethod correctly handles adding a new set operation to the batch with appropriate error checks for empty keys, nil values, and closed batches.
335-346: LGTM!The
Deletemethod correctly handles adding a new delete operation to the batch with appropriate error checks for empty keys and closed batches.
348-367: LGTM!The
Writemethod correctly executes the batch operations on the associatedMemDBwith appropriate error handling and batch closure.
369-372: LGTM!The
WriteSyncmethod correctly delegates the execution of batch operations to theWritemethod.
374-386: LGTM!The
CloseandGetByteSizemethods correctly handle the closure and size retrieval of the batch with appropriate error checks.store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (5)
17-17: LGTM!The import statement change is approved.
128-128: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved.
170-170: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved.
192-193: LGTM!The changes from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()are approved.
243-243: LGTM!The changes from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()in the benchmark functions are approved.Also applies to: 249-249, 279-279, 285-285
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)
99-99: Switching tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for in-memory database in tests.The change in the
DefaultStartUpConfigfunction switches theDBfield from usingdbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for creating an in-memory database instance. This shift leverages the testing utilities provided by thecoretestingpackage, potentially introducing new features or optimizations.The change is small, isolated, and unlikely to have any negative impact on the existing functionality. It aligns with the broader goal of enhancing the testing framework's integration within the application.
x/upgrade/go.mod (1)
71-71: Verify the impact of the dependency change.The direct dependency on
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbhas been removed and reintroduced as an indirect dependency. This suggests that the module is no longer directly required for the primary functionality but is still needed for transitive dependencies.Please confirm that this change does not introduce any issues in the build process or dependency resolution. You can use the following script to verify the dependencies:
simapp/app_test.go (4)
16-16: LGTM!The import statement change is approved.
46-46: LGTM!The database initialization change is approved.
88-88: LGTM!The database initialization change is approved.
233-233: LGTM!The database initialization change is approved.
store/cachekv/store.go (1)
11-11: Clarify the rationale behind changing the import path for thedbmpackage.The import statement for the
dbmpackage has been changed from"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db"to"cosmossdk.io/store/db". This suggests a shift in the source of the database management package, likely to align with a new organizational structure or to utilize a more appropriate package within thecosmossdkecosystem.Please clarify the rationale behind this change and its implications on the overall functionality. Are there any compatibility issues or behavioral changes expected due to this shift?
store/snapshots/store.go (5)
17-17: LGTM!The new import statement for the
corestorepackage is approved.
30-30: LGTM!The change in the
dbfield type to usecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchis approved.
38-38: LGTM!The change in the
dbparameter type to usecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchis approved.
63-63: Verify the impact of the change fromDeleteSynctoDelete.Ensure that the change from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operation does not introduce any unintended side effects or race conditions in the codebase.
Run the following script to search for potential issues:
337-337: Verify the impact of the change fromSetSynctoSet.Ensure that the change from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operation does not introduce any unintended side effects or race conditions in the codebase.
Run the following script to search for potential issues:
core/testing/goleveldb.go (21)
1-18: Package declaration and imports look good.The file is correctly placed in the
coretestingpackage and imports relevant dependencies.
20-27:GoLevelDBstruct looks good.It correctly wraps
*leveldb.DBto implement thecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinterface.
30-32:DBOptionsinterface looks good.It provides a generic way to retrieve database options.
34-47:NewGoLevelDBfunction looks good.It provides a convenient way to create a new
GoLevelDBinstance with default or custom options.
49-56:NewGoLevelDBWithOptsfunction looks good.It provides a lower-level way to create a new
GoLevelDBinstance with custom options.
59-71:Getfunction looks good.It correctly implements the
Getmethod of theKVStoreinterface, handling key not found and error cases.
74-76:Hasfunction looks good.It correctly implements the
Hasmethod of theKVStoreinterface.
79-87:Setfunction looks good.It correctly implements the
Setmethod of theKVStoreinterface, handling empty key and nil value cases.
90-98:SetSyncfunction looks good.It correctly implements the
SetSyncmethod of theKVStoreinterface, handling empty key and nil value cases.
101-106:Deletefunction looks good.It correctly implements the
Deletemethod of theKVStoreinterface, handling the empty key case.
109-114:DeleteSyncfunction looks good.It correctly implements the
DeleteSyncmethod of theKVStoreinterface, handling the empty key case.
116-118:RawDBfunction looks good.It provides access to the underlying
leveldb.DBinstance for advanced use cases.
121-123:Closefunction looks good.It correctly implements the
Closemethod of theKVStoreinterface.
126-140:It correctly implements the
KVStoreinterface, printing database stats and key-value pairs.
143-162:Statsfunction looks good.It correctly implements the
Statsmethod of theKVStoreinterface, returning database stats.
164-166:ForceCompactfunction looks good.It provides a way to manually trigger database compaction.
169-176:NewBatchandNewBatchWithSizefunctions look good.They correctly implement the
NewBatchandNewBatchWithSizemethods of theBatchCreatorinterface.
179-194:IteratorandReverseIteratorfunctions look good.They correctly implement the
IteratorandReverseIteratormethods of theKVStoreinterface, handling empty key cases.
196-204:goLevelDBIteratorstruct looks good.It correctly wraps
iterator.Iteratorto implement thecorestore.Iteratorinterface.
206-234:newGoLevelDBIteratorfunction looks good.It provides a convenient way to create a new
goLevelDBIteratorinstance with the correct start position based on thestartkey andisReverseflag.
237-328: Iterator methods look good.The methods correctly implement the
Iteratorinterface, handling invalid iterator and key range cases.orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (3)
363-364: LGTM!The change in the return type from
store.KVStoretocorestore.KVStoreis consistent with the overall refactoring effort to consolidate the codebase.
367-368: LGTM!The change in the return type from
store.KVStoretocorestore.KVStoreis consistent with the overall refactoring effort to consolidate the codebase.
397-398: LGTM!The change in the return type from
store.KVStoreServicetocorestore.KVStoreServiceis consistent with the overall refactoring effort to consolidate the codebase.store/prefix/store_test.go (5)
10-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
93-93: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
102-102: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
108-108: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 154-154, 184-184, 212-212
243-243: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 442-442
baseapp/utils_test.go (1)
209-209: Verify the impact of changing thedbfield's type in theparamStorestruct.The
dbfield's type has been changed from*dbm.MemDBtocorestore.KVStoreWithBatch. This change indicates a shift in the underlying database implementation, likely enhancing theparamStore's capabilities by allowing batch operations.The overall functionality of the
paramStoremay be affected by this change, as it could influence how data is stored and retrieved, particularly in scenarios where batch processing is beneficial.Please verify the
paramStore's usage across the codebase to ensure compatibility with the newcorestore.KVStoreWithBatchtype. Run the following script to check for any potential issues:Verification successful
Change to
corestore.KVStoreWithBatchinparamStoreis verified.The
paramStorestruct'sdbfield has been updated to usecorestore.KVStoreWithBatch, enhancing its capabilities with batch operations. This change is primarily used in test files, and no issues were found with its usage across the codebase. The tests appear to be correctly validating the new implementation.
- The
paramStoreis used in test files such asx/upgrade/keeper/keeper_test.go,baseapp/abci_test.go, andbaseapp/baseapp_test.go.- The change is verified to be compatible with existing test scenarios.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `paramStore` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the `paramStore` type usage. # Expect: No issues with the new `corestore.KVStoreWithBatch` type. rg --type go -A 5 $'paramStore'Length of output: 9442
store/cachekv/store_test.go (4)
10-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
18-18: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
26-26: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
69-69: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 77-77, 293-293, 310-310, 329-329, 377-377, 437-437
store/iavl/store_test.go (19)
15-15: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
62-62: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
124-124: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
157-157: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
180-180: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
205-205: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
216-216: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
289-289: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
323-323: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
386-386: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
453-453: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
471-471: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
583-583: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
613-613: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
618-623: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
627-638: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
645-645: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
660-660: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
672-672: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (12)
22-22: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The
coretestingpackage is correctly imported.
480-480: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The
BaseAppis correctly instantiated usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
Line range hint
581-762: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
764-773: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
775-807: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
809-817: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
819-843: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
849-851: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
853-859: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
861-863: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
100-141: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
Line range hint
144-182: Skipped review!The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.
testutil/network/network.go (1)
223-223: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for instantiating the in-memory database aligns with the PR objective of removing thecosmos-dbcomponent and usingcore/testinginstead. This change suggests that the new implementation from thecoretestingpackage may provide enhanced testing capabilities or better alignment with the testing framework.baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12)
17-17: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correctly added.
71-71: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theNewBaseAppSuitefunction.
81-81: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theNewBaseAppSuitefunction.
99-99: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in thegetQueryBaseappfunction.
119-119: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theNewBaseAppSuiteWithSnapshotsfunction.
238-238: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theTestLoadVersionfunction.
361-361: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theTestSetLoaderfunction.
390-390: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theTestVersionSetterGetterfunction.
413-413: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theTestLoadVersionInvalidfunction.
450-450: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theTestOptionFunctionfunction.
699-699: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theTestABCI_CreateQueryContextfunction.
845-845: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is correctly made in theTestLoadVersionPruningfunction.store/rootmulti/store_test.go (19)
13-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
25-25: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
31-31: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
48-48: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
64-64: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
72-72: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
125-125: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
155-155: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
208-208: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
357-357: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
436-436: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
530-530: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
562-562: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
603-603: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
656-656: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
672-672: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
696-696: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
715-715: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.
731-731: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The old
dbm.NewMemDB()is correctly replaced withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.store/rootmulti/store.go (7)
19-19: Looks good!The import changes are approved.
Also applies to: 22-22
631-631: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing thecacheStoreis approved.
1021-1021: Approved!The changes to remove type assertions when initializing the
dbare approved.Also applies to: 1024-1024
1243-1243: Approved!The change to use
corestore.Batchin theflushCommitInfofunction signature is approved.
1256-1256: Looks good!The change to use
corestore.Batchin theflushLatestVersionfunction signature is approved.
Line range hint
1-1262: Conforms to the Uber Golang style guideThe entire file conforms to the Uber Golang style guide. No deviations were found.
Line range hint
1-1262: Code changes are consistent with the summaryThe code changes are consistent with the AI-generated summary. No inconsistencies were found.
baseapp/abci_test.go (12)
107-107: LGTM!The import of
cosmossdk.io/core/testinglooks good.
207-207: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database looks good.
224-224: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database looks good.
246-246: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database looks good.
313-313: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database looks good.
331-331: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the parameter store looks good.
396-396: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database looks good.
409-409: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the parameter store looks good.
529-529: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database looks good.
540-540: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the parameter store looks good.
558-558: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database looks good.
569-569: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the parameter store looks good.
| // NewBatchWithSize returns a new memDBBatch with the given size. | ||
| func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(size int) store.Batch { | ||
| return newMemDBBatch(db) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the inconsistency between the method name and implementation.
The NewBatchWithSize method ignores the size parameter, which is inconsistent with the method name and signature.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(size int) store.Batch {
+func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(_ int) store.Batch {
return newMemDBBatch(db)
}Alternatively, consider removing the NewBatchWithSize method if it's not needed.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // NewBatchWithSize returns a new memDBBatch with the given size. | |
| func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(size int) store.Batch { | |
| return newMemDBBatch(db) | |
| } | |
| // NewBatchWithSize returns a new memDBBatch with the given size. | |
| func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(_ int) store.Batch { | |
| return newMemDBBatch(db) | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (7)
server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1)
19-21: Theminimum-gas-pricessetting is integrated into the application logic, but documentation updates are needed.The
minimum-gas-pricessetting is actively used in the application code, as evidenced by its presence in various Go files related to configuration and transaction fee handling. However, the documentation does not explicitly mention this setting, which could lead to confusion for developers and users.Please ensure that:
The documentation is updated to explicitly mention the
minimum-gas-pricessetting and its role in transaction fee management.The current implementation is reviewed to confirm that the setting's value of
0stakeis appropriate and does not have unintended consequences.Code References:
tools/confix/migrations.gox/auth/ante/fee.goserver/v2/config.goserver/config/config_test.goAnalysis chain
Verify the impact of the
minimum-gas-pricessetting on the application.The
minimum-gas-pricessetting has been reintroduced under the[server]section with a value of0stake. This suggests a potential shift in how transaction fees are managed within the application.Please ensure that:
- The application logic correctly handles the
minimum-gas-pricessetting.- The value of
0stakeis appropriate and does not have any unintended consequences on the transaction fee requirements.- The documentation is updated to reflect the changes in the transaction fee management.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the
minimum-gas-pricessetting:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `minimum-gas-prices` setting in the application. # Test 1: Search for the usage of the `minimum-gas-prices` setting in the application code. # Expect: The setting is correctly read and used in the transaction fee validation logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'minimum-gas-prices' # Test 2: Search for the documentation related to the transaction fee management. # Expect: The documentation is updated to reflect the changes in the transaction fee management. fd -e md -X rg -i $'transaction fee'Length of output: 5947
store/go.mod (1)
9-9: Review the usage ofcosmossdk.io/core/testing.The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingpackage suggests the introduction of new testing utilities. Review the codebase to understand how this package is being utilized and ensure that it enhances the testing capabilities.Consider adding documentation or examples to showcase the usage of the new testing package.
store/snapshots/manager_test.go (1)
252-252: Updatedb.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()instore/v2/root/factory_test.go.The occurrence of
db.NewMemDB()instore/v2/root/factory_test.goshould be updated tocoretesting.NewMemDB()to maintain consistency across test files and leverage the new testing utility.
- File:
store/v2/root/factory_test.go- Line: Contains
db.NewMemDB()Analysis chain
Looks good! Verify if similar changes are needed in other test files.
The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved as it leverages the new testing utility from thecoretestingpackage.To ensure consistency, please verify if similar changes are required in other test files. You can use the following script to search for occurrences of
db.NewMemDB()in test files:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences of `db.NewMemDB()` in test files. # Test: Search for the pattern in test files. Expect: Occurrences in other test files that may require similar changes. rg --type go --glob '*_test.go' $'db\.NewMemDB\(\)'Length of output: 110
x/params/go.mod (2)
8-8: New testing dependency added.The
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency has been added to the project.The version is set to a pseudo-version
v0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000. Is this intentional? If not, consider using a specific version or a version constraint.
56-56: Discrepancy incosmos-dbdependency management.The
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency is marked as indirect in thego.modfile, but it is directly imported in several files across the codebase. This inconsistency suggests thatcosmos-dbshould be listed as a direct dependency.
- Files with direct imports:
testutils/sims/runner.gotestutil/sims/simulation_helpers.goserver/util.goserver/util_test.goserver/start.goserver/constructors_test.goorm/model/ormtable/bench_test.goorm/model/ormtable/table_test.goorm/model/ormdb/module_test.goorm/internal/testkv/leveldb.goorm/internal/testkv/mem.goclient/snapshot/restore.goclient/pruning/main.goPlease review the dependency management to ensure consistency between the
go.modfile and the actual usage in the codebase.Analysis chain
cosmos-dbdependency changed from direct to indirect.The
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency has been moved from a direct requirement to an indirect one.What is the reason for this change? Are there any implications of making
cosmos-dban indirect dependency?To verify the usage of
cosmos-dbin the codebase, run the following script:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `cosmos-db` in the codebase. # Test: Search for import statements of `cosmos-db`. Expect: No direct imports. rg --type go $'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db'Length of output: 841
x/upgrade/go.mod (1)
71-71: Revert the removal of the direct dependency ongit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-db.The module
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbis still being imported in several files across the codebase, indicating that it is a necessary direct dependency. Removing it could lead to broken imports and functionality. Please ensure that this dependency is properly managed to avoid any issues.
testutils/sims/runner.gotestutil/sims/simulation_helpers.goserver/util_test.goserver/util.goserver/start.goserver/constructors_test.goorm/model/ormdb/module_test.goorm/internal/testkv/leveldb.goorm/model/ormtable/table_test.goorm/model/ormtable/bench_test.goorm/internal/testkv/mem.goclient/snapshot/restore.goclient/pruning/main.goAnalysis chain
Verify the impact of removing the direct dependency on
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db.Ensure that removing this direct dependency does not break any existing code or introduce any unintended consequences. Confirm that the removal aligns with the project's goals and requirements.
To verify the impact, consider running the following script:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that removing the direct dependency on `github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db` does not break any existing code. # Test: Search for import statements of `github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db` in Go files. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go $'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db'Length of output: 841
store/cachekv/store.go (1)
11-11: Complete the transition to the newdbmpackage import path.The import path for the
dbmpackage has been updated to"cosmossdk.io/store/db"in some files, but the old path"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db"is still present in several others. This indicates an incomplete transition, which could lead to inconsistencies. Please ensure that:
- All occurrences of the old import path are updated to the new path.
- The API compatibility between the old and new paths is verified.
- Any necessary code adjustments are made to accommodate changes in the package structure.
Files still using the old import path include:
testutils/sims/runner.gotestutil/sims/simulation_helpers.goserver/util_test.goserver/util.goserver/start.goserver/constructors_test.goorm/model/ormdb/module_test.goorm/model/ormtable/bench_test.goorm/model/ormtable/table_test.goorm/internal/testkv/leveldb.goorm/internal/testkv/mem.goclient/snapshot/restore.goclient/pruning/main.goAnalysis chain
Verify the impact of updating the
dbmpackage import.The import statement for the
dbmpackage has been updated from"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db"to"cosmossdk.io/store/db". This change suggests a potential restructuring or reorganization of the codebase.Please verify the following:
- The new import path is correct and the package is available at the specified location.
- The API of the
dbmpackage remains unchanged or the necessary updates have been made in the codebase to accommodate any changes.- Downstream dependencies that rely on the
dbmpackage from the old import path have been updated accordingly.You can use the following script to search for occurrences of the old import path in the codebase:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for occurrences of the old dbm import path rg --type go $'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db'Length of output: 841
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for occurrences of the new dbm import path rg --type go $'cosmossdk.io/store/db'Length of output: 916
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
collections/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumcore/testing/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumruntime/v2/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumstore/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (78)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (19 hunks)
- baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (3 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12 hunks)
- baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (5 hunks)
- baseapp/regression_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
- client/v2/go.mod (1 hunks)
- collections/collections.go (1 hunks)
- collections/go.mod (1 hunks)
- collections/indexing.go (1 hunks)
- core/testing/go.mod (1 hunks)
- core/testing/goleveldb.go (1 hunks)
- core/testing/memdb.go (4 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1 hunks)
- orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (3 hunks)
- runtime/v2/go.mod (2 hunks)
- server/mock/app.go (2 hunks)
- server/mock/store_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/cometbft/config.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (2 hunks)
- server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1 hunks)
- simapp/app_test.go (5 hunks)
- simapp/go.mod (2 hunks)
- simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- store/cache/cache_test.go (6 hunks)
- store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store.go (1 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (5 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store_test.go (7 hunks)
- store/db/errors.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/prefixdb.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/utils.go (1 hunks)
- store/dbadapter/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/gaskv/store_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/go.mod (1 hunks)
- store/iavl/store_test.go (18 hunks)
- store/iavl/tree_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/listenkv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/mem/store.go (2 hunks)
- store/mock/core_store.go (1 hunks)
- store/prefix/store_test.go (8 hunks)
- store/pruning/manager_test.go (9 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (6 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/store.go (5 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/store_test.go (21 hunks)
- store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/snapshots/store.go (4 hunks)
- store/snapshots/store_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/tracekv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/transient/store.go (2 hunks)
- store/types/iterator_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (1 hunks)
- testutil/context.go (4 hunks)
- testutil/integration/router.go (3 hunks)
- testutil/network/network.go (2 hunks)
- testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2 hunks)
- testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
- testutils/sims/runner.go (2 hunks)
- types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3 hunks)
- types/query/pagination.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/group/go.mod (4 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/nft/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/params/go.mod (2 hunks)
- x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/upgrade/go.mod (2 hunks)
- x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- client/v2/go.mod
- collections/collections.go
- collections/indexing.go
- runtime/v2/go.mod
- server/v2/cometbft/config.go
- simapp/go.mod
- store/db/errors.go
- store/mock/core_store.go
- tests/go.mod
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (59)
server/mock/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/db/utils.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/transient/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/regression_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/mem/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.testutil/context.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/types/iterator_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cache/cache_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/gaskv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"types/query/pagination.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/mock/app.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/integration/router.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutils/sims/runner.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/test_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/db/prefixdb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/pruning/manager_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"core/testing/memdb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.simapp/app_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cachekv/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/snapshots/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.core/testing/goleveldb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/prefix/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"baseapp/utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"store/cachekv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/iavl/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/network/network.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/baseapp_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/rootmulti/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/rootmulti/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Additional comments not posted (246)
core/testing/go.mod (3)
10-10: LGTM!The addition of the
github.com/spf13/castdependency at versionv1.7.0is approved.
11-11: LGTM!The addition of the
github.com/syndtr/goleveldbdependency at versionv1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6dis approved.
15-15: LGTM!The addition of the
github.com/golang/snappydependency at versionv0.0.4as an indirect dependency is approved.collections/go.mod (3)
16-16: LGTM!The addition of the
github.com/golang/snappypackage as an indirect dependency is approved.
18-18: LGTM!The addition of the
github.com/spf13/castpackage as an indirect dependency is approved.
19-19: Verify the usage of the pre-release version.The added version
v1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6dis a pre-release version. Please ensure that the pre-release version is intended and does not introduce any instability or compatibility issues.server/mock/store_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The import statement for
coretestingpackage is correctly added.
13-13: LGTM!The database initialization is correctly changed to use
coretesting.NewMemDB().Verify that
coretesting.NewMemDB()is a drop-in replacement fordbm.NewMemDB()and does not affect the behavior of the test. Run the following script to check if the test still passes after the change:Verification successful
Verified:
coretesting.NewMemDB()is a suitable replacement fordbm.NewMemDB().The extensive use of
coretesting.NewMemDB()across the codebase and the absence ofdbm.NewMemDB()suggest thatcoretesting.NewMemDB()is the intended utility for in-memory database creation in tests. This change aligns with the current codebase practices.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test still passes after changing the database initialization. # Test: Run the test. Expect: The test should pass. go test -run TestStore ./server/mock/...Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of coretesting.NewMemDB() ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewMemDB() { $$$ }' # Find the implementation of dbm.NewMemDB() ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewMemDB() { $$$ }'Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for NewMemDB in the context of coretesting rg 'NewMemDB' --context 5 --glob '*coretesting*' # Search for NewMemDB in the context of dbm rg 'NewMemDB' --context 5 --glob '*dbm*'Length of output: 387
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for NewMemDB across the entire repository rg 'NewMemDB' --context 5Length of output: 124224
store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
15-15: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The usage of
NewMemDBfromcore/testingpackage aligns with the PR objective and does not affect the test logic.store/db/utils.go (2)
6-14: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
16-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
store/transient/store.go (2)
22-22: LGTM!The code change is approved. The transition from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration to thecoretestingpackage for in-memory database management.
28-28: LGTM!The code change is approved. The transition from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration to thecoretestingpackage for in-memory database management.baseapp/regression_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The import statement change from
dbmtocoretestingis approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests withcore/testing.
30-30: LGTM!The database instantiation change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests withcore/testing.store/mem/store.go (3)
6-7: LGTM!The import statements have been updated to use the
corestoreandcoretestingpackages fromcosmossdk.ioinstead of thedbmpackage fromgit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-db. This change is consistent with the PR objective of removingcosmos-dbfrom the codebase.
27-27: LGTM!The
NewStorefunction has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for instantiating the memory database. This change is consistent with the updated import statements and the PR objective of removingcosmos-dbfrom the codebase.
30-31: LGTM!The
NewStoreWithDBfunction signature has been updated to accept a parameter of typecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinstead ofdbm.MemDB. This change indicates a shift in the underlying data structure used for the store, likely enhancing compatibility with the new core store architecture. The function implementation remains intact, but the parameter type has been updated to reflect the new dependency.testutil/context.go (4)
Line range hint
21-32: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The usage of
coretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the PR objective.
Line range hint
38-61: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The usage of
coretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the PR objective.
64-68: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The usage of
corestore.KVStoreWithBatchfor theDBfield is consistent with the PR objective.
Line range hint
70-83: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The usage of
coretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the PR objective.store/go.mod (3)
3-3: Verify compatibility with Go 1.23.Ensure that the codebase is compatible with the new Go version and all tests pass.
Run the following script to verify the compatibility:
8-8: Verify compatibility withcosmossdk.io/corev1.0.0.Thoroughly test the codebase to ensure compatibility with the new major version of
cosmossdk.io/core.Run the following script to verify the compatibility:
63-63: Verify local packages are up to date.The
replacedirectives are pointing to local paths forcosmossdk.io/coreandcosmossdk.io/core/testing. Ensure that the local packages are up to date and in sync with the remote versions to avoid any discrepancies.Run the following script to verify the local packages:
Also applies to: 65-65
tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM!The import statement is approved.
19-19: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved.Verify that
coretesting.NewMemDB()is consistently used in other test files:store/types/iterator_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. The shift from
dbmtocoretestingaligns with the goal of removingcosmos-dbfrom the codebase and enhancing the testing framework.
17-17: LGTM!The changes in the
newMemTestKVStorefunction are approved. The updated instantiation of the memory database usingcoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the new import statements and maintains the function's intended behavior.simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement is approved.
90-90: LGTM!The change is approved as it is consistent with the migration to the
coretestingpackage.Verify the impact on the performance metrics.
Please ensure that the change does not negatively impact the performance metrics collected during the benchmark.
store/cache/cache_test.go (6)
10-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
19-19: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
32-32: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
45-45: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
71-71: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
91-91: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)
23-23: LGTM!The change from
mock.NewMockDBtomock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatchenhances the specificity of the mock used in the test, aligning it more closely with the actual implementation of the database adapter.
78-78: LGTM!The change from
mock.NewMockDBtomock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatchis consistent with the change made in theTestAccessorsfunction and enhances the specificity of the mock used in the test.testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. The transition from using the
dbmpackage to thecoretestingpackage for in-memory database management aligns with the goal of removing thecosmos-dbdependency from the codebase.
118-118: LGTM!The changes in the
initTestStoresfunction are approved. The usage ofcoretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()aligns with the updated import statements and the goal of migrating away from thecosmos-dbdependency.store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM!The change in the import statement from
dbmtocoretestingis approved. This aligns with the ongoing effort to removecosmos-dbfrom the codebase and enhance the testing framework.
17-17: LGTM!The change in the database instantiation from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved. This change is consistent with the updated import statement and aligns with the transition to thecoretestingpackage for database management in tests.store/gaskv/store_test.go (4)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement change is approved.
21-21: LGTM!The memory database initialization change is approved.
41-41: LGTM!The memory database initialization change is approved.
106-106: LGTM!The memory database initialization changes in
TestGasKVStoreOutOfGasSetandTestGasKVStoreOutOfGasIteratorare approved.Also applies to: 113-113
x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The import statement change from
dbmtocoretestingis approved.
42-42: LGTM!The database instantiation change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved.types/query/pagination.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The import changes are approved as they align with the PR objective of replacing
cosmos-dbwithcore/store.
Line range hint
129-141: Verify the compatibility ofcorestore.Iteratorwith the existing pagination logic.The function signature change is approved as it reflects the shift in the underlying storage mechanism.
Ensure that the
corestore.Iteratoris fully compatible with the existing pagination logic and does not introduce any unintended side effects or performance regressions.Run the following script to verify the compatibility:
store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (4)
6-6: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
18-18: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
48-48: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 71-71
102-102: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (1)
99-99: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the PR objective of replacingcosmos-dbusecases in the tests withcore/testing. The change does not alter the logic of the test and adheres to the Uber Go Style Guide.types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3)
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
200-200: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
166-166: Verify the impact of the change on thetestStoreimplementation.The
dbfield in thetestStorestruct has been changed fromdb.DBtostore.KVStoreWithBatch. This is a significant modification that affects the entiretestStoreimplementation.Ensure that the methods of the
testStorestruct have been updated to use the newdbfield type correctly.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
testStorestruct and its methods in the codebase:Verification successful
Verification successful: The
testStoreimplementation correctly uses thestore.KVStoreWithBatchtype.The change in the
dbfield type fromdb.DBtostore.KVStoreWithBatchhas been implemented correctly. The methods of thetestStorestruct are using thedbfield appropriately, and there are no issues with the current implementation.
- The
testStorestruct and its methods are correctly updated to use thestore.KVStoreWithBatchtype.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `testStore` struct and its methods in the codebase. # Test 1: Search for the declaration of the `testStore` struct. # Expect: The `db` field should have the type `store.KVStoreWithBatch`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type testStore struct { $$$ db store.KVStoreWithBatch $$$ }' # Test 2: Search for the usage of the `testStore` struct and its methods. # Expect: The methods should use the `db` field correctly. rg --type go -A 5 $'testStore'Length of output: 33410
store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (3)
17-17: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration to thecoretestingpackage for database management in tests. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating thatcoretesting.NewMemDB()is a drop-in replacement.
61-61: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration to thecoretestingpackage for database management in tests. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating thatcoretesting.NewMemDB()is a drop-in replacement.
117-117: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration to thecoretestingpackage for database management in tests. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating thatcoretesting.NewMemDB()is a drop-in replacement.simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)
34-34: LGTM! The change enhances the testing framework.The replacement of
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()for instantiating the in-memory database is a positive change. It aligns with the PR objective of migrating from thecosmos-dbpackage to thecore/testingpackage.This change enhances the testing capabilities and performance of the application during command execution by utilizing a testing-oriented memory database implementation.
baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (4)
10-10: LGTM!The import statement change aligns with the migration from
cosmos-dbtocore/testingfor database management in tests.
36-36: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration tocore/testingfor database management in tests. It does not alter the test's behavior.
68-68: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration tocore/testingfor database management in tests. It does not alter the test's behavior.
101-101: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration tocore/testingfor database management in tests. It does not alter the test's behavior.server/mock/app.go (2)
17-17: LGTM!The import statement change is approved as it aligns with the migration from the
cosmos-dbpackage to thecore/testingpackage for database management in tests.
33-33: Verify the impact of the database instantiation change on the tests.Ensure that the tests relying on the
NewAppfunction and the database instantiation logic are still functioning as expected after the migration to thecoretestingpackage.Run the following script to verify the impact of the change:
store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)
41-41: LGTM!The change is consistent with the migration from the
dbmpackage to thecoretestingpackage for in-memory database management in tests.
268-268: LGTM!The change is consistent with the migration from the
dbmpackage to thecoretestingpackage for in-memory database management in tests.tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2)
25-25: LGTM!The addition of the
coretestingpackage to the import statements is approved. It will likely provide enhanced testing capabilities or utilities.
171-171: LGTM!The change in the database initialization from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved. It aligns with the updated import statements and ensures a consistent approach to database instantiation across the testing framework.testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3)
13-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
114-114: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
220-220: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The change in import statements, replacing
dbmwithcoretesting, is approved. This change aligns with the goal of migrating from thecosmos-dbpackage to thecore/testingpackage for database management in tests.
110-110: LGTM!The change in memory database instantiation, using
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB(), is approved. This change aligns with the updated import statements and the goal of migrating from thecosmos-dbpackage to thecore/testingpackage for database management in tests.testutil/integration/router.go (3)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement for
coretestinghas been correctly added.
204-204: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration effort.
57-57: Verify the impact on the tests.The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the migration effort. Ensure that all the relevant tests are passing with this change.Run the following script to verify the test results:
x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM!The import statement change from
dbmtocoretestingaligns with the PR objective of replacing thecosmos-dbuse cases in the tests withcore/testing.
35-35: LGTM!The database instantiation change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the updated import statement and enhances the testing capabilities.tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)
12-13: LGTM!The import changes are approved. The shift towards using the
coretestingpackage for a testing-specific memory database implementation and thecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinterface for enhanced database operations with batch support looks good.
126-126: LGTM!The database instantiation change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the import changes and reflects the shift towards using the testing-specific memory database implementation.
192-192: LGTM!The
clearDBfunction signature change is approved. Acceptingcorestore.KVStoreWithBatchaligns with the other changes and allows the function to work with the new database interface that supports batch operations.testutils/sims/runner.go (2)
14-14: LGTM!The new import statement for
coretestingis necessary to use thecoretesting.GoLevelDBtype in theRunWithSeedsfunction. It aligns with the migration from thedbmpackage to thecoretestingpackage for database management in tests.
140-140: LGTM!The change in the database type from
dbm.GoLevelDBtocoretesting.GoLevelDBis consistent with the migration from thedbmpackage to thecoretestingpackage. It enhances the testing capabilities and aligns with updated standards in the Cosmos SDK.tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2)
15-15: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correct.
105-105: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theappBuilder.Buildfunction call is consistent with the import statement change. This shift towards using thecoretestingpackage for database initialization in tests aligns with the overall testing framework enhancement mentioned in the PR summary.store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)
41-41: LGTM!The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing
cosmos-dbusecases in the tests withcore/testing.
279-279: LGTM!The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing
cosmos-dbusecases in the tests withcore/testing.store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (3)
17-17: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is valid and follows the correct syntax and naming conventions.
210-210: Approve the migration tocoretesting.NewMemDB().The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is a positive move towards using the specialized testing utilities provided by thecoretestingpackage. This can enhance the testing framework and improve the reliability of tests.The modification is localized to the test helper function and does not impact the core functionality of the
snapshots.Manager. The rest of thesetupBusyManagerfunction remains intact, ensuring that the snapshot creation process is still properly tested.
Line range hint
1-314: Assess unit test code coverage.The
store/snapshots/helpers_test.gofile contains various test helper functions and mock implementations that support testing the snapshot functionality. While the file itself does not contain direct unit tests, it provides a foundation for writing comprehensive tests for the snapshot manager and related components.To ensure adequate test coverage, consider the following:
Verify that the
setupBusyManagerfunction is being used in relevant test cases to set up a snapshot manager with a busy snapshot creation process. This helps test scenarios where snapshot operations are in progress.Ensure that the mock implementations, such as
mockSnapshotter,mockErrorSnapshotter, andextSnapshotter, are utilized in unit tests to cover different snapshot behaviors, error cases, and extension snapshots.Review the unit tests in other files that use the test helpers and mocks defined in this file. Ensure that the tests cover a wide range of scenarios, including successful snapshot creation, restoration, pruning, and error handling.
Consider adding more test cases to cover edge cases, boundary conditions, and potential failure points in the snapshot management process.
By thoroughly testing the snapshot functionality using the helpers and mocks provided in this file, you can improve the overall test coverage and ensure the reliability of the snapshot manager implementation.
server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (1)
50-50: LGTM!The addition of the
core/testingdependency aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the testing framework. The version indicates that it is a local dependency, which is a common practice in Go projects.store/snapshots/store_test.go (4)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement follows the Uber style guide and is necessary to support the change to
coretesting.NewMemDB().
45-45: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()in the test functions is consistent with the import and the update insetupStore. It improves consistency in database initialization across the test code. The error handling also follows the Uber style guide.Also applies to: 51-51
Line range hint
1-285: Sufficient test coverage.The unit tests in this file comprehensively cover the functionalities of the
Store. The changes to usecoretesting.NewMemDB()are exercised by all the tests as they are in the setup and initialization code. Therefore, the existing tests should provide sufficient coverage for the changes in this pull request.
20-20: Verify if updates are needed in dependent code.The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the import and suggests utilizing an enhanced testing utility. Ensure that any code depending on theStorecreated insetupStoreis compatible with this change.Run the following script to verify if updates are needed:
Verification successful
No updates needed in dependent code.
The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()insetupStoreis confined to test files and does not impact production code. The tests are compatible with this change, utilizing the enhanced testing utilities provided by thecoretestingpackage. No further updates are required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if code depending on the `Store` created in `setupStore` needs updates. # Test: Search for usage of `setupStore`. Expect: Only test code using the returned `Store`. rg --type go -A 10 $'setupStore'Length of output: 21507
simapp/test_helpers.go (5)
14-15: LGTM!The imports are necessary for the changes made in the file to use the new database handling.
39-39: LGTM!The change to the
DBfield type in theSetupOptionsstruct indicates a shift towards a more flexible and potentially more efficient storage mechanism.
44-44: LGTM!The change to instantiate the database using
coretesting.NewMemDB()in thesetupfunction implies a transition to a testing-specific implementation of the memory database.
238-238: LGTM!The change to instantiate the database using
coretesting.NewMemDB()in theNewTestNetworkFixturefunction is similar to the one made in thesetupfunction and implies a transition to a testing-specific implementation of the memory database.
242-242: LGTM!The change to instantiate the database using
coretesting.NewMemDB()in theappCtrfunction is similar to the ones made in thesetupandNewTestNetworkFixturefunctions and implies a transition to a testing-specific implementation of the memory database.x/nft/go.mod (1)
28-28: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency is appropriate for enhancing the module's testing capabilities.store/db/prefixdb.go (4)
12-154: ThePrefixDBstruct and its methods look good!The implementation correctly wraps a namespace of another database as a logical database and follows the expected behavior of a
KVStore. The methods handle the prefix correctly and delegate the operations to the underlying database. The code also adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.
158-172: TheIteratePrefixfunction looks good!The function correctly handles the prefix and returns an iterator over the restricted key domain. The code also adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.
175-279: TheprefixDBIteratorstruct and its methods look good!The implementation correctly strips prefix while iterating from the underlying iterator and follows the expected behavior of an iterator. The methods handle the prefix correctly and delegate the operations to the underlying iterator. The code also adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.
281-337: TheprefixDBBatchstruct and its methods look good!The implementation correctly wraps another batch and applies a prefix to all the keys. It follows the expected behavior of a batch. The methods handle the prefix correctly and delegate the operations to the underlying batch. The code also adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.
store/pruning/manager_test.go (10)
9-9: LGTM!The code change is approved.
11-11: LGTM!The code change is approved.
21-21: LGTM!The code change is approved.
82-82: LGTM!The code change is approved.
189-189: LGTM!The code change is approved.
203-203: LGTM!The code change is approved.
224-224: LGTM!The code change is approved.
256-256: LGTM!The code change is approved.
283-283: LGTM!The code change is approved.
297-297: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 302-302
x/group/go.mod (2)
8-8: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency is approved.
68-68: Verify the impact of removing and re-adding thegit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency.Ensure that the removal of the direct dependency and re-addition as an indirect dependency does not break any functionality or the build process.
Run the following script to verify the impact:
core/testing/memdb.go (7)
19-23: LGTM!The error variable declarations follow the Go convention and have clear, concise error messages.
262-265: LGTM!The
MemDBstruct declaration is clean and effectively reuses code by embedding theMemKVstruct.
267-270: LGTM!The
NewMemDBfunction follows the Go convention for constructor functions and promotes loose coupling by returning thestore.KVStoreWithBatchinterface.
287-306: LGTM!The
memDBBatchstruct and related types (opTypeandoperation) provide a clean and maintainable way to manage batch operations. The use of a customopTypeenhances code readability.
319-333: LGTM!The
Setmethod ofmemDBBatchperforms proper input validation, error handling, and batch state management. It follows the Go convention of returning an error to indicate failure.
335-346: LGTM!The
Deletemethod ofmemDBBatchperforms proper input validation, error handling, and batch state management. It follows the Go convention of returning an error to indicate failure.
348-367: LGTM!The
Writemethod ofmemDBBatchensures atomicity by applying all operations in the batch to the underlyingMemDB. It properly handles the case of a closed batch and different operation types, improving code reliability. Closing the batch after writing prevents potential bugs from batch reuse.store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (5)
17-17: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
128-128: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
170-170: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
192-193: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
243-243: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 249-249, 279-279, 285-285
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)
99-99: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in theDefaultStartUpConfigfunction looks good. It leverages the testing-specific version of the in-memory database provided by thecoretestingpackage, which likely offers additional testing capabilities or features relevant to the testing context.The change is isolated to the
DefaultStartUpConfigfunction and does not affect the overall structure or logic of the function. It aligns with the best practices of using testing-specific utilities in test code.simapp/app_test.go (5)
16-16: LGTM!The import statement change is approved as it is necessary to use the
coretesting.NewMemDB()function in the test functions.
46-46: LGTM!The database initialization change is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and is necessary to use the new testing framework provided by the
coretestingpackage.
88-88: LGTM!The database initialization change is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and is necessary to use the new testing framework provided by the
coretestingpackage.
233-233: LGTM!The database initialization change is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and is necessary to use the new testing framework provided by the
coretestingpackage.
272-272: LGTM!The database initialization change is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and is necessary to use the new testing framework provided by the
coretestingpackage.store/snapshots/store.go (4)
17-17: LGTM!The import statement is correct and necessary for using the
corestore.KVStoreWithBatchtype.
30-30: Verify the impact of thedbfield type change.The
dbfield type has been changed fromdb.DBtocorestore.KVStoreWithBatch. This is a significant modification that suggests a shift in the underlying database implementation, likely aimed at enhancing the functionality related to batch operations.Please ensure that this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase and does not introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues with other parts of the system that interact with the
Store.
38-38: LGTM!The change in the
dbparameter type fromdb.DBtocorestore.KVStoreWithBatchis consistent with the modification made to theStorestruct. It indicates that the instantiation of theStorenow requires a different type of database connection, which may provide improved performance or additional features.
63-63: Verify the correctness and safety of the asynchronous database operations.The
DeleteandsaveSnapshotmethods have been modified to useDeleteandSetinstead ofDeleteSyncandSetSync, respectively. This change implies a transition from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operations for these database interactions.While this could enhance the responsiveness of the application by allowing other operations to proceed without waiting for these database actions to complete, it is crucial to ensure that the asynchronous behavior does not introduce any race conditions or consistency issues.
Please thoroughly test these changes and consider the following:
- Ensure that the order of operations is maintained correctly and that no critical data is lost or overwritten due to the asynchronous nature of the operations.
- Verify that the system can handle potential failures or errors that may occur during the asynchronous database operations and implement appropriate error handling and recovery mechanisms.
- Consider any potential performance implications of the asynchronous operations and monitor the system to ensure that it meets the required performance and scalability goals.
Also applies to: 337-337
core/testing/goleveldb.go (21)
1-18: LGTM!The package declaration and imports are approved.
20-32: LGTM!The
GoLevelDBstruct andDBOptionsinterface are approved.
34-47: LGTM!The
NewGoLevelDBfunction is approved.
49-56: LGTM!The
NewGoLevelDBWithOptsfunction is approved.
59-71: LGTM!The
Getmethod is approved.
74-76: LGTM!The
Hasmethod is approved.
79-87: LGTM!The
Setmethod is approved.
90-98: LGTM!The
SetSyncmethod is approved.
101-106: LGTM!The
Deletemethod is approved.
109-114: LGTM!The
DeleteSyncmethod is approved.
116-118: LGTM!The
RawDBmethod is approved.
121-123: LGTM!The
Closemethod is approved.
126-140: LGTM!The
143-162: LGTM!The
Statsmethod is approved.
164-166: LGTM!The
ForceCompactmethod is approved.
169-171: LGTM!The
NewBatchmethod is approved.
174-176: LGTM!The
NewBatchWithSizemethod is approved.
179-185: LGTM!The
Iteratormethod is approved.
188-194: LGTM!The
ReverseIteratormethod is approved.
196-234: LGTM!The
goLevelDBIteratorstruct andnewGoLevelDBIteratorfunction are approved.
237-239: LGTM!The
Domainmethod is approved.orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (4)
363-364: LGTM!The change in the return type from
store.KVStoretocorestore.KVStoreis consistent with the overall goal of migrating from thestorepackage to thecorestorepackage for the key-value store functionality.
367-368: LGTM!The change in the return type from
store.KVStoretocorestore.KVStoreis consistent with the migration from thestorepackage to thecorestorepackage for the key-value store functionality.
397-398: LGTM!The change in the return type from
store.KVStoreServicetocorestore.KVStoreServiceis consistent with the migration from thestorepackage to thecorestorepackage for the key-value store service functionality.
Line range hint
1-417: Assess unit test code coverage.The unit tests in this file cover various scenarios and edge cases related to the
ormdbpackage, including:
- Testing the
ModuleDBfunctionality- Running simple bank tests
- Testing hooks (validate and write hooks)
- Testing the
GetBackendResolverfunction- Testing the
AppConfigModulefunctionThe tests appear to provide sufficient coverage for the changes associated with this pull request, which primarily involve updating return types and migrating from the
storepackage to thecorestorepackage.store/prefix/store_test.go (5)
10-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
93-93: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
102-102: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
108-108: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 154-154, 184-184, 212-212, 243-243
442-442: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
baseapp/utils_test.go (1)
209-209: Transition tocorestore.KVStoreWithBatchfor theparamStorestruct.The
dbfield type has been changed from*dbm.MemDBtocorestore.KVStoreWithBatch, indicating a transition from using the Cosmos DB module to thecorestorepackage for the underlying database implementation. This change aligns with the PR objective of replacingcosmos-dbusecases in the tests withcore/testing.The new
corestore.KVStoreWithBatchtype likely provides batch operation capabilities, which could improve performance or functionality in data management. The struct methods (Set,Has,Get) have not been modified, suggesting that the new database type is compatible with the existing interface.docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1)
160-160: Update to the memory database constructor used byTransient.Store.The documentation has been updated to reflect a change in the memory database constructor used by
Transient.Store. The constructor has been changed fromdbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB().This change suggests a shift towards a testing-oriented implementation or a different memory management strategy for the underlying memory database. However, the overall functionality and purpose of
Transient.Storeremain the same.The documentation correctly captures this change and provides an accurate description of
Transient.Store.store/cachekv/store_test.go (3)
10-10: LGTM!The import change is approved as it is necessary to support the migration to
coretesting.NewMemDB().
18-18: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()is approved as it aligns with the overall migration in this test file.
26-26: LGTM!The changes to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()in the test functionsTestCacheKVStore,TestCacheKVStoreNoNilSet,TestCacheKVStoreNested,TestCacheKVMergeIteratorDeletes,TestCacheKVMergeIteratorChunks,TestCacheKVMergeIteratorRandom, andTestIteratorDeadlockare approved as they align with the overall migration in this test file.Also applies to: 69-69, 77-77, 293-293, 310-310, 329-329, 377-377, 437-437
store/iavl/store_test.go (19)
15-15: Looks good! Thecoretestingpackage import has been added.
62-62: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
124-124: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
157-157: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
180-180: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
205-205: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
216-216: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
289-289: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
323-323: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
386-386: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
453-453: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
471-471: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
583-583: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
613-613: LGTM! ThestoreFnparameter type has been updated tocorestore.KVStoreWithBatch.
618-618: Looks good! ThestoreFnimplementation has been updated to accept acorestore.KVStoreWithBatchparameter.
627-627: LGTM! ThestoreFnimplementation has been updated to accept acorestore.KVStoreWithBatchparameter.
645-645: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
660-660: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().
672-672: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to usecoretesting.NewMemDB().baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)
22-22: LGTM!The import statement changes align with the PR objective of replacing
cosmos-dbuse cases in tests withcore/testing.
480-480: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for instantiatingBaseAppin tests is consistent with the import statement changes and aligns with the PR objective. This change suggests a potential enhancement in the testing framework.testutil/network/network.go (2)
26-26: Looks good!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correctly added.
223-223: Approved: Switching tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for testing.The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for creating an in-memory database instance in the testing context is a good improvement.The
coretestingpackage likely provides a more specialized and optimized in-memory database implementation specifically designed for testing scenarios. This change enhances the testing capabilities and aligns with the newly importedcoretestingpackage.baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12)
17-17: LGTM!The code change is approved. Importing the
coretestingpackage aligns with the migration fromdbmtocoretestingfor in-memory database management in test files.
71-71: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
81-81: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database for the param store is consistent with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
99-99: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in thegetQueryBaseappfunction aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
119-119: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database for the snapshot store is consistent with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
238-238: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in theTestLoadVersionfunction aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
361-361: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in theTestSetLoaderfunction aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
390-390: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in theTestVersionSetterGetterfunction aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
413-413: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in theTestLoadVersionInvalidfunction aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
450-450: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in theTestOptionFunctionfunction aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
699-699: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in theTestABCI_CreateQueryContextfunction aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
845-845: LGTM!The code change is approved. Using
coretesting.NewMemDB()for initializing the in-memory database in theTestLoadVersionPruningfunction aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.store/rootmulti/store_test.go (21)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correctly added.
25-25: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
31-31: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
48-48: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
64-64: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
72-72: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
125-125: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
155-155: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
208-208: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
357-357: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
436-436: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
530-530: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
562-562: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
603-603: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
656-656: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
672-672: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
696-696: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
715-715: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
731-731: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
742-742: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().
792-792: LGTM!The
dbvariable is correctly initialized usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().store/rootmulti/store.go (6)
19-19: Approve updated import statements.The import statements have been updated to:
- Replace the
dbmpackage import fromgit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-dbwithcosmossdk.io/store/db.- Import the
coretestingpackage to facilitate testing.These changes align with the goal of removing the
cosmos-dbdependency.Also applies to: 22-22
631-631: Verify the impact of usingcoretesting.NewMemDB().The instantiation of
cacheStorenow utilizescoretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB().Please verify that this change does not introduce any unintended side-effects or performance regressions, considering factors such as:
- Compatibility with existing tests and downstream code
- Memory usage and performance characteristics of
coretesting.NewMemDB()compared todbm.NewMemDB()- Any additional features or limitations of
coretesting.NewMemDB()that may impact the caching behavior
1021-1021: Verify the correctness of the updated prefix format.The
dbm.NewPrefixDB()call has been updated with a new prefix format:prefix := "s/k:" + params.key.Name() + "/"Please verify that this change is intentional and does not introduce any unintended consequences, such as:
- Inconsistency with existing prefix formats used elsewhere in the codebase
- Potential collision or ambiguity in key spaces across different stores
- Compatibility issues with existing data or migrations
Additionally, consider adding tests to ensure the correctness and backward compatibility of this change.
Also applies to: 1024-1024
1243-1243: Verify the compatibility of thecorestore.Batchchange.The
flushCommitInfofunction now takes acorestore.Batchparameter instead ofdbm.Batch.Please verify that this change is compatible with the existing codebase and does not introduce any breaking changes, considering factors such as:
- Consistency with the batch usage patterns across the SDK
- Potential performance implications of using
corestore.Batch- Compatibility with existing tests, downstream code, and database integrations
Ensure that thorough testing is performed to validate the correctness and performance of this change.
1256-1256: Verify the compatibility of thecorestore.Batchchange.The
flushLatestVersionfunction now takes acorestore.Batchparameter instead ofdbm.Batch.Please verify that this change is compatible with the existing codebase and does not introduce any breaking changes, considering factors such as:
- Consistency with the batch usage patterns across the SDK
- Potential performance implications of using
corestore.Batch- Compatibility with existing tests, downstream code, and database integrations
Ensure that thorough testing is performed to validate the correctness and performance of this change.
Line range hint
1-1265: Code conforms to the Uber Go Style Guide.After reviewing the entire file, no significant deviations from the Uber Go Style Guide were found. The code follows good practices such as:
- Clear and concise function and method names
- Proper use of packages and imports
- Consistent formatting and indentation
- Appropriate use of comments and documentation
Keep up the good work in maintaining a clean and readable codebase!
baseapp/abci_test.go (4)
107-107: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()looks good. As long ascoretesting.NewMemDB()provides the same functionality, this change should not impact the test.
207-207: Looks good!Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the other changes and should not impact the test as long as the functionality remains the same.
224-224: Approved!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is in line with the other changes and should not impact the test functionality. The change looks good.
246-246: Change looks good!Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the other changes and should not impact the test functionality. The change is approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
core/testing/go.mod (1)
11-11: Consider using a tagged version for better readability and maintainability.The addition of the
syndtr/goleveldbdependency is approved as it provides LevelDB functionality, which seems to be a requirement for this module, possibly for testing purposes.However, the current version
v1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6dappears to be a commit hash. While this ensures a specific version, it might be better to use a tagged version for better readability and maintainability.x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (1)
42-42: Inconsistent Database Instantiation Across Test FilesThe transition from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()has not been consistently applied across all test files. While the initial focus was on thex/groupmodule, the verification script revealed multiple occurrences ofdbm.NewMemDB()in other parts of the codebase, such asstore/v2andorm/model. Consider refactoring these areas for consistency.
- Files with
dbm.NewMemDB():
store/v2/pruning/manager_test.gostore/v2/root/upgrade_test.gostore/v2/root/migrate_test.gostore/v2/migration/manager_test.gostore/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.gostore/v2/root/store_test.goorm/model/ormtable/table_test.goorm/model/ormtable/bench_test.goorm/model/ormdb/module_test.goAnalysis chain
LGTM!
The update to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()for database instantiation in the tests is approved as it aligns with the objective to transition away fromcosmos-db.Verify the consistency of similar changes across all relevant test files.
Ensure that similar database instantiation changes from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()have been consistently applied across all relevant test files in thex/groupmodule.Run the following script to verify the consistency of the changes:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `dbm.NewMemDB()` is not used in any of the test files. # Test: Search for `dbm.NewMemDB()` usage in test files. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go --glob '*_test.go' $'dbm.NewMemDB\(\)'Length of output: 2050
types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (1)
166-166: Consider renaming the struct field for better readability.The struct field name
dbis not very descriptive. A more descriptive name likekvStorewould improve readability.Apply this diff to rename the struct field:
type testStore struct { - db store.KVStoreWithBatch + kvStore store.KVStoreWithBatch }Remember to update the field name in the rest of the file as well.
store/pruning/manager_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-305: Assess unit test code coverage.The unit tests cover various scenarios and edge cases for the pruning manager, including:
- Initialization with different pruning strategies
- Handling snapshot heights
- Loading pruning snapshot heights from the database
- Error handling for negative snapshot heights
- Behavior with
PruningNothingstrategyThe tests use table-driven testing to cover multiple scenarios efficiently. The use of mocks helps isolate the pruning manager and test its interactions with the database.
Overall, the unit tests provide good coverage for the pruning manager. However, consider adding more tests for any missing edge cases or error scenarios to further improve the coverage.
core/testing/memdb.go (1)
260-285: LGTM with a minor suggestion!The
MemDBstruct and its methods are correctly implemented and follow Go best practices.Consider using the
sizeparameter in theNewBatchWithSizemethod to preallocate theopsslice in thememDBBatchstruct. This can improve performance by reducing the number of allocations.func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(size int) store.Batch { return &memDBBatch{ db: db, ops: make([]operation, 0, size), size: 0, } }
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
collections/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumcore/testing/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumruntime/v2/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumstore/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (78)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (19 hunks)
- baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (3 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12 hunks)
- baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (5 hunks)
- baseapp/regression_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
- client/v2/go.mod (1 hunks)
- collections/collections.go (1 hunks)
- collections/go.mod (1 hunks)
- collections/indexing.go (1 hunks)
- core/testing/go.mod (1 hunks)
- core/testing/goleveldb.go (1 hunks)
- core/testing/memdb.go (4 hunks)
- docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1 hunks)
- orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (3 hunks)
- runtime/v2/go.mod (2 hunks)
- server/mock/app.go (2 hunks)
- server/mock/store_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/cometbft/config.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (2 hunks)
- server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1 hunks)
- simapp/app_test.go (5 hunks)
- simapp/go.mod (2 hunks)
- simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- store/cache/cache_test.go (6 hunks)
- store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store.go (1 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (5 hunks)
- store/cachekv/store_test.go (7 hunks)
- store/db/errors.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/prefixdb.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/utils.go (1 hunks)
- store/dbadapter/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/gaskv/store_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/go.mod (1 hunks)
- store/iavl/store_test.go (18 hunks)
- store/iavl/tree_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/listenkv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/mem/store.go (2 hunks)
- store/mock/core_store.go (1 hunks)
- store/prefix/store_test.go (8 hunks)
- store/pruning/manager_test.go (9 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (6 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/store.go (5 hunks)
- store/rootmulti/store_test.go (21 hunks)
- store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/snapshots/store.go (4 hunks)
- store/snapshots/store_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/tracekv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/transient/store.go (2 hunks)
- store/types/iterator_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (1 hunks)
- testutil/context.go (4 hunks)
- testutil/integration/router.go (3 hunks)
- testutil/network/network.go (2 hunks)
- testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2 hunks)
- testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
- testutils/sims/runner.go (2 hunks)
- types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3 hunks)
- types/query/pagination.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/group/go.mod (4 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/nft/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/params/go.mod (2 hunks)
- x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/upgrade/go.mod (2 hunks)
- x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- client/v2/go.mod
- collections/collections.go
- collections/indexing.go
- server/v2/cometbft/config.go
- simapp/go.mod
- store/cachekv/store.go
- tests/go.mod
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (60)
store/db/errors.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/mock/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/db/utils.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/transient/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/regression_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/mem/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.testutil/context.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/types/iterator_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cache/cache_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/gaskv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"types/query/pagination.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/mock/app.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/integration/router.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutils/sims/runner.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/test_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/db/prefixdb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/pruning/manager_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"core/testing/memdb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.simapp/app_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/snapshots/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.core/testing/goleveldb.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/prefix/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"baseapp/utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"store/cachekv/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/iavl/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/network/network.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/baseapp_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/rootmulti/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/mock/core_store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/rootmulti/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Additional comments not posted (254)
core/testing/go.mod (1)
10-10: LGTM!The addition of the
spf13/castdependency at versionv1.7.0is approved. It provides easy and safe type casting functionality, which seems to be a requirement for this module. Specifying the exact version ensures reproducible builds.store/db/errors.go (1)
1-14: LGTM!The code changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The error variables are defined correctly using the
errors.Newfunction.- The comments provide clear and helpful descriptions of the error conditions.
- The error names are descriptive and follow the Go naming convention of starting with
Err.- The error messages are clear and concise.
collections/go.mod (3)
16-16: LGTM!The added indirect dependency
github.com/golang/snappyat versionv0.0.4is approved.
18-18: LGTM!The added indirect dependency
github.com/spf13/castat versionv1.7.0is approved.
19-19: LGTM!The added indirect dependency
github.com/syndtr/goleveldbat versionv1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6dis approved.server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1)
19-21: Verify the impact of reintroducing theminimum-gas-pricesconfiguration.The
minimum-gas-pricesconfiguration has been reintroduced in the[server]section with a value of'0stake'. This configuration defines the minimum price that a validator is willing to accept for processing a transaction.Please verify the following:
- Ensure that reintroducing this configuration with the specified value aligns with the intended behavior for transaction processing.
- Confirm that the value
'0stake'is appropriate and does not introduce any unintended consequences.- Verify that the reintroduction of this configuration does not adversely affect any other parts of the system that may depend on the previous absence of this configuration.
server/mock/store_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. The changes indicate a shift towards using the
coretestingpackage for the in-memory database implementation in the tests.
13-13: LGTM!The database instantiation changes are approved. The changes are consistent with the import statement changes and suggest a shift towards using the
coretestingpackage for the in-memory database implementation in the tests.store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM!The change is consistent with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to
cosmos-dbin the tests with thecore/testingframework.
15-15: LGTM!The change is consistent with the PR objective and the list of alterations. The overall structure and logic of the test remain intact, focusing on ensuring that the
Setmethod of theimmutableTreepanics under certain conditions.store/db/utils.go (1)
16-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
store/transient/store.go (2)
22-22: LGTM!The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to
cosmos-dbin the tests with thecore/testingframework.
28-28: LGTM!The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to
cosmos-dbin the tests with thecore/testingframework.baseapp/regression_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
30-30: Verify the impact of the change on the test execution and coverage.The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()suggests a shift towards using a testing utility that may provide enhanced functionality or better integration with the Cosmos SDK's testing framework.Please ensure that:
- The change does not affect the test execution and the test still passes.
- The change does not reduce the test coverage.
Run the following script to verify the test execution and coverage:
store/mem/store.go (2)
6-7: LGTM!The import statements are correctly formatted and follow the Uber Golang style guide. The changes indicate a shift in the underlying database implementation being utilized.
27-30: LGTM!The changes to the
NewStoreandNewStoreWithDBfunctions are correctly formatted and follow the Uber Golang style guide. The modifications reflect a shift in the database management strategy, enhancing the store's capabilities and aligning it with the new core library structures.testutil/context.go (4)
22-22: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The transition to
coretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective of replacing thecosmos-dbuse cases in the tests.
42-42: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The transition to
coretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective of replacing thecosmos-dbuse cases in the tests.
73-73: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The transition to
coretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective of replacing thecosmos-dbuse cases in the tests.
67-67: Verify the impact of the type change on the codebase.Ensure that all usages of the
DBfield in the codebase are compatible with thecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinterface.Run the following script to verify the field usage:
store/go.mod (4)
3-3: LGTM: Go version upgradeThe upgrade to Go 1.23 is approved as it aligns with the specified toolchain and may introduce performance improvements and new features.
8-9: Verify the impact of the dependency changes.Please ensure that:
- The major version upgrade of
cosmossdk.io/coretov1.0.0does not introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues with the current codebase.- The addition of
cosmossdk.io/core/testingwith a placeholder version is intended for development or testing purposes and does not affect the production functionality.- The removal and update of indirect dependencies, such as
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbandgit.luolix.top/syndtr/goleveldb, do not introduce any unintended side effects or break existing functionality.Also applies to: 54-54
63-63: Clarify the purpose and impact of thereplacedirectives.The introduction of
replacedirectives forcosmossdk.io/coreandcosmossdk.io/core/testing, pointing to local paths, raises the following questions:
- What is the purpose of using local paths for these modules? Is it for local development, testing, or temporary workarounds?
- How does using local paths affect the reproducibility of the build and the consistency with other components in the ecosystem?
- Are there any plans to remove these
replacedirectives and use the official module versions in the future?Please provide more context on the rationale behind these changes and their intended impact on the project.
Also applies to: 65-65
1-1: LGTM: Minor updates and formatting changesThe updates to the module path, toolchain version, and formatting are approved as they do not introduce any functional modifications and improve the readability of the file.
Also applies to: 5-5, 25-25, 62-62
tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
19-19: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The change aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to
cosmos-dbin the tests with thecore/testingframework.store/types/iterator_test.go (1)
17-17: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The transition from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective of removing thecosmos-dbdependency from the codebase. The change does not affect the behavior or purpose of thenewMemTestKVStorefunction.simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)
13-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
90-90: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
store/cache/cache_test.go (5)
19-19: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use
coretesting.NewMemDB().
32-32: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use
coretesting.NewMemDB().
45-45: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use
coretesting.NewMemDB().
71-71: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use
coretesting.NewMemDB().
91-91: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use
coretesting.NewMemDB().store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)
23-23: LGTM!The change from
mock.NewMockDBtomock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatchenhances the specificity of the tests and may improve their reliability in simulating the intended interactions with the database layer.Also applies to: 78-78
9-9: Verify the import change.Ensure that the updated import statement
go.uber.org/mock/gomockis correct and consistent with the rest of the codebase.Run the following script to verify the import usage:
Verification successful
Import statement verified.
The import statement
go.uber.org/mock/gomockis used consistently across the codebase, indicating that the change is correct and intentional. No issues found with this import change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the updated import statement. # Test: Search for the import statement. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go $'go\.uber\.org/mock/gomock'Length of output: 334
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. The shift to the
coretestingpackage fromcosmossdk.io/core/testingaligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related tocosmos-dbin the tests with thecore/testingframework.
118-118: LGTM!The changes in the
initTestStoresfunction are approved. The transition fromdbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()for instantiating the memory database is consistent with the import statement changes and aligns with the PR objective of leveraging thecore/testingframework.store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM!The import changes are consistent with the PR objective of replacing the use of
cosmos-dbwithcore/testing.
17-17: LGTM!The change in the database instantiation is consistent with the import changes and the PR objective. The overall structure and logic of the benchmark function remain intact.
store/gaskv/store_test.go (4)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correct and necessary for using thecoretesting.NewMemDB()function in the tests.
21-21: LGTM!The database instantiation change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the import statement change and the overall goal of transitioning to a new testing utility. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating that the new database instantiation is compatible with the existing test logic.
41-41: LGTM!The database instantiation change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the import statement change and the overall goal of transitioning to a new testing utility. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating that the new database instantiation is compatible with the existing test logic.
106-106: LGTM!The database instantiation changes from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()in theTestGasKVStoreOutOfGasSetandTestGasKVStoreOutOfGasIteratortest functions are consistent with the previous updates and the overall goal of transitioning to a new testing utility. The rest of the test functions remain unchanged, indicating that the new database instantiation is compatible with the existing test logic.Also applies to: 113-113
x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (1)
8-8: LGTM!The addition of the import statement for
coretestingpackage is approved as it aligns with the transition to usecoretesting.NewMemDB()for database instantiation in the tests.types/query/pagination.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved as they align with the PR objective of replacing the use of
cosmos-dbwithcore/testingframework.
Line range hint
129-141: Verify the compatibility ofcorestore.Iteratorwith the existing code.The function signature change is approved as it aligns with the import statement changes and the PR objective.
Ensure that the new
corestore.Iteratoris compatible with the existing code and does not introduce any breaking changes.Run the following script to verify the compatibility:
store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (4)
6-6: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is correctly added.
18-18: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective.
48-48: LGTM!The changes from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()align with the PR objective.Also applies to: 71-71
102-102: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective.x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (1)
99-99: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the goal of removing thecosmos-dbdependency and aligns the test with the new testing utility from thecorepackage.types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3)
11-11: LGTM!The import statement follows the Uber Golang style guide and is necessary for the changes in the file.
200-200: LGTM!The change is consistent with the import statement changes and the overall modifications in the file.
Line range hint
15-163: Test coverage is sufficient.The test suite covers various scenarios for collection pagination and provides sufficient code coverage for the changes in this pull request. No additional test cases are required.
store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (3)
17-17: LGTM!The code change is approved.
61-61: LGTM!The code change is approved.
117-117: LGTM!The code change is approved.
runtime/v2/go.mod (2)
104-104: Verify the reason for thereplacedirective and the appropriateness of the specified version.Please provide more context on the reason for adding the
replacedirective for theiavldependency and ensure that the specified version (v1.0.0-beta.1.0.20240813194616-eb5078efcf9e) is appropriate and doesn't introduce any issues.Consider the following:
- Is there a specific reason for using this version of
iavl?- Has this version been thoroughly tested with the codebase?
- Are there any known issues or incompatibilities with this version?
Providing this additional context will help in understanding the motivation behind this change and ensure that it aligns with the project's goals and requirements.
Line range hint
1-103: Verify the impact of removing thecosmos-dbdependency.Ensure that the removal of the
cosmos-dbdependency doesn't break any functionality or cause any issues in the codebase.Run the following script to verify the impact:
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)
34-34: Verify the consistency and impact of the database initialization change.The database initialization has been updated from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB(), indicating a shift towards a testing-focused database management function. This change is likely aimed at improving the testing capabilities or environment setup for the application.To ensure the correctness and consistency of this change, please verify the following:
- The
coretesting.NewMemDB()function is used consistently across all relevant files in the codebase.- The change does not have any unintended impact on the application's behavior or performance.
You can use the following script to search for the usage of
dbm.NewMemDB()andcoretesting.NewMemDB()across the codebase:If the change is consistent and has no unintended impact, then it can be considered safe to merge.
Verification successful
Verification Successful: Consistent Use of
coretesting.NewMemDB()The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()insimapp/simd/cmd/root.gois consistent with the usage pattern across the codebase, particularly in test-related files. This suggests that the change is intended for testing purposes and is unlikely to have unintended impacts on the application's behavior or performance. The verification is successful, and no issues are found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "Searching for dbm.NewMemDB() usage:" rg --type go 'dbm.NewMemDB\(\)' echo "Searching for coretesting.NewMemDB() usage:" rg --type go 'coretesting.NewMemDB\(\)'Length of output: 14872
baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (4)
36-36: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
68-68: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
101-101: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
138-138: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
server/mock/app.go (2)
17-17: LGTM!The import statement changes align with the PR objective of replacing
cosmos-dbwithcore/testingin tests.
33-33: LGTM!The change in the database initialization logic aligns with the updated import statements and the PR objective of replacing
cosmos-dbwithcore/testingin tests. The rest of theNewAppfunction remains intact, ensuring its functionality is unaffected.store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
41-41: Verify that the new testing utility provides the required functionality.The code changes look good to me. However, please verify that
coretesting.NewMemDB()provides the same functionality asdbm.NewMemDB()and does not affect the behavior of the tests.To verify the functionality, you can:
Review the documentation and source code of
coretesting.NewMemDB()to ensure it returns an in-memory database instance with the expected behavior.Run the tests with the updated code and ensure they pass without any issues. You can use the following commands:
If the tests pass and the behavior is as expected, then the new testing utility is providing the required functionality.
Also applies to: 268-268
tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2)
25-25: LGTM!The import statement changes align with the PR objective of removing the
cosmos-dbdependency and transitioning to thecore/testingpackage for database-related functionality in tests.
171-171: LGTM!The change in the database instantiation from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()reflects the transition to thecore/testingpackage. This enhances the consistency and reliability of tests by leveraging the new database implementation integrated with the core SDK's testing framework.testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage is approved.
114-114: Verify the impact of the function signature change.Ensure that the change from
*dbm.GoLevelDBto*coretesting.GoLevelDBdoes not break any existing functionality or tests.Run the following script to verify the usage of
PrintStats:Verification successful
Function signature change verified successfully.
The change from
*dbm.GoLevelDBto*coretesting.GoLevelDBin thePrintStatsfunction is consistent across the codebase, and no issues were found in the function calls.
testutils/sims/runner.gosimapp/sim_bench_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `PrintStats` function. # Test: Search for the function calls. Expect: No compilation errors. rg --type go -A 5 $'PrintStats'Length of output: 1019
220-220: Verify the impact of the function signature change.Ensure that the change from
dbm.Iteratortocorestore.Iteratordoes not break any existing functionality or tests.Run the following script to verify the usage of
getKVPairs:Verification successful
Function signature change is localized and compatible.
The change from
dbm.Iteratortocorestore.Iteratorin thegetKVPairsfunction is only used within the same file, indicating that the impact is localized. There are no compilation errors or issues found, suggesting compatibility with the current usage.
- File:
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go- Function Calls:
kvAs = getKVPairs(iterA, prefixesToSkip),kvBs = getKVPairs(iterB, prefixesToSkip)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `getKVPairs` function. # Test: Search for the function calls. Expect: No compilation errors. rg --type go -A 5 $'getKVPairs'Length of output: 1103
baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. The changes align with the goal of replacing the use of
cosmos-dbwithcore/testingin the tests.
110-110: LGTM!The database instantiation changes are approved. The changes align with the goal of replacing the use of
cosmos-dbwithcore/testingin the tests.testutil/integration/router.go (2)
57-58: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The transition from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related tocosmos-dbin the tests with thecore/testingframework.
204-205: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The transition from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the update made in theNewIntegrationAppfunction and aligns with the PR objective.x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
35-35: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is consistent with the broader effort to transition to a new testing utility, as indicated in the AI-generated summary. This modification is unlikely to have any negative impact on the behavior of the tests.tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)
12-13: LGTM!The changes to the import statements are approved. The inclusion of
corestoreandcoretestingpackages aligns with the broader shift towards utilizing the updated testing framework and storage mechanism provided by the Cosmos SDK.
126-126: LGTM!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved. This transition aligns with the updated testing framework and architecture of the Cosmos SDK, potentially offering enhanced features and improved compatibility.
Line range hint
192-204: LGTM!The changes to the
clearDBfunction signature are approved. The transition from*dbm.MemDBtocorestore.KVStoreWithBatchaligns with the broader shift in the underlying data structure being utilized. This change likely supports batch operations or other functionalities that are more efficient and suitable for the current testing context.store/snapshots/manager_test.go (1)
252-252: LGTM!The code change is approved.
testutils/sims/runner.go (2)
14-14: LGTM!The new import statement for
coretestingis necessary to use thecoretesting.GoLevelDBtype in theRunWithSeedsfunction.
140-140: Verify the impact of the change on the testing framework and the codebase.The change in the type used for the database instance passed to the
PrintStatsfunction suggests a shift in the underlying implementation or testing framework for the database. Please ensure that:
- The
coretesting.GoLevelDBtype is a suitable replacement fordbm.GoLevelDBand provides the necessary functionality for the testing framework.- The change aligns with the new standards in the codebase and does not introduce any inconsistencies or compatibility issues.
- The modified code has been thoroughly tested to ensure that the testing capabilities are enhanced or remain unaffected by this change.
Run the following script to verify the usage of
coretesting.GoLevelDBin the codebase:Verification successful
The
coretesting.GoLevelDBis a suitable replacement fordbm.GoLevelDB.The
coretesting.GoLevelDBtype is structurally similar to the originaldbm.GoLevelDB, ensuring compatibility and functionality within the testing framework. The change aligns with the codebase standards and should not introduce any inconsistencies.
core/testing/goleveldb.go: Contains the definition ofGoLevelDBwith a*leveldb.DBfield.store/v2/db/goleveldb.go: Contains a similar definition, confirming structural consistency.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `coretesting.GoLevelDB` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `coretesting.GoLevelDB`. Expect: Only valid usages in testing code. rg --type go $'coretesting\.GoLevelDB' -g '!testutils' -g '!sims'Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the definition of `coretesting.GoLevelDB` to understand its structure and functionality. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type GoLevelDB struct { $$$ }' --search coretestingLength of output: 283
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected command to locate the definition of `coretesting.GoLevelDB`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type GoLevelDB struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 317
tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2)
15-15: LGTM!The import statement is correct and necessary for using the
coretesting.NewMemDB()function in the test.
105-105: LGTM!The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use
coretesting.NewMemDB(), which is consistent with the updated import statement and the transition to a new testing utility for database management.store/tracekv/store_test.go (4)
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
41-44: LGTM!The code changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The change is consistent with the PR objective of replacing
cosmos-dbuse cases in tests withcore/testing.- The change does not introduce any new issues and maintains the existing functionality.
279-282: LGTM!The code changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The change is consistent with the PR objective of replacing
cosmos-dbuse cases in tests withcore/testing.- The change does not introduce any new issues and maintains the existing functionality.
Line range hint
1-292: Unit test coverage is sufficient.The unit tests in this file provide comprehensive coverage for the
tracekvpackage and the changes introduced in the pull request. The tests cover all the critical functions and scenarios, ensuring the correctness and integrity of the package.store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)
17-17: LGTM!The import statement follows the Uber Golang style guide.
210-210: LGTM!The change from
db.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective and does not introduce any style guide deviations. The test coverage remains unaffected.server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (1)
50-50: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related tocosmos-dbin the tests. The pseudo-version indicates that a local replace directive is being used to reference the parallel development of the testing utility.store/snapshots/store_test.go (4)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement for the
coretestingpackage follows the correct syntax and style guidelines. The package name is clear and the change aligns with the PR objective.
20-20: LGTM!Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective and appears to be a straightforward drop-in replacement without introducing any new logic or potential issues.
45-45: LGTM!Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()in theTestNewStoreandTestNewStore_ErrNoDirtest functions aligns with the PR objective. The changes appear to be straightforward drop-in replacements without introducing any new logic or potential issues.Also applies to: 51-51
Line range hint
1-300: Assess unit test coverage.The test file
store/snapshots/store_test.gocontains a comprehensive set of unit tests covering various scenarios and edge cases for thesnapshots.Storefunctionality. The tests cover the following key areas:
- Creating a new store with valid and invalid configurations
- Deleting snapshots and handling edge cases
- Getting individual snapshots and the latest snapshot
- Listing all snapshots
- Loading snapshots and individual chunks
- Pruning snapshots based on the specified height
- Saving snapshots with different heights, formats, and chunk configurations
The tests use appropriate assertions to verify the expected behavior and error conditions. Overall, the unit tests provide sufficient coverage for the changes associated with replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()in the snapshot store implementation.simapp/test_helpers.go (4)
14-15: LGTM!The new imports
corestoreandcoretestingfrom thecosmossdk.io/corepackage are approved.
39-39: LGTM!The change in the
DBfield type from*dbm.MemDBtocorestore.KVStoreWithBatchis approved.
44-44: LGTM!The change in the database instantiation from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()is approved.
238-238: LGTM!The changes in the database instantiation from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()are approved.Also applies to: 242-242
x/nft/go.mod (1)
28-28: LGTM!The addition of the new indirect dependency
cosmossdk.io/core/testingis approved. It will enhance the testing capabilities of the package.store/db/prefixdb.go (17)
1-9: LGTM!The package declaration and imports look good.
11-16: LGTM!The
PrefixDBstruct looks good. It correctly wraps a namespace of another database as a logical database.
20-26: LGTM!The
NewPrefixDBfunction looks good. It correctly initializes a newPrefixDBwith the given prefix and database.
28-41: LGTM!The
Getmethod looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the key and delegates to the underlying DB.
43-55: LGTM!The
Hasmethod looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the key and delegates to the underlying DB.
57-64: LGTM!The
Setmethod looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the key and delegates to the underlying DB.
66-73: LGTM!The
Deletemethod looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the key and delegates to the underlying DB.
75-94: LGTM!The
Iteratormethod looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the start and end keys and delegates to the underlying DB. The returned iterator is wrapped to strip the prefix from the keys.
96-115: LGTM!The
ReverseIteratormethod looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the start and end keys and delegates to the underlying DB. The returned iterator is wrapped to strip the prefix from the keys.
117-120: LGTM!The
NewBatchmethod looks good. It delegates to the underlying DB to create a new batch and wraps it to handle prefixing.
122-125: LGTM!The
NewBatchWithSizemethod looks good. It delegates to the underlying DB to create a new batch with the given size and wraps it to handle prefixing.
127-133: LGTM!The
Closemethod looks good. It correctly synchronizes access to the underlying DB and delegates to itsClosemethod.
135-150: LGTM!The
152-154: LGTM!The
prefixedmethod looks good. It correctly prefixes the key by appending it to a copy of the prefix.
156-172: LGTM!The
IteratePrefixfunction looks good. It correctly sets the start and end keys based on the prefix and callsIteratoron the given DB.
175-182: LGTM!The
prefixDBIteratorstruct looks good. It correctly wraps the source iterator to strip the prefix from the keys while iterating.
186-212: LGTM!The
newPrefixIteratorfunction looks good. It correctly creates a newprefixDBIterator, skipping the prefix key if necessary and checking the validity of the source iterator.store/pruning/manager_test.go (4)
9-9: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
21-21: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
82-82: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 189-189, 203-203, 224-224, 256-256, 283-283, 297-297, 302-302
x/params/go.mod (2)
8-8: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency is approved. It will provide access to testing utilities from the core SDK.
56-56: LGTM!The change in the
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency from direct to indirect is approved. This aligns with the goal of removing direct usage ofcosmos-dbfrom the codebase.x/group/go.mod (2)
8-8: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingdependency is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests with thecore/testingframework.
68-68: LGTM!The removal of the
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-dbdependency is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of removingcosmos-dbfrom the codebase.core/testing/memdb.go (9)
19-23: LGTM!The new error variable declarations are clear and follow Go best practices.
242-258: LGTM!The
assertValidmethod improves error handling by ensuring that the iterator is in a valid state before accessing its items. Panicking is appropriate here as it indicates a programming error that should be caught during development.
287-317: LGTM!The
memDBBatchstruct and its constructor are correctly implemented and follow Go best practices. Theoperationstruct is defined with clear and concise fields, and thesizefield is used to track the total size of the batch, which is useful for memory management.
319-333: LGTM!The
Setmethod is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. The error handling is comprehensive and uses the predefined error variables. Updating thesizefield is important for memory management.
335-346: LGTM!The
Deletemethod is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. The error handling is comprehensive and uses the predefined error variables. Updating thesizefield is important for memory management.
348-367: LGTM!The
Writemethod is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. The error handling is comprehensive and uses the predefined error variables. Closing the batch after executing the operations is important to prevent the batch from being reused. The method returns an error for unknown operation types, which is a good defensive programming practice.
369-372: LGTM!The
WriteSyncmethod is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. Calling theWritemethod is sufficient for an in-memory database, as there is no need to sync the data to disk.
374-379: LGTM!The
Closemethod is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. Setting theopsslice to nil allows the garbage collector to reclaim the memory used by the batch. Setting thesizefield to 0 is important for consistency.
381-386: LGTM!The
GetByteSizemethod is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. The error handling is comprehensive and uses the predefined error variables. Returning the total size of the batch is useful for memory management.store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (5)
17-17: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
128-128: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
170-170: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 192-193
243-243: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 249-249
279-279: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 285-285
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2)
16-16: LGTM!The new import
coretestingfrom thecosmossdk.io/core/testingpackage is a valid addition.
99-99: Approved: The database initialization change looks good!The modification from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR's objective of replacingcosmos-dbuse cases in tests with thecore/testingframework.Assuming
coretesting.NewMemDB()returns a value that satisfies thecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinterface, this change ensures compatibility and is a step towards streamlining the testing process.x/upgrade/go.mod (1)
71-71: LGTM!The change aligns with the PR objective of removing the direct dependency on
cosmos-db. Moving it to the list of indirect dependencies is the correct approach since it is still required by other dependencies.simapp/app_test.go (4)
16-16: LGTM!The import change aligns with the transition to the new testing utility
coretesting.NewMemDB().
46-46: LGTM!The change is consistent with the transition to the new testing utility across the test suite.
88-88: LGTM!The change is consistent with the transition to the new testing utility across the test suite.
233-233: LGTM!The changes are consistent with the transition to the new testing utility across the test suite.
Also applies to: 272-272
store/snapshots/store.go (5)
30-30: LGTM!The change in the
dbfield type fromdb.DBtocorestore.KVStoreWithBatchis approved. This transition to a new database interface that supports batch operations aligns with the goal of enhancing the snapshot store's performance and efficiency.
38-38: LGTM!The change in the
dbparameter type fromdb.DBtocorestore.KVStoreWithBatchis approved. This change is consistent with the updatedStorestruct definition and ensures that the constructor function accepts the new database interface type.
63-63: LGTM!The change from
DeleteSynctoDeleteis approved. This transition from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operations could enhance the responsiveness of the snapshot store by allowing operations to proceed without blocking.
337-337: LGTM!The change from
SetSynctoSetis approved. This transition from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operations could enhance the responsiveness of the snapshot store by allowing operations to proceed without blocking.
17-17: LGTM!The addition of the
corestoreimport statement is approved. This import is necessary to support the changes made to theStorestruct andNewStorefunction, and it is correctly placed and formatted.core/testing/goleveldb.go (5)
25-56: LGTM!The
GoLevelDBstruct and its constructor functions look good:
- Wrapping
*leveldb.DBis a clean approach.- Using a default bloom filter in
NewGoLevelDBis a good optimization.- Allowing custom options in
NewGoLevelDBWithOptsprovides flexibility.
58-114: LGTM!The
Get,Has,SetandDeletemethod implementations look good:
- The empty key and nil value checks prevent invalid data from being stored.
- Errors are handled appropriately.
- Returning
ErrNotFoundasnilfromGetaligns with thecorestore.KVStoreinterface.
179-194: LGTM!The
IteratorandReverseIteratormethod implementations look good:
- Constructing a
goLevelDBIteratoris the right approach.- The iterators are initialized to the correct position based on the start and end keys, which is important for correct behavior.
196-328: LGTM!The
goLevelDBIteratorimplementation looks good:
- Wrapping
iterator.Iteratoris a clean approach.- Keeping track of the key range and direction is important for proper iteration.
- The
Validmethod correctly checks if the iterator is within the valid key range.- Returning copies from
KeyandValueis good for safety.- The
assertIsValidcalls inKeyandValueensure the iterator is not misused.
330-414: LGTM!The
goLevelDBBatchimplementation looks good:
- Wrapping
leveldb.Batchis a clean approach.- The empty key and nil value checks in
Setprevent invalid data from being added to the batch.- The
Closemethod correctly resets the batch to allow GC of the underlying data.orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (2)
363-363: LGTM!The return type changes in the
testStoreServicestruct methods are consistent and reflect the transition to thecorestorepackage. The changes are localized to the test code and do not affect the functionality.Also applies to: 367-367
397-397: LGTM!The return type change in the
ProvideTestRuntimefunction is consistent with the changes made in thetestStoreServicestruct and reflects the transition to thecorestorepackage. The change is localized to the test code and does not affect the functionality.store/prefix/store_test.go (4)
10-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
93-93: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
102-102: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 108-108, 154-154, 184-184, 212-212, 243-243
442-442: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
baseapp/utils_test.go (5)
22-22: LGTM!The addition of the
corestoreimport statement is approved.
209-209: Verify the usage of thedbfield in theparamStoremethods.The type of the
dbfield has been changed tocorestore.KVStoreWithBatch. Ensure that theSet,Has, andGetmethods ofparamStoreare compatible with the newdbtype.
Line range hint
214-221: LGTM!The
Setmethod is correctly using theSetmethod ofcorestore.KVStoreWithBatchto store the consensus parameters.
Line range hint
223-225: LGTM!The
Hasmethod is correctly using theHasmethod ofcorestore.KVStoreWithBatchto check the existence of the consensus parameters.
Line range hint
227-241: LGTM!The
Getmethod is correctly using theGetmethod ofcorestore.KVStoreWithBatchto retrieve the consensus parameters.docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1)
160-160: LGTM!The documentation update accurately reflects the change in the underlying memory database implementation used in
Transient.Store.store/cachekv/store_test.go (10)
10-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
18-18: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
26-26: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
69-69: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
77-77: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
293-293: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
310-310: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
329-329: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
377-377: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
437-437: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
store/iavl/store_test.go (18)
15-15: LGTM!The import statement for the
cosmossdk.io/core/testingpackage is correct.
Line range hint
40-58: LGTM!The changes to the
newAlohaTreefunction signature and implementation are correct. The function now accepts acorestore.KVStoreWithBatchparameter instead of*dbm.MemDB, which aligns with the objective of replacing the usage ofdbm.MemDB.
62-62: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestLoadStorefunction is correct.
124-124: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestGetImmutablefunction is correct.
157-157: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestTestGetImmutableIteratorfunction is correct.
180-180: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestIAVLStoreGetSetHasDeletefunction is correct.
205-205: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestIAVLStoreNoNilSetfunction is correct.
216-216: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestIAVLIteratorfunction is correct.
289-289: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestIAVLReverseIteratorfunction is correct.
323-323: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestIAVLPrefixIteratorfunction is correct.
386-386: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestIAVLReversePrefixIteratorfunction is correct.
453-453: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestIAVLNoPrunefunction is correct.
471-471: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theTestIAVLStoreQueryfunction is correct.
583-583: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in theBenchmarkIAVLIteratorNextfunction is correct.
613-613: LGTM!The change to the
storeFnfield in the test case struct to accept a parameter of typecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinstead of*dbm.MemDBis correct.
618-618: LGTM!The change to the
storeFnimplementation in the first test case to usecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinstead of*dbm.MemDBis correct.
627-627: LGTM!The change to the
storeFnimplementation in the second test case to usecorestore.KVStoreWithBatchinstead of*dbm.MemDBis correct.
645-645: LGTM!The change to use
coretesting.NewMemDB()instead ofdbm.NewMemDB()for initializing the database in the test cases is correct.baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)
22-22: LGTM!The import statement changes are approved. Removing the
dbmimport and adding thecoretestingimport aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related tocosmos-dbin the tests with thecore/testingframework.
480-480: LGTM!The
BaseAppinstantiation changes are approved. Replacingdbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective and the corresponding import statement changes.testutil/network/network.go (1)
223-223: Looks good!The change from
dbm.NewMemDB()tocoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the PR objective of replacingcosmos-dbuse cases in tests with thecore/testingframework. This helps eliminate thecosmos-dbdependency.baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12)
17-17: LGTM!The code change is approved. Importing the
coretestingpackage aligns with the transition to a new testing utility as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
71-71: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
81-81: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
99-99: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
119-119: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
238-238: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
361-361: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
390-390: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
413-413: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
450-450: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
699-699: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
845-845: LGTM!The code change is approved. Replacing
dbm.NewMemDB()withcoretesting.NewMemDB()aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.store/rootmulti/store_test.go (22)
25-25: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
31-31: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
48-48: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
64-64: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
72-72: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
125-125: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
155-155: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
208-208: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
357-357: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
436-436: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
530-530: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
562-562: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
603-603: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
656-656: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
672-672: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
696-696: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
715-715: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
731-731: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
742-742: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
792-792: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
933-933: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
973-973: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
store/mock/core_store.go (1)
1-956: LGTM!The auto-generated mock implementations in this file follow a consistent pattern and adhere to the Uber Go Style Guide. There are no obvious issues or deviations from best practices.
store/rootmulti/store.go (6)
19-19: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
22-22: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
631-631: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
1021-1021: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
1024-1024: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1243-1256: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
baseapp/abci_test.go (9)
Line range hint
49-81: LGTM!The
TestABCI_Infofunction looks good. It properly tests the ABCIInfomethod of theBaseApp, verifying the response values and checking that they are updated correctly after finalizing and committing a block. No issues or refactoring opportunities identified.
Line range hint
83-105: LGTM!The
TestABCI_First_block_Heightfunction properly tests the initial block height after initializing the chain. It verifies that the block height in the context is set to the specified initial height of 1 after committing the first block. The test is straightforward and covers the expected behavior.
Line range hint
107-190: LGTM!The
TestABCI_InitChainfunction provides a thorough test for the ABCIInitChainmethod of theBaseApp. It covers various scenarios, such as setting a customInitChainer, checking the state before and afterInitChain, and verifying the persistence of the state after committing a block. The test is well-structured and has comprehensive coverage. No issues or refactoring opportunities identified.
Line range hint
192-205: LGTM!The
TestABCI_InitChain_WithInitialHeightfunction provides a simple but effective test for the ABCIInitChainmethod with a custom initial height. It verifies that the last block height is set to the specified initial height of 3 after committing a block. The test covers the expected behavior and has no issues or refactoring opportunities.
Line range hint
207-242: LGTM!The
TestABCI_FinalizeBlock_WithInitialHeightfunction tests the ABCIFinalizeBlockmethod with a custom initial height. It covers the scenario where callingFinalizeBlockwith a height different from the initial height results in an error, while calling it with the correct height succeeds. The test also verifies that the last block height is set to the initial height after committing the block. The test coverage is adequate, and no issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.
Line range hint
244-311: LGTM!The
TestABCI_FinalizeBlock_WithBeginAndEndBlockerfunction provides a thorough test for the ABCIFinalizeBlockmethod with customBeginBlockerandEndBlockerfunctions. It verifies that the custom events added by theBeginBlockerandEndBlockerare present in theFinalizeBlockresponse and in the correct order. The test also checks that the last block height is updated after committing the block. The test coverage is comprehensive, and no issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.
Line range hint
313-393: LGTM!The
TestABCI_ExtendVotefunction provides a comprehensive test for the ABCIExtendVoteandVerifyVoteExtensionmethods of theBaseApp. It covers various scenarios, including calling the methods before and after the vote extensions enable height, verifying the responses, and testing error scenarios. The test sets up custom handlers for extending and verifying vote extensions and initializes the chain with vote extensions enabled at a specific height. The test coverage is extensive, and no major issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.
Line range hint
395-441: LGTM!The
TestABCI_OnlyVerifyVoteExtensionfunction provides a focused test for the ABCIVerifyVoteExtensionmethod without callingExtendVotebeforehand. It sets up a custom handler for verifying vote extensions and initializes the chain with vote extensions enabled at a specific height. The test covers callingVerifyVoteExtensionbefore and after the enable height, verifying the responses, and testing error scenarios. The test coverage is adequate for the specific scenario, and no issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.
Line range hint
443-487: LGTM!The
TestABCI_GRPCQueryfunction tests the ABCIQuerymethod with GRPC queries. It registers a custom GRPC query server implementation and covers the behavior of querying before the first block, expecting an error, and then querying after finalizing a block and committing, verifying the success and expected response. The test coverage is sufficient for the specific scenario, and no major issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.
| func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte) { | ||
| if len(bz) == 0 { | ||
| panic("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length") | ||
| } | ||
| ret = cp(bz) | ||
| for i := len(bz) - 1; i >= 0; i-- { | ||
| if ret[i] < byte(0xFF) { | ||
| ret[i]++ | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| ret[i] = byte(0x00) | ||
| if i == 0 { | ||
| // Overflow | ||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid panic and return an error instead.
Panicking on empty input is not idiomatic in Go. It's better to return an error.
Apply this diff to return an error instead of panicking:
-func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte) {
+func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte, err error) {
if len(bz) == 0 {
- panic("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length")
+ return nil, errors.New("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length")
}
ret = cp(bz)
for i := len(bz) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
if ret[i] < byte(0xFF) {
ret[i]++
- return
+ return ret, nil
}
ret[i] = byte(0x00)
if i == 0 {
// Overflow
- return nil
+ return nil, nil
}
}
- return nil
+ return nil, nil
}Also, update the function usage to handle the returned error.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte) { | |
| if len(bz) == 0 { | |
| panic("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length") | |
| } | |
| ret = cp(bz) | |
| for i := len(bz) - 1; i >= 0; i-- { | |
| if ret[i] < byte(0xFF) { | |
| ret[i]++ | |
| return | |
| } | |
| ret[i] = byte(0x00) | |
| if i == 0 { | |
| // Overflow | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte, err error) { | |
| if len(bz) == 0 { | |
| return nil, errors.New("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length") | |
| } | |
| ret = cp(bz) | |
| for i := len(bz) - 1; i >= 0; i-- { | |
| if ret[i] < byte(0xFF) { | |
| ret[i]++ | |
| return ret, nil | |
| } | |
| ret[i] = byte(0x00) | |
| if i == 0 { | |
| // Overflow | |
| return nil, nil | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return nil, nil | |
| } |
| func IsKeyInDomain(key, start, end []byte) bool { | ||
| if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 { | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
| if end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0 { | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
| return true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider simplifying the function by combining the if conditions.
The function can be simplified by combining the two if conditions into a single condition.
Apply this diff to simplify the function:
func IsKeyInDomain(key, start, end []byte) bool {
- if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 {
- return false
- }
- if end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0 {
+ if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 || (end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0) {
return false
}
return true
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func IsKeyInDomain(key, start, end []byte) bool { | |
| if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 { | |
| return false | |
| } | |
| if end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0 { | |
| return false | |
| } | |
| return true | |
| } | |
| func IsKeyInDomain(key, start, end []byte) bool { | |
| if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 || (end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0) { | |
| return false | |
| } | |
| return true | |
| } |
julienrbrt
added
the
backport/v0.52.x
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
|
conflicts pulled the pr out of the merge queue |
…#21525) (cherry picked from commit aaf72f2) # Conflicts: # core/testing/memdb.go # simapp/go.mod # simapp/sim_bench_test.go # store/cache/cache_test.go # store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go # store/cachekv/store.go # store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go # store/cachekv/store_test.go # store/dbadapter/store_test.go # store/gaskv/store_test.go # store/go.mod # store/go.sum # store/iavl/store_test.go # store/iavl/tree_test.go # store/listenkv/store_test.go # store/mem/store.go # store/prefix/store_test.go # store/pruning/manager_test.go # store/rootmulti/proof_test.go # store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go # store/rootmulti/store.go # store/rootmulti/store_test.go # store/snapshots/helpers_test.go # store/snapshots/manager_test.go # store/snapshots/store.go # store/snapshots/store_test.go # store/tracekv/store_test.go # store/transient/store.go # store/types/iterator_test.go # x/group/go.mod # x/nft/go.mod # x/params/go.mod
* main: test: fix sims (#21735) build: bump proto-builder (#21730) refactor(schema)!: rename IntegerStringKind and DecimalStringKind (#21694) feat(types/collections): add `LegacyDec` collection value (#21693) refactor(server): alias AppOptions to coreserver.DynamicConfig (#21711) refactor(simapp): simplify simapp di (#21718) feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with `core/testing` (#21525) feat(runtime/v2): store loader on simappv2 (#21704) docs(x/auth): vesting (#21715) build(deps): Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.66.1 to 1.66.2 (#21670) refactor(systemtest): Add cli.RunAndWait for common operations (#21689) fix(runtime/v2): provide default factory options if unset in app builder (#21690) chore: remove duplicate proto files for the same proto file (#21648) feat(x/genutil): add better error messages for genesis validation (#21701) build(deps): Bump cosmossdk.io/core from 1.0.0-alpha.1 to 1.0.0-alpha.2 (#21698) test: migrate e2e/bank to system tests (#21607) chore: fix the gci lint issue in testutil (#21695) docs(x/authz): update grant docs (#21677)
Description
ref: #21373
It is the second part of removing
cosmos-db.Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
coretesting.NewMemDB()for improved database handling in tests.minimum-gas-pricesfor better transaction fee management.Chores
go.modto include new testing utilities and remove outdated packages.