Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Add missing symbol in README.md #21640

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

liangmulu
Copy link
Contributor

@liangmulu liangmulu commented Sep 10, 2024

Description

Add missing symbol in README.md


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected a typographical error in the Architectural Decision Records documentation for improved clarity and professionalism.

@liangmulu liangmulu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 10, 2024 18:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a minor correction to the documentation of the Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) in the README.md file. It specifically addresses a typographical error by removing an incorrect period after the word "OPTIONAL," ensuring grammatical accuracy and adherence to the intended format. No changes were made to the functionality or logic of the codebase.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs/architecture/README.md Corrected punctuation error in ADR documentation regarding keywords in RFC 2119.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Documentation
    User->>Documentation: Request for ADR information
    Documentation-->>User: Provide ADR details
Loading

Tip

Announcements
  • The review status is no longer posted as a separate comment when there are no actionable or nitpick comments. In such cases, the review status is included in the walkthrough comment.
  • We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs: Walkthrough comment now includes a list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs in the walkthrough comment. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71fa043 and 1f19c42.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/architecture/README.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • docs/architecture/README.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title Add missing symbol in README.md docs: Add missing symbol in README.md Sep 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@meetrick meetrick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 04cec5b Sep 11, 2024
70 of 73 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2024
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants