Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(store/v2): human readable ss/sc types #21645

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt commented Sep 11, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced mock server configurations for enhanced testing and development.
  • Improvements
    • Updated configuration file to use descriptive string values for storage types, improving clarity and maintainability.
    • Enhanced server functionality by integrating a new store component for better state management.
  • Workflow Changes
    • Updated caching mechanism in GitHub Actions workflows to save RocksDB libraries instead of restoring them, improving dependency management efficiency.
    • Added steps to install necessary RocksDB dependencies, ensuring a smoother setup process.

@github-actions github-actions bot added C:Store C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 labels Sep 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new dependency on the store package in the server's test file, enhancing server functionality. The configuration file is updated to include a new mock server section and improves clarity by changing storage type representations from integers to strings. Additionally, the data types for storage types in the factory file are modified from integers to strings, along with associated constants and documentation. Workflow files are updated to change caching actions from restoring to saving.

Changes

File Change Summary
server/v2/server_test.go Added storeServer instance using store.New, enhancing server initialization with store functionality.
server/v2/testdata/app.toml Added [mock-server-1] section with mock fields; modified ss-type and sc-type from integers to strings.
store/v2/root/factory.go Changed SSType and SCType from integers to strings; updated constants and DefaultStoreOptions function.
.github/workflows/*.yml Changed caching actions from actions/cache/restore@v4 to actions/cache/save@v4 in multiple workflow files.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Server
    participant Store

    Client->>Server: Request
    Server->>Store: Access Data
    Store-->>Server: Return Data
    Server-->>Client: Response
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 08:03
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 071aa50 Sep 11, 2024
71 of 73 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julien/store-v2-types branch September 11, 2024 10:33
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2024
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 C:Store Type: CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants