Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(schema): rename ReferenceType to ReferenceableType #22698

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt commented Nov 29, 2024

Description

Quick renaming given what was discussed in our indexer sync.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated terminology from "Reference Type" to "Referenceable Type" across various components, enhancing clarity and consistency in the application.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted references in test cases to align with the new terminology, ensuring accurate testing of field comparisons.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments and documentation to reflect the changes in terminology for better understanding and usage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces terminology updates across several files in the schema package. Key changes include renaming methods and interfaces related to "reference type" to "referenceable type." The FieldDiff struct's method ReferenceTypeChanged is now ReferenceableTypeChanged, and similar updates are made in the EnumType struct and ReferenceType interface. Test cases are adjusted accordingly to reflect these changes, while the overall functionality and logic remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
schema/diff/field_diff.go Renamed ReferenceTypeChanged to ReferenceableTypeChanged; updated comments and method calls.
schema/diff/field_diff_test.go Updated test case to reference ReferenceableTypeChanged instead of ReferenceTypeChanged.
schema/enum.go Renamed method isReferenceType to isReferenceableType; no changes to functionality.
schema/type.go Renamed interface ReferenceType to ReferenceableType and method isReferenceType to isReferenceableType.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat(schema): add ReferenceType interface #21692: The changes in this PR introduce a new ReferenceType interface and modify the EnumType struct, which relates to the terminology changes in the main PR regarding reference types, specifically the renaming of methods to reflect "referenceable" terminology.

Suggested labels

C:schema

Suggested reviewers

  • testinginprod
  • cool-develope
  • tac0turtle

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6fb8299 and f37cf80.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • schema/diff/field_diff.go (4 hunks)
  • schema/diff/field_diff_test.go (1 hunks)
  • schema/enum.go (1 hunks)
  • schema/type.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
schema/diff/field_diff.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

schema/diff/field_diff_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

schema/enum.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

schema/type.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (5)
schema/diff/field_diff.go (2)

6-6: LGTM! Documentation updates are clear and consistent

The terminology changes from "reference type" to "referenceable type" in the comments are consistent with the PR objective and maintain good documentation practices.

Also applies to: 25-25, 29-29


55-55: Verify the impact of this breaking change

The rename from ReferenceTypeChanged to ReferenceableTypeChanged is consistent with the PR objective. However, since this is a public method, this change could potentially break existing code.

Let's verify the usage of this method across the codebase:

Also applies to: 68-69

✅ Verification successful

Breaking change is safe to proceed

The method rename from ReferenceTypeChanged to ReferenceableTypeChanged appears to be safe as:

  • The old method name ReferenceTypeChanged has no remaining references in the codebase
  • The new method name ReferenceableTypeChanged is only used within the same package (schema/diff)
  • All occurrences have been consistently updated in the implementation, tests, and documentation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old method name
rg "ReferenceTypeChanged" --type go

# Search for places where the new method is already being used
rg "ReferenceableTypeChanged" --type go

Length of output: 563

schema/type.go (2)

16-22: LGTM! Clear documentation and well-structured interface definition.

The interface documentation clearly explains its purpose and current implementation scope. The interface definition is clean and follows Go best practices.


18-22: Verify the impact of interface rename.

Renaming an interface can be a breaking change if it's part of the public API. Let's verify its usage across the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Interface rename appears to be a new addition, not a breaking change

Based on the search results, this appears to be a new interface addition rather than a rename. The ReferenceableType interface is only used internally within the schema package and its subpackages (schema/enum.go, schema/diff/*). There's no evidence of external usage or existing implementations that would be broken by this change.

The interface is properly implemented by EnumType and is used in field difference detection logic (FieldDiff), all within the same package scope. Since this appears to be a new addition rather than a rename of an existing interface, there's no risk of breaking existing code.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for external usage of the ReferenceType interface
# Look for any external packages importing and using this interface

# Search for imports of the schema package
rg --type go -l 'import.*"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/schema"'

# Search for direct usage of ReferenceType
rg --type go 'ReferenceType[^a-zA-Z]'

# Search for interface implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
  $$$
}

func ($_ $_) isReferenceType() {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 274


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any references to ReferenceableType (the new name)
rg --type go 'ReferenceableType'

# Let's also check git history to see if this is a new interface or a rename
git log -p --no-merges -- schema/type.go | grep -A 5 -B 5 'ReferenceType\|ReferenceableType'

# Let's check for any implementations of the new interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
  $$$
}

func ($_ $_) isReferenceableType() {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 889

schema/enum.go (1)

44-45: LGTM! Verify interface implementations.

The rename from isReferenceType to isReferenceableType is consistent with the PR objectives. The implementation follows Go idioms for interface markers.

Let's verify that all implementers of the interface have been updated consistently:

✅ Verification successful

Rename from ReferenceType to ReferenceableType verified

The change is correctly implemented. The interface ReferenceableType is properly defined in schema/type.go and the EnumType implementation in schema/enum.go matches the interface name. No other implementations were found, confirming this is a complete and consistent rename.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old interface name
# and verify all implementations are updated

# Check for any remaining references to isReferenceType
rg "isReferenceType"

# Find all types implementing the interface
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ $_) isReferenceableType()'

Length of output: 157


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for all type definitions and their interface implementations
# to ensure we catch all relevant types

# First, let's see the interface definition
rg -B2 -A2 "isReferenceType" schema/type.go

# Then find all struct types that might implement this interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct'

# Also check for any other potential implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ $_) isType()'

Length of output: 222


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's do a more comprehensive search to find all implementations
# and any potential missed renames

# Find interface definition and all implementations
rg -l "isReferenceableType|isReferenceType" --type go

# Show the content of these files to analyze the implementations
fd -e go -x cat {} \; -x echo "=== END OF {} ==="

Length of output: 163433


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the interface definition and all implementations
# to ensure we have a complete picture

# First, let's see the interface definition and related types
rg -A5 "type.*Type.*interface" schema/type.go

# Then find all implementations of isReferenceableType
rg -A1 "func.*isReferenceableType"

Length of output: 675

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ func Test_compareField(t *testing.T) {
OldReferencedType: "old",
NewReferencedType: "new",
},
trueF: FieldDiff.ReferenceTypeChanged,
trueF: FieldDiff.ReferenceableTypeChanged,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

The rename from ReferenceType to ReferenceableType is inconsistent in one location

There's still one occurrence of the old terminology in schema/type.go where the comment isReferenceType hasn't been updated to match the new isReferenceableType method name.

  • schema/type.go: Update the comment // isReferenceType is implemented if this is a reference type. to use the new terminology.
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! The rename is consistent with PR objectives.

The update from ReferenceTypeChanged to ReferenceableTypeChanged aligns with the PR's goal of standardizing terminology.

Let's verify the consistency of this rename across the codebase:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all occurrences of ReferenceType have been updated to ReferenceableType
# and that there are no lingering old references.

echo "Checking for any remaining 'ReferenceType' occurrences..."
rg "ReferenceType" --type go

echo "Verifying new 'ReferenceableType' usage..."
rg "ReferenceableType" --type go

Length of output: 1135

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 3, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Dec 3, 2024
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 1c4dc89 Dec 3, 2024
72 of 73 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julien/schema branch December 3, 2024 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants