-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(schema): rename ReferenceType
to ReferenceableType
#22698
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces terminology updates across several files in the schema package. Key changes include renaming methods and interfaces related to "reference type" to "referenceable type." The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
schema/diff/field_diff.go
(4 hunks)schema/diff/field_diff_test.go
(1 hunks)schema/enum.go
(1 hunks)schema/type.go
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
schema/diff/field_diff.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
schema/diff/field_diff_test.go (2)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern **/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
schema/enum.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
schema/type.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
schema/diff/field_diff.go (2)
6-6
: LGTM! Documentation updates are clear and consistent
The terminology changes from "reference type" to "referenceable type" in the comments are consistent with the PR objective and maintain good documentation practices.
Also applies to: 25-25, 29-29
55-55
: Verify the impact of this breaking change
The rename from ReferenceTypeChanged
to ReferenceableTypeChanged
is consistent with the PR objective. However, since this is a public method, this change could potentially break existing code.
Let's verify the usage of this method across the codebase:
Also applies to: 68-69
✅ Verification successful
Breaking change is safe to proceed
The method rename from ReferenceTypeChanged
to ReferenceableTypeChanged
appears to be safe as:
- The old method name
ReferenceTypeChanged
has no remaining references in the codebase - The new method name
ReferenceableTypeChanged
is only used within the same package (schema/diff
) - All occurrences have been consistently updated in the implementation, tests, and documentation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old method name
rg "ReferenceTypeChanged" --type go
# Search for places where the new method is already being used
rg "ReferenceableTypeChanged" --type go
Length of output: 563
schema/type.go (2)
16-22
: LGTM! Clear documentation and well-structured interface definition.
The interface documentation clearly explains its purpose and current implementation scope. The interface definition is clean and follows Go best practices.
18-22
: Verify the impact of interface rename.
Renaming an interface can be a breaking change if it's part of the public API. Let's verify its usage across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Interface rename appears to be a new addition, not a breaking change
Based on the search results, this appears to be a new interface addition rather than a rename. The ReferenceableType
interface is only used internally within the schema package and its subpackages (schema/enum.go, schema/diff/*). There's no evidence of external usage or existing implementations that would be broken by this change.
The interface is properly implemented by EnumType
and is used in field difference detection logic (FieldDiff
), all within the same package scope. Since this appears to be a new addition rather than a rename of an existing interface, there's no risk of breaking existing code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for external usage of the ReferenceType interface
# Look for any external packages importing and using this interface
# Search for imports of the schema package
rg --type go -l 'import.*"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/schema"'
# Search for direct usage of ReferenceType
rg --type go 'ReferenceType[^a-zA-Z]'
# Search for interface implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}
func ($_ $_) isReferenceType() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 274
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any references to ReferenceableType (the new name)
rg --type go 'ReferenceableType'
# Let's also check git history to see if this is a new interface or a rename
git log -p --no-merges -- schema/type.go | grep -A 5 -B 5 'ReferenceType\|ReferenceableType'
# Let's check for any implementations of the new interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}
func ($_ $_) isReferenceableType() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 889
schema/enum.go (1)
44-45
: LGTM! Verify interface implementations.
The rename from isReferenceType
to isReferenceableType
is consistent with the PR objectives. The implementation follows Go idioms for interface markers.
Let's verify that all implementers of the interface have been updated consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Rename from ReferenceType to ReferenceableType verified
The change is correctly implemented. The interface ReferenceableType
is properly defined in schema/type.go
and the EnumType
implementation in schema/enum.go
matches the interface name. No other implementations were found, confirming this is a complete and consistent rename.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old interface name
# and verify all implementations are updated
# Check for any remaining references to isReferenceType
rg "isReferenceType"
# Find all types implementing the interface
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ $_) isReferenceableType()'
Length of output: 157
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for all type definitions and their interface implementations
# to ensure we catch all relevant types
# First, let's see the interface definition
rg -B2 -A2 "isReferenceType" schema/type.go
# Then find all struct types that might implement this interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct'
# Also check for any other potential implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ $_) isType()'
Length of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's do a more comprehensive search to find all implementations
# and any potential missed renames
# Find interface definition and all implementations
rg -l "isReferenceableType|isReferenceType" --type go
# Show the content of these files to analyze the implementations
fd -e go -x cat {} \; -x echo "=== END OF {} ==="
Length of output: 163433
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the interface definition and all implementations
# to ensure we have a complete picture
# First, let's see the interface definition and related types
rg -A5 "type.*Type.*interface" schema/type.go
# Then find all implementations of isReferenceableType
rg -A1 "func.*isReferenceableType"
Length of output: 675
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ func Test_compareField(t *testing.T) { | |||
OldReferencedType: "old", | |||
NewReferencedType: "new", | |||
}, | |||
trueF: FieldDiff.ReferenceTypeChanged, | |||
trueF: FieldDiff.ReferenceableTypeChanged, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
The rename from ReferenceType
to ReferenceableType
is inconsistent in one location
There's still one occurrence of the old terminology in schema/type.go
where the comment isReferenceType
hasn't been updated to match the new isReferenceableType
method name.
schema/type.go
: Update the comment// isReferenceType is implemented if this is a reference type.
to use the new terminology.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! The rename is consistent with PR objectives.
The update from ReferenceTypeChanged
to ReferenceableTypeChanged
aligns with the PR's goal of standardizing terminology.
Let's verify the consistency of this rename across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all occurrences of ReferenceType have been updated to ReferenceableType
# and that there are no lingering old references.
echo "Checking for any remaining 'ReferenceType' occurrences..."
rg "ReferenceType" --type go
echo "Verifying new 'ReferenceableType' usage..."
rg "ReferenceableType" --type go
Length of output: 1135
Description
Quick renaming given what was discussed in our indexer sync.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation