Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(systemtests): correct the binary version #23106

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

hoank101
Copy link
Contributor

@hoank101 hoank101 commented Dec 28, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated system test documentation with new binary name from simd to simdv2
    • Refined test execution instructions in README by removing an extra space in the command syntax
    • Clarified binary copying process for system tests

@hoank101 hoank101 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 28, 2024 03:52
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the system test documentation by changing the binary name from simd to simdv2 in two files. It modifies the instructions for building and copying binaries for system tests, ensuring that the correct binary version is referenced. Additionally, the command for running tests has been adjusted by removing the --verbose flag. The overall structure and content of the documentation remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
systemtests/getting_started.md Updated binary copy command from simd to simdv2 and removed --verbose flag from test command.
tests/systemtests/README.md Modified binary copy instructions from simd to simdv2 and removed extra space in test running command.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • julienrbrt
  • akhilkumarpilli
  • sontrinh16

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e5f47d and 5b1ddcb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • systemtests/getting_started.md (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • systemtests/getting_started.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@hoank101 hoank101 changed the title chore: correct the binary version chore(systemtests): correct the binary version Dec 28, 2024
@hoank101 hoank101 changed the title chore(systemtests): correct the binary version fix(systemtests): correct the binary version Dec 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/systemtests/README.md (1)

Line range hint 1-47: Documentation structure and content is well-organized

The README provides clear instructions and covers all necessary aspects including setup, execution, and OS-specific considerations. The documentation is well-structured and free from spelling or grammatical errors.

Consider adding:

  1. A note about the binary version change in the changelog
  2. A troubleshooting section for common issues
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a533fd and 9e5f47d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • systemtests/getting_started.md (1 hunks)
  • tests/systemtests/README.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • systemtests/getting_started.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
tests/systemtests/README.md (2)

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"


Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/systemtests/README.md (2)

34-34: LGTM! Improved command formatting

The removal of extra whitespace in the test command improves readability while maintaining functionality.


28-28: Verify binary name consistency across documentation

The binary name change from simd to simdv2 looks correct, but let's ensure this change is consistently applied across all documentation.

Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old binary name:

✅ Verification successful

Binary name change is consistent with system test configuration

The change from simd to simdv2 in the README.md is consistent with the system test configuration. The Makefile explicitly handles this binary name change through the build option flag:

$(if $(findstring v2,$(COSMOS_BUILD_OPTIONS)),--binary=simdv2)

This indicates that when the v2 build option is enabled, the system tests will use simdv2 as the binary name, which aligns with the documentation change in the README.md.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to 'simd' binary
# Exclude git files and binary files to focus on documentation
rg --type-add 'docs:*.{md,txt,rst}' -t docs 'simd(?!v2)' 

Length of output: 276


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to 'simd' binary using PCRE2
# Exclude git files and binary files to focus on documentation
rg --pcre2 --type-add 'docs:*.{md,txt,rst}' -t docs 'simd(?!v2)'

# Also search with simple pattern to ensure we don't miss anything
rg --type-add 'docs:*.{md,txt,rst}' -t docs '\bsimd\b'

Length of output: 66191


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any references to the binary name in build or test scripts
rg -g '*.{sh,bash,py}' 'simdv2|simd' tests/systemtests/

Length of output: 57


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any references to the binary name in all files under tests/systemtests
find tests/systemtests -type f -exec grep -l "simd\|simdv2" {} \;

# Also check for any build scripts in the root directory that might reference the binary
find . -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "*.sh" -exec grep -l "simd\|simdv2" {} \;

Length of output: 264


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of these files to understand the binary name usage
echo "=== Content of tests/systemtests/README.md ==="
cat tests/systemtests/README.md

echo -e "\n=== Content of tests/systemtests/Makefile ==="
cat tests/systemtests/Makefile

echo -e "\n=== Content of tests/systemtests/upgrade_test.go ==="
cat tests/systemtests/upgrade_test.go

Length of output: 6705

Copy link
Member

@tac0turtle tac0turtle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these are examples they are fine to stay as is.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle closed this Dec 28, 2024
@hoank101 hoank101 deleted the hoa/update-docs branch December 28, 2024 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants