docs: fix the outdated description of transaction.Msg

[suiyuan1314]

Description

#21239 has made a change for transaction.Msg, now it's no longer an alias of proto.Message

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated description of transaction.Msg interface
  • Clarified the implementation details of the message interface
  • Refined documentation to provide more accurate representation of code structure

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the documentation for the transaction.Msg interface in the building modules documentation. The change removes a previous description stating that transaction.Msg is an alias of proto.Message and replaces it with a more precise explanation about using structural types to define the message interface. The modification aims to provide a more accurate representation of the interface's implementation without changing any functional aspects of the code.

Changes

File	Change Summary
docs/build/building-modules/02-messages-and-queries.md	Updated description of transaction.Msg interface, removing the alias statement and adding a description of structural type usage

Suggested Reviewers

• julienrbrt
• tac0turtle
• sontrinh16

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

docs/build/building-modules/02-messages-and-queries.md (1)

41-41: Consider adding more context about structural types.

While the description is accurate, it would be helpful to add a brief explanation of what structural types are and why they're used for defining the message interface. This would provide better clarity for developers.

-`transaction.Msg` uses structural types to define the interface for a message. 
+`transaction.Msg` uses structural types to define the interface for a message. Structural types allow the interface to be implemented based on the structure and methods of a type, rather than explicit interface implementation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a03c90b and 3d08f2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/build/building-modules/02-messages-and-queries.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

docs/build/building-modules/02-messages-and-queries.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)

• GitHub Check: repo-analysis
• GitHub Check: build (arm64)
• GitHub Check: build (amd64)
• GitHub Check: markdown-link-check
• GitHub Check: dependency-review
• GitHub Check: Summary

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/build/building-modules/02-messages-and-queries.md (1)

44-44: LGTM!

The reference link is correctly updated to point to the current implementation of the transaction.Msg interface.