Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
types: update coin regex #7027
types: update coin regex #7027
Changes from 5 commits
fbec784
497e011
2b22419
9df2c67
431ede8
afe2627
9d4c70e
216ebc8
595a9d2
cbb88a0
88a6874
0bd648f
e7c09f7
94fb4a9
549e121
12eece3
9945305
e12e38d
928099c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this test enforces the ordering by denom as published.
I just think if you normalize cases one place, they should be normalized everywhere.
Also, what if we have
bal := Coins{{"atom", NewInt(10)}}
and thenbal.Sub(Coins{{"ATOM", NewInt(3)}})
. What is the expected behavior?Either
"atom" == "ATOM"
everywhere or nowhere - if they are considered dups, they should be treated the same by all math functions.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought
"atom" != "ATOM"
everywhere? Is this not correct @fedekunze ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I removed it now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: usually this is some sort of table test, no?
Personally, I like the named table test:
They are all run separately and each failure has the name from the upper test case map.