Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fuzz: add oss-fuzz build status link #9153

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2021
Merged

fuzz: add oss-fuzz build status link #9153

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2021

Conversation

cuonglm
Copy link
Contributor

@cuonglm cuonglm commented Apr 21, 2021

Description

While at it, also update example package path.


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

While at it, also update example package path.
@cuonglm
Copy link
Contributor Author

cuonglm commented Apr 21, 2021

cc @odeke-em

Copy link
Collaborator

@odeke-em odeke-em left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @cuonglm!

@odeke-em odeke-em merged commit 489ec6b into cosmos:fuzz-packages Apr 21, 2021
@odeke-em odeke-em deleted the cuonglm/update-fuzzing-readme branch April 21, 2021 00:56
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2021
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2021
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2021
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2021
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2021
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2021
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2021
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2022
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2022
While at it, also update the example package path.
elias-orijtech pushed a commit to elias-orijtech/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
While at it, also update the example package path.
elias-orijtech pushed a commit to elias-orijtech/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
While at it, also update the example package path.
elias-orijtech pushed a commit to elias-orijtech/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
While at it, also update the example package path.
elias-orijtech pushed a commit to elias-orijtech/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2022
While at it, also update the example package path.
odeke-em pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2022
While at it, also update the example package path.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants