chore: Add script to validate gentxs

[anilcse]

Description

ref: #9304

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[anilcse]

I believe we should add some documentation for this but not sure on a best place. Any suggestions @AmauryM @clevinson @robert-zaremba ?

[amaury1093]

I believe we should add some documentation for this but not sure on a best place.

I think a scripts/README.md is fine for now.

[amaury1093]

Hey @anilcse any progress on the documentation?

[ruhatch]

Looks good, but a comment about go installation

[amaury1093]

lgtm.

@anilcse I wonder if it would be useful to verify gentx signatures inside the collect-gentxs subcommand? I.e. verify signatures via the Go code we already have.

[ruhatch]

LGTM!

[anilcse]

lgtm.

@anilcse I wonder if it would be useful to verify gentx signatures inside the collect-gentxs subcommand? I.e. verify signatures via the Go code we already have.

That's a good idea, I will look into it. May be we can drop this PR if we find a simple tweak there.

[amaury1093]

@anilcse any progress on this?

We can also merge this, it's still an improvement. And we can not close #9304 and add a follow-up to try to see if we can use Go code.

[anilcse]

@anilcse any progress on this?

We can also merge this, it's still an improvement. And we can not close #9304 and add a follow-up to try to see if we can use Go code.

Yeah that sounds good. I didn't get good time to look into the possibility of handling it via go code directly. I will spend sometime this week.

[orijbot]

Visit https://dashboard.github.orijtech.com?pr=9486&repo=cosmos%2Fcosmos-sdk to see benchmark details.