Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: multisig should accept name, not just address #9553

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jun 23, 2021

Conversation

likhita-809
Copy link
Contributor

@likhita-809 likhita-809 commented Jun 21, 2021

ref: #9407

--multisig should accept name, not just an address


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #9553 (78fb42a) into master (29c7a46) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 33.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9553      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.66%   60.66%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         588      588              
  Lines       37250    37265      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits        22599    22607       +8     
- Misses      12707    12714       +7     
  Partials     1944     1944              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
x/auth/client/cli/tx_sign.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/auth/client/testutil/suite.go 95.37% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@amaury1093 amaury1093 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a test for this?

Copy link
Contributor

@alexanderbez alexanderbez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/auth/client/cli/tx_sign.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
x/auth/client/cli/tx_sign.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@likhita-809 likhita-809 requested a review from amaury1093 June 23, 2021 10:15
Copy link
Contributor

@amaury1093 amaury1093 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK. @likhita-809 did you manually test this? If yes, you can put automerge on.

@likhita-809
Copy link
Contributor Author

utACK. @likhita-809 did you manually test this? If yes, you can put automerge on.

manually tested.

@likhita-809 likhita-809 added the A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. label Jun 23, 2021
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 8f21e26 into master Jun 23, 2021
@mergify mergify bot deleted the likhita/add-name-for-multisig branch June 23, 2021 16:22
@likhita-809 likhita-809 mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2021
20 tasks
This was referenced May 12, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2022
## Description

ref: #11362 

I did **NOT** review the following folders, as they contain cryptography which I don't think I'm competent enough to give a useful review:
- [ ] `crypto/xsalsa20symmetric` (new in v046, ported from TM i think)
- [ ] `crypto/keys/secp256k1` (some new stuff in v046 too)

Also performed some manual tests as part of #11939:

  - [x] Create keys on v0.45, make sure they still work in v0.46 #11939 (comment)
  - [x] Create new keys in v0.46 #11939 (comment)
  - [x] `--multisig` flag works with an address that's not in the keyring (see [repro](#9553))



---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. C:CLI C:x/auth
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants