Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Better lock handling on close #1024

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

alpe
Copy link
Contributor

@alpe alpe commented Dec 17, 2024

Same as #1023 targeting master now

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for node retrieval methods.
    • Enhanced checks for active readers before deletions to ensure data integrity.
  • New Features

    • Added a test case to validate the behavior of the Close method when called multiple times.
  • Documentation

    • Updated test cases to cover various scenarios related to storage version management and error handling.

(cherry picked from commit 7e773d2)
@alpe alpe requested a review from a team as a code owner December 17, 2024 12:44
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes focus on improving the nodedb.go implementation, particularly in the nodeDB struct and its methods. The modifications enhance error handling, prevent potential deadlocks, and improve the control flow of database operations. Key updates include refining the Close and startPruning methods, adding more robust error checking in node retrieval and storage version management, and ensuring thread-safe operations during pruning and deletion processes.

Changes

File Changes
nodedb.go - Updated Close() method to lock mutex after context cancellation
- Modified startPruning() to close done channel
- Improved error handling in GetNode() and GetFastNode()
- Added format validation in SetFastStorageVersionToBatch()
- Enhanced concurrency safety in deleteFromPruning() and saveNodeFromPruning()
- Strengthened version deletion checks in DeleteVersionsTo()
nodedb_test.go - Added test case for multiple Close() method calls
- Maintained comprehensive test coverage for storage version management
- Preserved performance benchmarks

Poem

🐰 In the realm of nodes and database might,
Where bits and bytes dance with delight,
Our pruning logic now stands tall and clean,
No deadlocks lurk, no errors unseen!
A rabbit's code, both swift and bright! 🔍

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9c402d and bf2163d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • nodedb.go (2 hunks)
  • nodedb_test.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
nodedb.go (2)

603-605: Properly signal pruning completion by closing ndb.done

The close(ndb.done) call before returning in the startPruning method ensures that any goroutines waiting on the done channel are notified when pruning is complete. This prevents potential goroutine leaks and ensures clean shutdown of the pruning process.


1125-1132: Prevent deadlocks by adjusting the mutex lock in Close()

By moving the mutex lock to after the context cancellation and waiting for the pruning to finish, the Close method avoids holding the lock while potentially blocking operations occur. This change prevents possible deadlocks between Close and startPruning, ensuring that Close does not block if startPruning is waiting for the mutex.

nodedb_test.go (1)

447-447: Ensure Close() is idempotent and does not block on subsequent calls

The additional call to ndb.Close() in the TestCloseNodeDB test confirms that calling Close multiple times does not result in blocking or errors. This test enhances the robustness of the nodeDB implementation by verifying that Close is safe to call multiple times.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt merged commit f7bbb9d into master Dec 17, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the alex_fix_lock_on_close_main branch December 17, 2024 14:03
mmsqe pushed a commit to mmsqe/iavl that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
tac0turtle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
Co-authored-by: Alexander Peters <alpe@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants