Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update godoc of RegisterInterchainAccount #1256

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 14, 2022

Conversation

crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The godoc of RegisterInterchainAccount was still saying that the port identifier was constructed using as well the connection identifiers. I corrected that.

closes: #XXXX


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

Copy link
Member

@damiannolan damiannolan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 4872c4b into main Apr 14, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the carlos/update-godoc-registerinterchainaccount branch April 14, 2022 07:53
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2022
## Description

The godoc of `RegisterInterchainAccount` was still saying that the port identifier was constructed using as well the connection identifiers. I corrected that.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [x] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit 4872c4b)
colin-axner added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2022
## Description

The godoc of `RegisterInterchainAccount` was still saying that the port identifier was constructed using as well the connection identifiers. I corrected that.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [x] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit 4872c4b)

Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <carlos@interchain.io>
Co-authored-by: colin axnér <25233464+colin-axner@users.noreply.github.com>
ellie4x pushed a commit to Carina-labs/ibc-go that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2022
## Description

The godoc of `RegisterInterchainAccount` was still saying that the port identifier was constructed using as well the connection identifiers. I corrected that.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [x] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit 4872c4b)

Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <carlos@interchain.io>
Co-authored-by: colin axnér <25233464+colin-axner@users.noreply.github.com>
dudong2 pushed a commit to dudong2/ibc-go that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2023
## Description

The godoc of `RegisterInterchainAccount` was still saying that the port identifier was constructed using as well the connection identifiers. I corrected that.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [x] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit 4872c4b)

Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <carlos@interchain.io>
Co-authored-by: colin axnér <25233464+colin-axner@users.noreply.github.com>
CosmosCar pushed a commit to caelus-labs/ibc-go that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2023
Co-authored-by: Ganesha Upadhyaya <gupadhyaya@Ganeshas-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants