-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 616
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: replace usage of verification funcs in 03-connection #1647
Merged
damiannolan
merged 6 commits into
02-client-refactor
from
damian/1293-verify-03-connection-funcs
Jul 7, 2022
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dcf7924
replacing 03-connection verifications with generic membership methods
damiannolan 13383ac
adding inline comments for skipping delay period checks
damiannolan 75ef0cc
Merge branch '02-client-refactor' into damian/1293-verify-03-connecti…
damiannolan 7a4120d
Merge branch '02-client-refactor' into damian/1293-verify-03-connecti…
damiannolan 5c52b95
chore: removing legacy verify funcs from `ClientState` interface (#1649)
damiannolan dcd0dd9
fixing interface definition
damiannolan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
might be nice to add an inline comment for future readers:
or something along those lines
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think we should add test cases for each of the verify functions with the time/block delay periods set to 0. That is, add test cases which will normally fail on the delay period not being passed (if 0, 0, isn't passed in). Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great idea, I'll add the inline comment.
So if 0, 0, isn't passed in here it won't fail? there's nothing at the lightclient level which would return an error, and it needs to be generic to support both zero values and non zero values for delay periods, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's address this with a follow up if needs be.