-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(ica): packet data unmarshaling logic refactored #4232
Merged
srdtrk
merged 13 commits into
main
from
serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpacketdata
Aug 21, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
068f0da
refactor(ica): refactored packet data's unmarshal logic
srdtrk 8f0f35e
fix(ica_test): made tests pass
srdtrk ab9a619
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk d3b2775
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk 87e6549
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk e58aa8d
merge: branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpac…
srdtrk ae95265
imp(ica): changed to UnmarshalJSON api
srdtrk 329be08
merge: branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpac…
srdtrk 01619ac
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk 2847751
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk 6bc3d9e
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk bc5e40d
merge: branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpac…
srdtrk dc40ae1
docs(ica): added godocs to iapd's 'UnmarshalJSON' method
srdtrk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ func (iapd InterchainAccountPacketData) GetBytes() []byte { | |
return sdk.MustSortJSON(ModuleCdc.MustMarshalJSON(&iapd)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
// UnmarshalJSON unmarshals raw JSON bytes into an InterchainAccountPacketData. | ||
func (iapd *InterchainAccountPacketData) UnmarshalJSON(bz []byte) error { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could we add a godoc? :) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. done |
||
return ModuleCdc.UnmarshalJSON(bz, iapd) | ||
} | ||
|
||
// GetBytes returns the JSON marshalled interchain account CosmosTx. | ||
func (ct CosmosTx) GetBytes() []byte { | ||
return sdk.MustSortJSON(ModuleCdc.MustMarshalJSON(&ct)) | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am fine with this approach, but maybe an alternative could be to have instead and constructor function if that's possible? Like this:
It just feels more natural to me that declaring the value and then mutating it. That way we don't mix value and pointer receiver functions in the type, which I think it's another go proverb? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is exactly what I did originally, but @damiannolan and @DimitrisJim were slightly favouring the current approach. I'm curious what others think. Regardless, I apparently can't merge this until ica code owners approve it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, funny, haha! :) Well, if the majority prefers the current approach, I am ok with it.