fix: require authority to pass proof if channel state is in FLUSHCOMPLETE for upgrade cancellation

[charleenfei]

Description

closes: #5319

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

type: commit message

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
• Wrote unit and integration tests.
• Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
• Added relevant godoc comments.
• Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
• Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

[colin-axner]

ACK, thanks!

Should we have a test case for:
sender is authority, error receipt sequence less than channel upgrade sequence

I see the test case when the sender isn't authority, but it might be nice to have the authority case as well