remove mustsortjson usuage

[chandiniv1]

closes: #3919

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (7c48b96) 80.12% compared to head (69a7a8d) 80.10%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5395      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.12%   80.10%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         189      189              
  Lines       13140    13143       +3     
==========================================
  Hits        10528    10528              
- Misses       2199     2202       +3     
  Partials      413      413              

Files	Coverage Δ
modules/apps/29-fee/types/ack.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

[crodriguezvega]

@chandiniv1 Thank you so much for contributing to ibc-go and for opening so many PRs already! We are extremely busy at the moment wrapping up some important work before the end of the year (for 08-wasm and channel upgradability), and therefore we might not be able to dedicate enough time to review your PRs until the new year. Apologies for that, but we hope that you understand.

We also wanted to ask you that, in the future, when you would like to pick up an issue, you comment on it first. This is part of the process that we have outlined in our contributing guidelines. This is a very useful signalling mechanism, so that we prevent situations where multiple people might be working on the same issue. If you could do that next time you would like to work on an issue, we would appreciate that greatly. Thank you!

[chandiniv1]

@chandiniv1 Thank you so much for contributing to ibc-go and for opening so many PRs already! We are extremely busy at the moment wrapping up some important work before the end of the year (for 08-wasm and channel upgradability), and therefore we might not be able to dedicate enough time to review your PRs until the new year. Apologies for that, but we hope that you understand.

We also wanted to ask you that, in the future, when you would like to pick up an issue, you comment on it first. This is part of the process that we have outlined in our contributing guidelines. This is a very useful signalling mechanism, so that we prevent situations where multiple people might be working on the same issue. If you could do that next time you would like to work on an issue, we would appreciate that greatly. Thank you!

okay thank you @crodriguezvega

[DimitrisJim]

thanks!