Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: add test for ReceiveEnabled set to false #6054

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bznein
Copy link
Contributor

@bznein bznein commented Mar 22, 2024

Description

Adds a test for ReceiveEnabled set to false

closes: #1913

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added new test cases in the transfer module to simulate scenarios with receiving disabled, ensuring robust handling of control flow based on the ReceiveEnabled parameter.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces two additional test cases within the TestOnRecvPacket function of the KeeperTestSuite module, specifically targeting scenarios where IBC transfers are disabled. These tests are designed to validate the module's behavior when the ReceiveEnabled flag is set to false, ensuring that transfers are correctly halted and that the system reacts as expected under these constrained conditions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../transfer/keeper/relay_test.go Added two test cases in TestOnRecvPacket for scenarios with ReceiveEnabled set to false.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add test cases for apps/transfer failing with sends/receives disabled (#1913)
Migrate unit tests to use entrypoints for methods on light client module to improve code coverage (#6001) The changes are specific to the apps/transfer module and do not directly relate to light clients.
Add e2e test coverage for relay after IBC genesis restart upgrade, including client updates (#3476) The update focuses on testing the ReceiveEnabled flag within the transfer module.
Align testing package behavior with expected ABCI handler flow through refactoring and new functions (#3997) Changes are confined to adding test cases and do not involve ABCI handler flow adjustments.

Related issues

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

}, false, false,
},
{
"failure: receive is disabled - chainB is source",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not familiar enough with the codebase to know if this case is needed. Happy to delete it in case it is not :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's not strictly necessary but should do no harm in including it!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I would remove just to keep it the test tight and clean, but will not fight over it. :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed it :) I was a bit on the verge, not being familiar enough with the codebase.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5514d56 and bd7ce46.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay_test.go (1)
  • 340-358: The addition of test cases to verify the behavior when ReceiveEnabled is set to false is a valuable enhancement to the test suite. It's crucial to ensure that the system behaves as expected under these conditions, aligning with the operational requirements outlined in the linked issue Add tests cases for disabled IBC transfers #1913. These tests effectively simulate scenarios where receiving IBC transfers is disabled, contributing significantly to the robustness of the test suite.

However, it's important to also verify the state of the system after the test execution, especially for the second test case where expEscrowAmount is set despite receiving being disabled. Ensure that the system's state aligns with expectations, such as checking if the escrow amount remains unchanged or if any other state variables are affected by the disabled receive functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

@chatton chatton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @bznein ❤️

}, false, false,
},
{
"failure: receive is disabled - chainB is source",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's not strictly necessary but should do no harm in including it!

Copy link
Contributor

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @bznein!

}, false, false,
},
{
"failure: receive is disabled - chainB is source",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I would remove just to keep it the test tight and clean, but will not fight over it. :)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd7ce46 and d3daaa5.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay_test.go

@chatton chatton merged commit 572d8e8 into cosmos:main Mar 25, 2024
72 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add tests cases for disabled IBC transfers
3 participants