-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore:fix export function name #6249
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates involve renaming functions across different modules to better reflect their purposes and adjusting function behaviors. Specifically, changes include renaming a function related to forward relayer addresses, updating command function names in CLI query operations, and redefining an ante handler to focus on specific transaction types in a multi-message context. Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml Files selected for processing (2)
Additional Context UsedPath-based Instructions (2)
Additional comments not posted (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
modules/core/ante/ante.go (2)
19-19
: Update the comment to reflect the new function name and clarify its purpose.
19-19
: Consider improving the clarity of the comment by specifying what constitutes a "redundant" packet message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, @seay404
Description
continuation:#6247
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the GitHub PR explorer.SonarCloud Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
fmt.Errorf
toerrors.New
for specific messages related to the wasm consensus host.Refactor
RedundantRelayDecorator
toAnteHandle
for better clarity and adjusted the function's description.Bug Fixes
CheckLibwasmVersion
function to useerrors.New
for consistency and clarity.