Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

imp: allow memo strings instead of keys for transfer authorizations (backport #6268) #6289

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented May 10, 2024

Description

closes: #6095


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated the description of AllowedPacketData in the TransferAuthorization documentation to specify JSON-encoded memo strings.
  • New Features

    • Revised the handling of memo data in authorization processes to utilize JSON-encoded memo strings instead of packet data keys.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified the validateMemo function, enhancing memo validation efficiency and clarity.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #6268 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

…6268)

* imp: allow memo strings instead of keys for transfer authorizations

* add changelog

* handle error from compact

* return error

* improve test

* not enforce that memo strings of allowed packet data must be JSON-encoded strings

* use slices contains to check if memo is allowed

* Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go

Co-authored-by: srdtrk <59252793+srdtrk@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go

Co-authored-by: srdtrk <59252793+srdtrk@users.noreply.github.com>

* lint

---------

Co-authored-by: srdtrk <59252793+srdtrk@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0a22b7a)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	docs/docs/02-apps/01-transfer/08-authorizations.md
#	modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go
@mergify mergify bot added the conflicts label May 10, 2024
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from colin-axner as a code owner May 10, 2024 12:33
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented May 10, 2024

Cherry-pick of 0a22b7a has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/release/v8.3.x/pr-6268
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/release/v8.3.x'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 0a22b7a2.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   modules/apps/transfer/types/authz.pb.go
	modified:   modules/apps/transfer/types/keys.go
	modified:   modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization_test.go
	modified:   proto/ibc/applications/transfer/v1/authz.proto

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	both modified:   CHANGELOG.md
	deleted by us:   docs/docs/02-apps/01-transfer/08-authorizations.md
	both modified:   modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 10, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega merged commit 5470cd2 into release/v8.3.x May 13, 2024
19 checks passed
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the mergify/bp/release/v8.3.x/pr-6268 branch May 13, 2024 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants