Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix portkeeper Route arg naming #6316

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

damiannolan
Copy link
Member

@damiannolan damiannolan commented May 15, 2024

Description

Missed in #6138


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Modified routing logic to use a module string parameter instead of clientID for improved clarity and flexibility.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The Route function in the Keeper struct within the keeper.go file was updated to accept a module string parameter instead of a clientID. This change impacts the routing logic, altering how modules are identified and processed within the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) framework.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
modules/core/05-port/keeper/keeper.go Modified Route function to accept module string parameter instead of clientID, affecting routing logic.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@damiannolan damiannolan marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2024 12:34
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0923e49 and 883b6a0.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/core/05-port/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
modules/core/05-port/keeper/keeper.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Additional comments not posted (7)
modules/core/05-port/keeper/keeper.go (7)

Line range hint 23-26: The IsBound method is correctly implemented and follows best practices.


Line range hint 29-42: The BindPort method is correctly implemented with proper error handling and logging.


Line range hint 45-52: The Authenticate method is correctly implemented with proper error handling.


Line range hint 55-63: The LookupModuleByPort method is correctly implemented with proper error handling and returns the expected values.


Line range hint 17-19: The Logger method is correctly implemented and follows best practices.


Line range hint 12-15: The NewKeeper method is correctly implemented and follows best practices.


Line range hint 8-10: The Keeper struct is correctly defined and follows best practices.

modules/core/05-port/keeper/keeper.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@damiannolan damiannolan merged commit 6ba52c5 into main May 16, 2024
19 of 23 checks passed
@damiannolan damiannolan deleted the damian/fix-local-var-naming-portkeeper-route branch May 16, 2024 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants