-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 586
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(transfer): last chain in forwarding packet is ICS20 v1 #6622
Changes from all commits
7a2b235
4e23aff
6d9c9ea
4326e6f
d460d8c
7ff0760
1f19d33
d118811
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -5,12 +5,16 @@ package transfer | |
import ( | ||
"context" | ||
"testing" | ||
"time" | ||
|
||
"github.com/strangelove-ventures/interchaintest/v8/ibc" | ||
testifysuite "github.com/stretchr/testify/suite" | ||
|
||
"github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/e2e/testsuite" | ||
"github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/e2e/testsuite/query" | ||
"github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/e2e/testvalues" | ||
transfertypes "github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v8/modules/apps/transfer/types" | ||
clienttypes "github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v8/modules/core/02-client/types" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func TestTransferForwardingTestSuite(t *testing.T) { | ||
|
@@ -95,3 +99,69 @@ func (s *TransferForwardingTestSuite) TestThreeChainSetup() { | |
s.Require().Equal(expected, actualBalance.Int64()) | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (s *TransferForwardingTestSuite) TestForwarding_WithLastChainBeingICS20v1_Succeeds() { | ||
ctx := context.TODO() | ||
t := s.T() | ||
|
||
relayer, chains := s.GetRelayer(), s.GetAllChains() | ||
|
||
chainA, chainB, chainC := chains[0], chains[1], chains[2] | ||
|
||
channelAtoB := s.GetChainAChannel() | ||
|
||
// Creating a new path between chain B and chain C with a ICS20-v1 channel | ||
opts := s.TransferChannelOptions() | ||
opts.Version = transfertypes.V1 | ||
channelBtoC, _ := s.CreateNewPath(ctx, chainB, chainC, ibc.DefaultClientOpts(), opts) | ||
s.Require().Equal(transfertypes.V1, channelBtoC.Version, "the channel version is not ics20-1") | ||
|
||
chainAWallet := s.CreateUserOnChainA(ctx, testvalues.StartingTokenAmount) | ||
chainAAddress := chainAWallet.FormattedAddress() | ||
chainADenom := chainA.Config().Denom | ||
|
||
chainCWallet := s.CreateUserOnChainC(ctx, testvalues.StartingTokenAmount) | ||
chainCAddress := chainCWallet.FormattedAddress() | ||
|
||
t.Run("IBC transfer from A to C with forwarding through B", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
inFiveMinutes := time.Now().Add(5 * time.Minute).UnixNano() | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. [q] can we use here https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/feat%2Fics20-v2-path-forwarding/testing/chain.go#L634 instead? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Unfortunately no. I have not found a nice way to do this. The best option I had was a function that queries the latest header and gets the current block time from that. But since these are anyway running in real time in the background, I think just using current time will always work. Two options I see to improve this:
|
||
forwarding := transfertypes.NewForwarding(false, transfertypes.Hop{ | ||
PortId: channelBtoC.PortID, | ||
ChannelId: channelBtoC.ChannelID, | ||
}) | ||
|
||
msgTransfer := testsuite.GetMsgTransfer( | ||
channelAtoB.PortID, | ||
channelAtoB.ChannelID, | ||
transfertypes.V2, | ||
testvalues.DefaultTransferCoins(chainADenom), | ||
chainAAddress, | ||
chainCAddress, | ||
clienttypes.ZeroHeight(), | ||
uint64(inFiveMinutes), | ||
"", | ||
forwarding) | ||
resp := s.BroadcastMessages(ctx, chainA, chainAWallet, msgTransfer) | ||
s.AssertTxSuccess(resp) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
t.Run("start relayer", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
s.StartRelayer(relayer) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
t.Run("packets are relayed from A to B to C", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
chainCDenom := transfertypes.NewDenom(chainADenom, | ||
transfertypes.NewTrace(channelBtoC.Counterparty.PortID, channelBtoC.Counterparty.ChannelID), | ||
transfertypes.NewTrace(channelAtoB.Counterparty.PortID, channelAtoB.Counterparty.ChannelID), | ||
) | ||
|
||
s.AssertPacketRelayed(ctx, chainA, channelAtoB.PortID, channelAtoB.ChannelID, 1) | ||
s.AssertPacketRelayed(ctx, chainB, channelBtoC.PortID, channelBtoC.ChannelID, 1) | ||
|
||
actualBalance, err := query.Balance(ctx, chainC, chainCAddress, chainCDenom.IBCDenom()) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
|
||
expected := testvalues.IBCTransferAmount | ||
s.Require().Equal(expected, actualBalance.Int64()) | ||
}) | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -177,52 +177,66 @@ func (s *E2ETestSuite) SetupTest() { | |
s.SetupPath(ibc.DefaultClientOpts(), defaultChannelOpts(s.GetAllChains())) | ||
} | ||
|
||
// SetupPath creates a path between the chains using the provided client and channel options. | ||
// SetupPath creates paths between the all chains using the provided client and channel options. | ||
func (s *E2ETestSuite) SetupPath(clientOpts ibc.CreateClientOptions, channelOpts ibc.CreateChannelOptions) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I was tempted to rename this to There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If it creates more than one path, I am absolutely in agreement on renaming :) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, it used to create only one path always, and still does whenever there are only two chains. But it now creates paths such that all chains are connected in a line A->B->C->etc. |
||
s.T().Logf("Setting up path for: %s", s.T().Name()) | ||
r := s.relayer | ||
|
||
ctx := context.TODO() | ||
allChains := s.GetAllChains() | ||
for i := 0; i < len(allChains)-1; i++ { | ||
chainA, chainB := allChains[i], allChains[i+1] | ||
pathName := s.generatePathName() | ||
s.T().Logf("establishing path between %s and %s on path %s", chainA.Config().ChainID, chainB.Config().ChainID, pathName) | ||
_, _ = s.CreateNewPath(ctx, chainA, chainB, clientOpts, channelOpts) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (s *E2ETestSuite) CreateNewPath( | ||
ctx context.Context, | ||
chainA ibc.Chain, | ||
chainB ibc.Chain, | ||
clientOpts ibc.CreateClientOptions, | ||
channelOpts ibc.CreateChannelOptions, | ||
) (chainAChannel ibc.ChannelOutput, chainBChannel ibc.ChannelOutput) { | ||
r := s.relayer | ||
|
||
err := r.GeneratePath(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), chainA.Config().ChainID, chainB.Config().ChainID, pathName) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
pathName := s.generatePathName() | ||
s.T().Logf("establishing path between %s and %s on path %s", chainA.Config().ChainID, chainB.Config().ChainID, pathName) | ||
|
||
// Create new clients | ||
err = r.CreateClients(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), pathName, clientOpts) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err = test.WaitForBlocks(ctx, 1, chainA, chainB) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err := r.GeneratePath(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), chainA.Config().ChainID, chainB.Config().ChainID, pathName) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
|
||
err = r.CreateConnections(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), pathName) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err = test.WaitForBlocks(ctx, 1, chainA, chainB) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
// Create new clients | ||
err = r.CreateClients(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), pathName, clientOpts) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err = test.WaitForBlocks(ctx, 1, chainA, chainB) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
|
||
err = r.CreateChannel(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), pathName, channelOpts) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err = test.WaitForBlocks(ctx, 1, chainA, chainB) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err = r.CreateConnections(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), pathName) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err = test.WaitForBlocks(ctx, 1, chainA, chainB) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
|
||
channelsA, err := r.GetChannels(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), chainA.Config().ChainID) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err = r.CreateChannel(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), pathName, channelOpts) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
err = test.WaitForBlocks(ctx, 1, chainA, chainB) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
|
||
channelsB, err := r.GetChannels(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), chainB.Config().ChainID) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
channelsA, err := r.GetChannels(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), chainA.Config().ChainID) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
|
||
if s.channels[s.T().Name()] == nil { | ||
s.channels[s.T().Name()] = make(map[ibc.Chain][]ibc.ChannelOutput) | ||
} | ||
channelsB, err := r.GetChannels(ctx, s.GetRelayerExecReporter(), chainB.Config().ChainID) | ||
s.Require().NoError(err) | ||
|
||
// keep track of channels associated with a given chain for access within the tests. | ||
s.channels[s.T().Name()][chainA] = channelsA | ||
s.channels[s.T().Name()][chainB] = channelsB | ||
s.testPaths[s.T().Name()] = append(s.testPaths[s.T().Name()], pathName) | ||
if s.channels[s.T().Name()] == nil { | ||
s.channels[s.T().Name()] = make(map[ibc.Chain][]ibc.ChannelOutput) | ||
} | ||
|
||
// keep track of channels associated with a given chain for access within the tests. | ||
s.channels[s.T().Name()][chainA] = channelsA | ||
s.channels[s.T().Name()][chainB] = channelsB | ||
|
||
s.testPaths[s.T().Name()] = append(s.testPaths[s.T().Name()], pathName) | ||
|
||
return channelsA[len(channelsA)-1], channelsB[len(channelsB)-1] | ||
} | ||
|
||
// GetChainAChannel returns the ibc.ChannelOutput for the current test. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went a bit back and forth on how to do this and in the end I thought the cleanest way was to just create a new path for this test because the alternative would be to move this to a separate TestSuite which I didn't like very much.