Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: make transfer module v2 use same core paths as v1 #7754

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: feat/ibc-eureka
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gjermundgaraba
Copy link
Contributor

Description

closes: #7687


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2024 19:13
Copy link

Copy link
Member

@AdityaSripal AdityaSripal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work! Just a couple nits so far

Comment on lines +55 to +56
sourcePort string,
sourceChannel string,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: but i like having this first in the arg list after ctx

case *channeltypes.Acknowledgement_Result:
// Write a successful async ack for the forwardedPacket
forwardAck := channeltypes.NewResultAcknowledgement([]byte{byte(1)})
return k.acknowledgeForwardedPacket(ctx, forwardedPacket, packet, forwardAck)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't we pull this out of the switch case? since its the same call in both cases

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants