Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Flexible identifier selection #482
Flexible identifier selection #482
Changes from 5 commits
9ef11e5
2e0c350
262a7de
5d845a0
67d9088
b805be3
4630d60
ff93ac3
3354f39
dad036a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couldn't this just be a boolean indicating if the sending chain decided to choose the identifier or not?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure, though we'll still construct a "provedIdentifier" since we need to check it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bit confusing to me.
proved identifier is empty or comes from the init chain.
Desired Identifier comes from the receiving chain. But where? There doesn't seem to be a way to say "use whatever name they suggest", or "use whatever name they suggest if it starts with 'foo'" for example.
Rather than comparing here, it would make more sense to have
function desiredIdentifier(provedIdentifier) -> Identifier {}
So the receiving module can make this decision and about if desired
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, that's the intended usage, it just doesn't need to happen "within" the IBC module, per se. I can add a note about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added a comment with your example.