CXXCBC-646: Do not copy configuration when the operation depends on it #713
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
avsej
force-pushed
the
rel-1.0-CXXCBC-646-fix-performance-issue-with-replicas
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ae4889d to
83db886
Compare
For performance reasons, store bucket configuration as shared pointer, and copy it instead. The SDK can use shared pointer here, as configuration is readonly, and only access to the pointer have to be protected by the mutex
avsej
force-pushed
the
rel-1.0-CXXCBC-646-fix-performance-issue-with-replicas
branch
from
83db886 to
fade09f
Compare
avsej
deleted the
rel-1.0-CXXCBC-646-fix-performance-issue-with-replicas
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For performance reasons, store bucket configuration as shared pointer, and copy it instead. The SDK can use shared pointer here, as configuration is readonly, and only access to the pointer have to be protected by the mutex