Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new test to prove that library evaluation with parameters and returned sets works. #623

Merged

Conversation

lukedegruchy
Copy link
Contributor

  • Test only change
  • Add new test to prove that library evaluation with parameters and returned sets works.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Formatting check succeeded!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.13%. Comparing base (7916b7b) to head (fae7f18).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #623      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     74.09%   74.13%   +0.03%     
  Complexity       19       19              
============================================
  Files           363      363              
  Lines         19054    19054              
  Branches       2531     2531              
============================================
+ Hits          14119    14126       +7     
+ Misses         3595     3590       -5     
+ Partials       1340     1338       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lukedegruchy lukedegruchy enabled auto-merge (squash) January 9, 2025 14:36
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 9, 2025

@lukedegruchy lukedegruchy merged commit 0a9eeab into master Jan 9, 2025
8 checks passed
@lukedegruchy lukedegruchy deleted the ld-20250107-library-evaluation-returned-sets-test branch January 9, 2025 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants