Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Rollup merge of rust-lang#52782 - pnkfelix:issue-45696-dangly-paths-f…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…or-box, r=eddyb

[NLL] Dangly paths for box

Special-case `Box` in `rustc_mir::borrow_check`.

Since we know dropping a box will not access any `&mut` or `&` references, it is safe to model its destructor as only touching the contents *owned* by the box.

----

There are three main things going on here:

1. The first main thing, this PR is fixing a bug in NLL where `rustc` previously would issue a diagnostic error in a case like this:
```rust
fn foo(x: Box<&mut i32>) -> &mut i32 { &mut **x }
```

such code was accepted by the AST-borrowck in the past, but NLL was rejecting it with the following message ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=13c5560f73bfb16d6dab3ceaad44c0f8&version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2015))
```
error[E0597]: `**x` does not live long enough
 --> src/main.rs:3:40
  |
3 | fn foo(x: Box<&mut i32>) -> &mut i32 { &mut **x }
  |                                        ^^^^^^^^ - `**x` dropped here while still borrowed
  |                                        |
  |                                        borrowed value does not live long enough
  |
note: borrowed value must be valid for the anonymous lifetime rust-lang#1 defined on the function body at 3:1...
 --> src/main.rs:3:1
  |
3 | fn foo(x: Box<&mut i32>) -> &mut i32 { &mut **x }
  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to previous error
```

2. The second main thing: The reason such code was previously rejected was because NLL (MIR-borrowck) incorporates a fix for issue rust-lang#31567, where it models a destructor's execution as potentially accessing any borrows held by the thing being destructed. The tests with `Scribble` model this, showing that the compiler now catches such unsoundness.

However, that fix for issue rust-lang#31567 is too strong, in that NLL (MIR-borrowck) includes `Box` as one of the types with a destructor that potentially accesses any borrows held by the box. This thus was the cause of the main remaining discrepancy between AST-borrowck and MIR-borrowck, as documented in issue rust-lang#45696, specifically in [the last example of this comment](rust-lang#45696 (comment)), which I have adapted into the `fn foo` shown above.

We did close issue rust-lang#45696 back in December of 2017, but AFAICT that example was not fixed by PR rust-lang#46268. (And we did not include a test, etc etc.)

This PR fixes that case, by trying to model the so-called `DerefPure` semantics of `Box<T>` when we traverse the type of the input to `visit_terminator_drop`.

3. The third main thing is that during a review of the first draft of this PR, @matthewjasper pointed out that the new traversal of `Box<T>` could cause the compiler to infinite loop. I have adjusted the PR to avoid this (by tracking what types we have previously seen), and added a much needed test of this somewhat odd scenario. (Its an odd scenario because the particular case only arises for things like `struct A(Box<A>);`, something which cannot be constructed in practice.)

Fix rust-lang#45696.
  • Loading branch information
cramertj authored Aug 2, 2018
2 parents bd67fce + c02c00b commit ca93f6f
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 9 changed files with 586 additions and 9 deletions.
151 changes: 146 additions & 5 deletions src/librustc_mir/borrow_check/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ use rustc::mir::{ClearCrossCrate, Local, Location, Mir, Mutability, Operand, Pla
use rustc::mir::{Field, Projection, ProjectionElem, Rvalue, Statement, StatementKind};
use rustc::mir::{Terminator, TerminatorKind};
use rustc::ty::query::Providers;
use rustc::ty::{self, ParamEnv, TyCtxt};
use rustc::ty::{self, ParamEnv, TyCtxt, Ty};

use rustc_errors::{Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, Level};
use rustc_data_structures::graph::dominators::Dominators;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -598,7 +598,12 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> DataflowResultsConsumer<'cx, 'tcx> for MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx
// that is useful later.
let drop_place_ty = gcx.lift(&drop_place_ty).unwrap();

self.visit_terminator_drop(loc, term, flow_state, drop_place, drop_place_ty, span);
debug!("visit_terminator_drop \
loc: {:?} term: {:?} drop_place: {:?} drop_place_ty: {:?} span: {:?}",
loc, term, drop_place, drop_place_ty, span);

self.visit_terminator_drop(
loc, term, flow_state, drop_place, drop_place_ty, span, SeenTy(None));
}
TerminatorKind::DropAndReplace {
location: ref drop_place,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -832,6 +837,35 @@ impl InitializationRequiringAction {
}
}

/// A simple linked-list threaded up the stack of recursive calls in `visit_terminator_drop`.
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
struct SeenTy<'a, 'gcx: 'a>(Option<(Ty<'gcx>, &'a SeenTy<'a, 'gcx>)>);

impl<'a, 'gcx> SeenTy<'a, 'gcx> {
/// Return a new list with `ty` prepended to the front of `self`.
fn cons(&'a self, ty: Ty<'gcx>) -> Self {
SeenTy(Some((ty, self)))
}

/// True if and only if `ty` occurs on the linked list `self`.
fn have_seen(self, ty: Ty) -> bool {
let mut this = self.0;
loop {
match this {
None => return false,
Some((seen_ty, recur)) => {
if seen_ty == ty {
return true;
} else {
this = recur.0;
continue;
}
}
}
}
}
}

impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
/// Invokes `access_place` as appropriate for dropping the value
/// at `drop_place`. Note that the *actual* `Drop` in the MIR is
Expand All @@ -847,14 +881,57 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
drop_place: &Place<'tcx>,
erased_drop_place_ty: ty::Ty<'gcx>,
span: Span,
prev_seen: SeenTy<'_, 'gcx>,
) {
if prev_seen.have_seen(erased_drop_place_ty) {
// if we have directly seen the input ty `T`, then we must
// have had some *direct* ownership loop between `T` and
// some directly-owned (as in, actually traversed by
// recursive calls below) part that is also of type `T`.
//
// Note: in *all* such cases, the data in question cannot
// be constructed (nor destructed) in finite time/space.
//
// Proper examples, some of which are statically rejected:
//
// * `struct A { field: A, ... }`:
// statically rejected as infinite size
//
// * `type B = (B, ...);`:
// statically rejected as cyclic
//
// * `struct C { field: Box<C>, ... }`
// * `struct D { field: Box<(D, D)>, ... }`:
// *accepted*, though impossible to construct
//
// Here is *NOT* an example:
// * `struct Z { field: Option<Box<Z>>, ... }`:
// Here, the type is both representable in finite space (due to the boxed indirection)
// and constructable in finite time (since the recursion can bottom out with `None`).
// This is an obvious instance of something the compiler must accept.
//
// Since some of the above impossible cases like `C` and
// `D` are accepted by the compiler, we must take care not
// to infinite-loop while processing them. But since such
// cases cannot actually arise, it is sound for us to just
// skip them during drop. If the developer uses unsafe
// code to construct them, they should not be surprised by
// weird drop behavior in their resulting code.
debug!("visit_terminator_drop previously seen \
erased_drop_place_ty: {:?} on prev_seen: {:?}; returning early.",
erased_drop_place_ty, prev_seen);
return;
}

let gcx = self.tcx.global_tcx();
let drop_field = |mir: &mut MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
(index, field): (usize, ty::Ty<'gcx>)| {
let field_ty = gcx.normalize_erasing_regions(mir.param_env, field);
let place = drop_place.clone().field(Field::new(index), field_ty);

mir.visit_terminator_drop(loc, term, flow_state, &place, field_ty, span);
debug!("visit_terminator_drop drop_field place: {:?} field_ty: {:?}", place, field_ty);
let seen = prev_seen.cons(erased_drop_place_ty);
mir.visit_terminator_drop(loc, term, flow_state, &place, field_ty, span, seen);
};

match erased_drop_place_ty.sty {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -899,20 +976,84 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
.enumerate()
.for_each(|field| drop_field(self, field));
}

// #45696: special-case Box<T> by treating its dtor as
// only deep *across owned content*. Namely, we know
// dropping a box does not touch data behind any
// references it holds; if we were to instead fall into
// the base case below, we would have a Deep Write due to
// the box being `needs_drop`, and that Deep Write would
// touch `&mut` data in the box.
ty::TyAdt(def, _) if def.is_box() => {
// When/if we add a `&own T` type, this action would
// be like running the destructor of the `&own T`.
// (And the owner of backing storage referenced by the
// `&own T` would be responsible for deallocating that
// backing storage.)

// we model dropping any content owned by the box by
// recurring on box contents. This catches cases like
// `Box<Box<ScribbleWhenDropped<&mut T>>>`, while
// still restricting Write to *owned* content.
let ty = erased_drop_place_ty.boxed_ty();
let deref_place = drop_place.clone().deref();
debug!("visit_terminator_drop drop-box-content deref_place: {:?} ty: {:?}",
deref_place, ty);
let seen = prev_seen.cons(erased_drop_place_ty);
self.visit_terminator_drop(
loc, term, flow_state, &deref_place, ty, span, seen);
}

_ => {
// We have now refined the type of the value being
// dropped (potentially) to just the type of a
// subfield; so check whether that field's type still
// "needs drop". If so, we assume that the destructor
// may access any data it likes (i.e., a Deep Write).
// "needs drop".
if erased_drop_place_ty.needs_drop(gcx, self.param_env) {
// If so, we assume that the destructor may access
// any data it likes (i.e., a Deep Write).
self.access_place(
ContextKind::Drop.new(loc),
(drop_place, span),
(Deep, Write(WriteKind::StorageDeadOrDrop)),
LocalMutationIsAllowed::Yes,
flow_state,
);
} else {
// If there is no destructor, we still include a
// *shallow* write. This essentially ensures that
// borrows of the memory directly at `drop_place`
// cannot continue to be borrowed across the drop.
//
// If we were to use a Deep Write here, then any
// `&mut T` that is reachable from `drop_place`
// would get invalidated; fixing that is the
// essence of resolving issue #45696.
//
// * Note: In the compiler today, doing a Deep
// Write here would not actually break
// anything beyond #45696; for example it does not
// break this example:
//
// ```rust
// fn reborrow(x: &mut i32) -> &mut i32 { &mut *x }
// ```
//
// Why? Because we do not schedule/emit
// `Drop(x)` in the MIR unless `x` needs drop in
// the first place.
//
// FIXME: Its possible this logic actually should
// be attached to the `StorageDead` statement
// rather than the `Drop`. See discussion on PR
// #52782.
self.access_place(
ContextKind::Drop.new(loc),
(drop_place, span),
(Shallow(None), Write(WriteKind::StorageDeadOrDrop)),
LocalMutationIsAllowed::Yes,
flow_state,
);
}
}
}
Expand Down
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions src/test/ui/generator/dropck.nll.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,8 +9,6 @@ LL | }
| |
| `*cell` dropped here while still borrowed
| borrow later used here, when `gen` is dropped
|
= note: values in a scope are dropped in the opposite order they are defined

error[E0597]: `ref_` does not live long enough
--> $DIR/dropck.rs:22:11
Expand Down
133 changes: 133 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/issue-45696-long-live-borrows-in-boxes.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
// Copyright 2018 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.

// rust-lang/rust#45696: This test is checking that we can return
// mutable borrows owned by boxes even when the boxes are dropped.
//
// We will explicitly test AST-borrowck, NLL, and migration modes;
// thus we will also skip the automated compare-mode=nll.

// revisions: ast nll migrate
// ignore-compare-mode-nll

#![cfg_attr(nll, feature(nll))]
//[migrate]compile-flags: -Z borrowck=migrate -Z two-phase-borrows

// run-pass

// This function shows quite directly what is going on: We have a
// reborrow of contents within the box.
fn return_borrow_from_dropped_box_1(x: Box<&mut u32>) -> &mut u32 { &mut **x }

// This function is the way you'll probably see this in practice (the
// reborrow is now implicit).
fn return_borrow_from_dropped_box_2(x: Box<&mut u32>) -> &mut u32 { *x }

// For the remaining tests we just add some fields or other
// indirection to ensure that the compiler isn't just special-casing
// the above `Box<&mut T>` as the only type that would work.

// Here we add a tuple of indirection between the box and the
// reference.
type BoxedTup<'a, 'b> = Box<(&'a mut u32, &'b mut u32)>;

fn return_borrow_of_field_from_dropped_box_1<'a>(x: BoxedTup<'a, '_>) -> &'a mut u32 {
&mut *x.0
}

fn return_borrow_of_field_from_dropped_box_2<'a>(x: BoxedTup<'a, '_>) -> &'a mut u32 {
x.0
}

fn return_borrow_from_dropped_tupled_box_1<'a>(x: (BoxedTup<'a, '_>, &mut u32)) -> &'a mut u32 {
&mut *(x.0).0
}

fn return_borrow_from_dropped_tupled_box_2<'a>(x: (BoxedTup<'a, '_>, &mut u32)) -> &'a mut u32 {
(x.0).0
}

fn basic_tests() {
let mut x = 2;
let mut y = 3;
let mut z = 4;
*return_borrow_from_dropped_box_1(Box::new(&mut x)) += 10;
assert_eq!((x, y, z), (12, 3, 4));
*return_borrow_from_dropped_box_2(Box::new(&mut x)) += 10;
assert_eq!((x, y, z), (22, 3, 4));
*return_borrow_of_field_from_dropped_box_1(Box::new((&mut x, &mut y))) += 10;
assert_eq!((x, y, z), (32, 3, 4));
*return_borrow_of_field_from_dropped_box_2(Box::new((&mut x, &mut y))) += 10;
assert_eq!((x, y, z), (42, 3, 4));
*return_borrow_from_dropped_tupled_box_1((Box::new((&mut x, &mut y)), &mut z)) += 10;
assert_eq!((x, y, z), (52, 3, 4));
*return_borrow_from_dropped_tupled_box_2((Box::new((&mut x, &mut y)), &mut z)) += 10;
assert_eq!((x, y, z), (62, 3, 4));
}

// These scribbling tests have been transcribed from
// issue-45696-scribble-on-boxed-borrow.rs
//
// In the context of that file, these tests are meant to show cases
// that should be *accepted* by the compiler, so here we are actually
// checking that the code we get when they are compiled matches our
// expectations.

struct Scribble<'a>(&'a mut u32);

impl<'a> Drop for Scribble<'a> { fn drop(&mut self) { *self.0 = 42; } }

// this is okay, in both AST-borrowck and NLL: The `Scribble` here *has*
// to strictly outlive `'a`
fn borrowed_scribble<'a>(s: &'a mut Scribble) -> &'a mut u32 {
&mut *s.0
}

// this, by analogy to previous case, is also okay.
fn boxed_borrowed_scribble<'a>(s: Box<&'a mut Scribble>) -> &'a mut u32 {
&mut *(*s).0
}

// this, by analogy to previous case, is also okay.
fn boxed_boxed_borrowed_scribble<'a>(s: Box<Box<&'a mut Scribble>>) -> &'a mut u32 {
&mut *(**s).0
}

fn scribbling_tests() {
let mut x = 1;
{
let mut long_lived = Scribble(&mut x);
*borrowed_scribble(&mut long_lived) += 10;
assert_eq!(*long_lived.0, 11);
// (Scribble dtor runs here, after `&mut`-borrow above ends)
}
assert_eq!(x, 42);
x = 1;
{
let mut long_lived = Scribble(&mut x);
*boxed_borrowed_scribble(Box::new(&mut long_lived)) += 10;
assert_eq!(*long_lived.0, 11);
// (Scribble dtor runs here, after `&mut`-borrow above ends)
}
assert_eq!(x, 42);
x = 1;
{
let mut long_lived = Scribble(&mut x);
*boxed_boxed_borrowed_scribble(Box::new(Box::new(&mut long_lived))) += 10;
assert_eq!(*long_lived.0, 11);
// (Scribble dtor runs here, after `&mut`-borrow above ends)
}
assert_eq!(x, 42);
}

fn main() {
basic_tests();
scribbling_tests();
}
Loading

0 comments on commit ca93f6f

Please sign in to comment.