-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem: don't support hardfork style upgrades #1258
Conversation
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@yihuang has exceeded the limit for the number of files or commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe software has been updated to include support for hard-fork style upgrades. A new variable for storing fork information and a function for initiating fork logic during the block beginning phase have been added. These allow the application to seamlessly transition through upgrades at specified blockchain heights. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- app/app.go (2 hunks)
- app/forks.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
CHANGELOG.md (1)
- 3-5: The CHANGELOG.md correctly documents the addition of support for hard-fork style upgrades as an unreleased feature, which aligns with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summaries.
app/app.go (3)
175-178: The addition of the
Forks
variable is consistent with the PR's objective to handle hardfork-style upgrades. Ensure that theFork
struct and its usage are properly documented for maintainability.987-989: The call to
BeginBlockForks
within theBeginBlocker
function is a critical part of the upgrade mechanism. It's important to ensure thatBeginBlockForks
is robust, handles errors gracefully, and does not negatively impact the performance of block processing.#!/bin/bash # Verify that BeginBlockForks function exists and is properly defined in forks.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func BeginBlockForks($_, $_) $_ { $$$ }'
- 175-182: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [175-991]
Overall, the changes to
app.go
align with the PR's objectives to handle hardfork-style upgrades. It is crucial to ensure that the newFork
struct and theBeginBlockForks
function are thoroughly tested, especially since they are part of the blockchain's consensus-critical code.app/forks.go (3)
5-20: The
Fork
struct is well-documented and contains clear fields for upgrade management. The reference to the Osmosis project provides context for the adaptation, which is good for maintainability.22-30: The
BeginBlockForks
function assumes that there will only be one fork per block height. If the system is intended to support multiple forks at the same height, this could be a limitation. Please confirm if this is by design.22-30: The
Forks
variable is used withinBeginBlockForks
but its definition and initialization are not shown. Ensure thatForks
is properly defined and initialized elsewhere in the codebase.#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and initialization of the `Forks` variable. rg 'var Forks \[\]Fork'
Signed-off-by: yihuang <huang@crypto.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1258 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 35.83% 35.81% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 115 116 +1
Lines 10647 10653 +6
==========================================
Hits 3815 3815
- Misses 6456 6462 +6
Partials 376 376
|
7ee87f0
👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make
)make test
)go fmt
)golangci-lint run
)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth
)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes