A more natural way to use not
.
Might be easier to read in a voice that doesn't sound like Borat
Boolean conditions sometimes require mental gymnastics from the reader especially on more complicated expressions which may lead to subtle bugs.
Some languages have a not
keyword available to reduce this kind of bugs especially with the sometimes hard to see single !
negatiting whole expressions.
Unfortunately this is not the case in rust.
Instead the std::ops::Not
can only be applied to the end of an expression making it hard to read again.
This is the std
way of using not
:
use std::ops::Not;
if foo.some_condition().not() {
// etc.
}
With this crate you can achieve the more natural way of reading code like if not some condition
is true.
use nicht::not;
if not(foo.some_condition()) {
// etc.
}