Added LICENSE file #149
Merged
Added LICENSE file #149
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@geelen, @sokra, @timdorr, @TrySound, @sullenor, @douglasduteil, any chance of getting this merged to master and the npm package published? |
|
I published version 1.2.1, but it is still under the |
|
@sullenor, thanks a lot! |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
My company is strict about licencing (even for dev deps) and require an explicit licence file for vendored projects rather than simply naming the licence. I believe this is due to the possibility that the licence will change over time and without the file it's not clear what terms were agreed to. Anyway it would be much appreciated if you added the LSC licence file.
Thanks.